TPE Theory: Shortstack Play (Part 4)
[Total: 7 Average: 7.1/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 5 | Part 6
TPE Theory: Shortstack Play (Part 4)
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 5 | Part 6
andinista
Great series so far.
1, If I am evaluating a Nash spot according to a 16bb/100 winrate, should I just set the HRC or ICMizer software at min EV diff of .16 and take all spots that are above this threshold in early game spots? Sometimes this just feels like so much risk when stacks are deep and we’re only expecting a few hundred chips in profit.
2. I’m new to the HRC, and most functions are going great. But I find when I load an advanced hand, that I have to manually input one starting range before it populates all the response ranges. Is this standard, or is there a way for it to give me the villains optimal range for an open to start the hand?
andinista
Damn cant edit comments? Disregard #2, figured out what I was doing wrong.
zampana
Yes great series – not sure if you’re still checking comments. If we’re raising 24% of our top hands and then pushing the medium hands, but no raise/folds, doesn’t this become exploitable? V’s will know that whenever we raise, we’re strong, whenever we push, we’re ok and when we fold we’re weak. Don’t we want some bluffs in that raising range, even with the wide range of the BB?