High Roller Hand History Review with Daryl “aaaaaaaa” Jace (Part 1)
[Total: 13 Average: 9.2/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 2 | Part 3
Concepts In This Video: Early Stages • hand History • High Stakes • HUD • Merge Network • Mid Stages
andinista
The A4s hand at around 15 minute- this is a standard raise/get in for me. Thinking about it more, it seems close to a pot control/induce situation. But “never ever raising, we’re just way too deep for that”??
Aren’t you concerned about losing value vs. flush draws and bare Ax hands? Many turns (including the one that hit) kill action vs hands you crush. Also, I really like the chunkier than average turn sizing I often see you make, but as played this hand seems to me like a spot for smaller sizing to keep more of his range in. Would you go 3/4 pot with a flush or a weak A here too?
What hands are you raising vs. his flop cbet?
Not criticizing your play, just trying to wrap my head around a line that is quite different than my standard in my struggle to cut back my spew.
Also, the ATs hand around halfway- River lead is bad as you noted, but if we ck the river, doesn’t it beg for 3rd barrel from enough villain misses to justify a ck/call 3 line? Would you dislike raising this turn?
Kalculater
23:45 onwards
When you talk about starting to range people, then comparing future streets and then two decisions at once it becomes a little unclear at that point as to what two decisions you are talking about. Is this how our hand plays against villains range as the future streets change the board? Can you explain this a little clearer?
An article or forum topic going more in depth about this step of processes would be great
Kalculater
23:45 onwards.
When you talk about starting to range people, then how your hand plays against their range going on to thinking about future streets and the two deicisons at once it started to become really unclear at the “two decisions at once” part as to what decisions they are. Can you elaborate on these processes further?
Possibly even a forum topic or article would be awesome.
Kalculater
Sorry for the double reply, website fked up and said that it didnt post.
aaaaaaaaa
hey guys will reply by today. sry for the delay
aaaaaaaaa
Hey was having trouble signing into my account the past 3-4 days. All fixed now will reply soon.
aaaaaaaaa
I mean today
aaaaaaaaa
Well i’m not sure if my opponent would call a raise and 2 more barrels with worse often CBI is pretty good. Losing value vs flush draws and worse aces is a good point, I’m worried he might fold some Ax to a raise here and i’m not sure if he did if he’d ever call another bet. I would like to raise vs flush draws tho for sure. Idk what do u think we should raise here? Should it include any bluffs?
The AT hand we should def just c/c river you’re right. As for raising turn what do u think the merits of raising are? R u calling a jam?
aaaaaaaaa
Hey, sorry if I was unclear in explaining my thought process. But ya u have it right. I’m trying to predict how turn/rivers would play given the 2 different lines I take and then I choose the one that seems more advantageous.
redvulture61
The players you refer to as bad as Fish i don’t think its the correct way to categorize them. A more correct term is recreational players…
folding_aces_pre_yo
hey jace 🙂
nice series man.
@1.20min , are you 3-betting KJo for value or as a bluff? I’m going to assume you’re widening your 3-bet value range here against this opponent.
@ 15.45min, you say we are too deep to raise? we’re likely to have the best hand a lot of the time 4 shurrr, only hands that beat you is AT/AA/TT/44 , given that you have one of the Aces , AA is very unlikely anyhow. I think we can go for 3-streets , we can get value from AK/AQ and flush/straight draws, which makes me wanna play our hand fast….why is calling better then checking here?
folding_aces_pre_yo
edit: why is calling flop better then raising here.