[Total: 23 Average: 7.2/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5
TPE Theory: 3-betting and 4-betting (Part 1)
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5
Zhengix_Khaan
Yess…. The Uber zealous analysis of the annoying lil pest to my left who always tries to control me with his light 3 betting and ways to thwart his attempts……
Thanks in advance Daryl….. for the GREAT info and the dry zingers youll sneak in there!
panicattck
By default PT3 is adding each of the filters as an “AND” condition. To get the not facing 3bet I think you make a “NOT” group and then select facing 3bet.
PsyK1ck
Awesome! Haven’t seen the video yet, but surely will as soon as I get home. Thanks a lot for putting something like this together Daryl, exactly what we need, IMO. Keep up the great work!
jokesmetal
TT also has broadway blockers innit?
Zhengix_Khaan
yea two.. Broadway is a straight of Ten to Ace
MovesLikeDarvin
0:27 in and rule #1 of our video will be: NO UB SKIN on the replayer! tilts me so hard for no reason
neoanikitos
awful. i wouldn’t pay you a buck to explain anything to anybody
neoanikitos
After seeing the second and third i take it back. You are good and the use of extremes is what i do everytime i want to explain poker. Sorry for being cruel but i still think the biggest part of part 1 is garbage
markconkle
(this comment is referring to parts 1 through 3, after which point I gave up)
This is a rough draft at best. I’m unlikely to watch any videos from this player again.
Daryl, please use a higher degree of professionalism in your videos. Remember, the members are paying for this. Listening to 15 minutes of you repeating yourself, complaining about the software you are using, etc. is a huge waste of time when I could be playing, watching other videos, doing hand analysis, etc. Particularly onerous was in video 3 when you stumbled over “the effect it has on the effect of equity” and the like. Work out how you’re going to say this before subjecting your paying listeners to it.
I really love the material, but I think if someone transcribed all 4 parts of this video they could do a new voiceover and/or simply edit it down to 1 or MAYBE 2 videos in length, that would be more interesting and enjoyable, plus have a much better content:time ratio.
You know the stuff. Make it a presentation worth of a paid site.
huge
agreed that part 1 feels like a rough draft {albeit with a couple good points}. Not sure I have the courage to face 2,3,4.
d4rk
i enjoy it, once a month.