View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
sp_Search Search
Advanced Search
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Search Search
Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
FullTilt vs. Stars
swet1
Guest
Guests
1
September 7, 2010 - 12:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Is there any good reason that my results on Stars are miles ahead of my results on FullTilt? I don't understand why I can't seem to have a positive ROI on one site and have arounfd 100% ROI on stars. Sample size is about 200 games on each site.

Avatar
RonFezBuddy
New York City

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 2313
Member Since:
March 17, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
sp_UserWebsite
2
September 7, 2010 - 12:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

the structures are different.  FTP gives more play early but are shallower in the late game.  Stars is the opposite, less play early but more play late. 

 

Maybe your game is suited better to shallow stack play.

That said, 200 games on either site are really not enough of a sample to draw conclusions.  You could bink something on FTP tomorrow and have a better ROI there because it would have such a huge impact on your stats.

jshilling09
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 543
Member Since:
June 25, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
September 7, 2010 - 7:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

yeah i mean nothing means that much till you hit 1k games anyway.  Personally, I think Full Tilt is softer but I still play Stars because of the SNGs.  I'll probably get back to tilt in a month or two after I grind SNGs a little longer and play a mixed mid stakes schedule across both sites.  That's the goal at least.

ttwist

TPE Pro

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 1230
Member Since:
July 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
sp_UserWebsite sp_GooglePlus
4
September 8, 2010 - 4:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

maybe when you win on stars its more due to field size and your prolly just running good/bad respectfully you will prolly see that it will even out after 1500 tourneys played per site. and RFB makes a great point with regards to early/late structure

swet1
Guest
Guests
5
September 10, 2010 - 2:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

ttwist said:

maybe when you win on stars its more due to field size and your prolly just running good/bad respectfully you will prolly see that it will even out after 1500 tourneys played per site. and RFB makes a great point with regards to early/late structure

 

I do run horribly on tilt it is absolutely amazing to watch. That is why I play more on stars. Field sizes on stars are usually way bigger so that would make it more difficult to win there, shouldn't it?

sp_Feed
Go to top
Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
254 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Philbro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12007

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1

View Plans & Pricing