I would like to talk about reviewing hand histories at the advanced or pro
level.  Are pros actually sitting down and reviewing “all” their
hand histories post tourney?  I have to admit, that I have never had the
patience or discipline to do it on everything.  I think it's great for
newbs to get into the habit of doing early on so you don't struggle with it
later in life like I do, but with current technology today, specifically the
ability to mark hands for later retrieval, I just haven't been able to get myself
to do it.  90% of the tourney is mechanical for me and when you have
things like bet sizing, position, opening hand requirements, ICM, etc… down, is
there still much added value in HH review later that I am missing out on? 
If at any point in a tourney I struggle with a hand or decision, I instantly
mark it for later retrieval and follow up on it the best I can.  So are
the pros/grinders really reviewing “all” their hands later or are
they doing the same thing I am which is marking hands for later retrieval? 
I guess I just don't want to fall into one of those, “do as I say, not as
I do thing….”

In the video he was talking about set mining OOP and how he doesn't really
want to play a set OOP.  This is the first time I have ever heard anyone
talk about set mining OOP.  Could you elaborate on this a bit more? 
As long as I am getting the right implied odds to set, I just go ahead and do
it anyway.  What is causing you to take position into account when set
mining?  Is it that you don't want to be OOP on a draw heavy board?

Hagbard also talked about fold equity on a flop “if” he was to get
reraised.  I just wanted to point out that it was an absolute awesome
point and something to think about in decision making.  Any time I have
heard anyone talk about fold equity it has always been in preflop discussions,
and never once have I heard it in post flop play.  Thank you for pointing
this out because I will surely take it into account for future decision making!

The hand that you broke down on Timmy with the math you talked about how you
are not sure if he is a reg that will shove/fold in this spot every time. 
A 19/17 VPIP will and can go absolutely either way.  Based off his
aggression, it's safe to assume that 85% of the he is actually just going to
get it in.  Not sure what the number is in lower left of your HUD, but if
that is his aggression factor at 7+…then he is off the wall aggressive and
would further have me believe he is shoving any ace on you, and flatting with
suited connector type hands in that spot. A 19 vpip is playing low end aces,
suited connectors, and gap connectors more often than say a 12 vpip, so he
absolutely will peel a flop with you if you give him the right price and he
gets enticed by the look of his cards.  I agree that your pre raise should
of been 3 X raise just simply based off of what I already said and his desire
to see a flop with you cheap even with 20 bb's or so.  You have to price a
player like Timmy out because he also has position on you, and based off my
short read, he is one of the most dangerous players to play OOP with.  Obv
you are missing the flop majority of the time, and an optimal play might just
be to call/shove any non scary flop against you based off your own stack size
and image if he misses anyway.  He is also aware that at this point in the
tourney, you are just as afraid of taking a big hit right now and I might use
that on you if the board comes rags because then it would look like to you
(level thinking) that he might of peeled the flop with you with an ace rag hand
that so many people do in this spot.  Of course, I am not saying this as
some sort of an exact science or something, or like I know better type of
thing….it's just totally my opinion. Sorry…I just love talking HUD's and hands
😉

You were speaking too fast and I couldn't make out exactly what you said but
you mentioned a “EVGTO” or something to that affect, push
chart?  More info please 🙂