11 Responses to “TPE Theory: Bluffing with Andrew Brokos (Part 4)”

  1. ezbuttontime

    wow dat was a great series……i never comment but that was the first thing that came out of my mouth wen i finish watching this series

  2. Foucault

    Is that a compliment that you like the examples or a criticism that you want more examples? 😉

    Either way, my next series after this one is going to contain a lot more…

  3. mike666

    On 48 min with J10s hand – would you still shove the river if the card would be lower that a Q and also non-spade and non-diamond? Would your line be also the same if you would hit 10 or J on the river?

  4. Foucault

    That’s a good question. I think jamming most rivers is a good idea, but I wouldn’t shove a J or a T. I could actually see checking and calling those, as I doubt Villain will value bet many one pair hands on river, so his betting range would be polarized and probably bluff-heavy.

  5. folding_aces_pre_yo

    hey

    @5mins , how wide do you think your bluffing range should be here? you’re taking a hand that has some sorta showdown value and turning it into a bluff , this ain’t a number 5 spot.

    my counter argument to this would be is if u have a plan which is raise turn and bet big on the river on pretty much any non heart card or an ace then this could be considered a number 5 spot as the chances of villain folding on the river is really high.

    v bet sizing did seem weak on the turn too.

    also let’s say we were going to balance this with our value hands not only our bluffs , which strong hands are you going to play the same way that you decide to c/c and raise turn and bet big on the river?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.