WCOOP 1K Turbo Final Table History Review with DannyN13 (Part 2)
[Total: 5 Average: 10/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5
Concepts In This Video: 3-Betting • C-Betting • hand History • High Stakes • HUD • Icmizer • Mid Stages • Pokerstars • Popular MTTs: Turbos • Post-flop • pre-flop • WCOOP
legend44
Danny , at the 18:07 mark you shoved Q9 in SB but according to the Jennifer chart with 7BB i did not see Q9 in the chart you mentioned something about 10x shove. Can you clarify that ? Thanks
DannyN13
95o+ is in the chart if you look. This means any 9 with 5 or better . 10x suited is a shove.
DannyN13
Also note, in the top left of each square in the chart it says X% of range of hands that is a shove. You’ll see 83.7% of hands in this spot. If you think about how wide 84% of hands are, you’ll quickly realize if your hand is a shove if you hold something like Q9o since that’s obviously not in the bottom of 16% of hands. Just for future reference.
legend491
what does 95 o have to do with Q9?
smallcat66
At 18.30 what should Tlaing do with his 10 10 if he thinks Vinkyy is inducing UTG ?
mykhalzyruskane
Another great continuation vid! Danny, thanks for sharing! Where can I get a copy of the Jennifear chart for review and study?
airedale05
On the 55 hand….does icmizer take into account it’s a turbo. You had said earlier that u need to gamble a little bit more cause of the structure. Is the structure taken into acct in the icmizer numbers or does structure matter at that point?
hoosierdawg
I might be incorrect, but I think that when you ran ICMizer on the 55, it is treating it like the final table. That would change the math quite a bit. If you run it as a chip EV spot 55 is plus 3 bb. Given you are way out of the money I think that is more appropriate.
DannyN13
Wow thank you so much for picking up on that. Looks like you are correct and that I didn’t change to chip EV. I really appreciate it and my apologies guys I didn’t notice that when I was recording.