Home
(0 votes) 
September 12, 2015
Offline
As the title say, I would like to request a video or videoseries on timebomb tournaments on stars,
as it seems this is the new “thing” after the new schedule came up.
If it’s possible for someone to do a take on, that would be really appriciated 🙂
Thanks!
September 30, 2013
Offline
I would advice watching videos focusing on push/fold play and even hyper turbo sng’s. The format is crazy in timebomb and I wouldn’t play it more then to fill out once in a while if nothing better is available.
December 30, 2015
Offline
I agree. Not much different than a Hyper mixed with a satellite at the end. I’ve played a couple, 2nd in one and would have been 5th a couple of days ago but my power went out and when it came back on I was holding AJs in MP and just shoved. I didn’t notice it was the last hand. Got called by K3o and V hit a K. No need to risk there. Cashed for just 1.5x buy-in.
If I’m going to play Hypers I prefer the new 6-max Super-KO SnG with 24-36 seats. It only takes 2 KOs to break even. I played a series of them last night and out of maybe 7 tourneys I made 1st, 2nd, 4th (bubble) and got 1-2 KOs in all but maybe 2. In my 1st place run I think I scored 9 KOs and often got ~4-5.
These play really fast and are push-fold from the first hand, but I think it is great practice for this aspect of play. Interesting spots still come up. In one I had a big chip lead and the table suddenly went tight so I just started min-raising every pair, Qx, Kx and Ax hand and picked up a bunch of chips. Still, there is a skill-edge in picking spots.
Don’t get me wrong. It definitely takes some run-good. I could have easily gone 0-8 by losing the first race in each. The variance can be high. In fact there was one where I blinded down to ~300 chips from 500, picked up AA and got all in against another AA, then went card dead again and lost a random race.
December 30, 2015
Offline
Just to follow-up and prove a point. I went 6-0 playing some MTT SnG super-KO hypers yesterday. I only scored a single KO across all of these and busted the first hand in most. The variance is super high. I was happy with every decision I made, I just didn’t win the flips, or I won the first without a KO and ended up busting.
I’ve noticed the new STT Hypers start with the same 500 chip stack but have a few more levels (level 1 is 10/20 instead of 25/50 for example) so play starts with around 25BB. These may be better for practicing push-fold as they provide a little more opportunity for a skill-edge to make a difference…more play.
My final thought is that I need to ensure I’m risking a very small percentage of my bankroll on hypers to counter the variance. If I wanted to specialize in them I might make the volume needed to see a steady positive ROI (still playing with a smaller ABI), but with the small sample size I actually play I don’t think I can consider them a part of my on-going schedule. They feel too much like gambling to me. Not my style. I’m thinking I should be playing at something like 400 ABI of my bank roll compared to the 100 ABI I use for MTTs and normal speed SnGs (I take a higher than average risk because I’m still playing low enough stakes that I can deposit if I need to).
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
43 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
CSerpent
KJ
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12010
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1
