View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
Whats this dude shoving with?
savant111
Guest
Guests
1
February 22, 2011 - 1:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Alright guys it's my first hand at this table.  This guy insta 4 bet jams. The sheer speed of his jam made me really feel like he has kk-aa or Ak and just assumes i'm calling.  I guess his real range though is JJ-AA AQs, AKo, AKs. I'm getting a decent price, but it sure feels like a bad spot.

Two Questions)

1) What's your play

2) Does he ever show 77-99 here? If so I should definately call. 

 

Poker Stars $50 No Limit Hold'em Tournament – t200/t400 Blinds + t50 – 9 players

TournamentPokerEdge.com Hand History Converter

ganzonero (UTG+2): BB = 43.5, t17410

Hero (MP1): BB = 33.6, t13435

salehrol (MP2): BB = 31.4, t12552

zas2kar (CO): BB = 33.6, t13427

Schrazor (BTN): BB = 16.4, t6551

smsuwrestler (SB): BB = 12.2, t4876

Ghalys (BB): BB = 28.4, t11355

kingsofcards (UTG): BB = 34.5, t13819

nino7777 (UTG+1): BB = 28.6, t11429

Pre Flop: (t1050) Hero is MP1 with T of spades T of clubs

kingsofcards raises to t800, 2 folds, Hero raises to t2400, 2 folds, Schrazor raises to t6501 all in, 3 folds, Hero????

savant111
Guest
Guests
2
February 22, 2011 - 1:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

p.s how would you weigh his range here.

Thanks

southpaw_r32
Guest
Guests
3
February 22, 2011 - 2:47 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

1) First hand @ the table, I muck the TT..  You still have a stack to play with and he's not just jamming your 3bet, he's also jamming the UTG raiser and the other big stack in the CO still to act.

 

2) Does he show up with 77-99??? I don't play these buyin levels, so I can't say. But he does look strong with his jam. Range is pretty narrow imo.

savant111
Guest
Guests
4
February 22, 2011 - 2:57 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Tks for feedback Southpaw!

Since you mentioned the utg raiser. I should probably point out that he is a very laggy strong player (I think he won the live cardplayer player of the year last year). His range is pretty wide even though he is opening utg (don't know if villain knows this though).

G0liath
Guest
Guests
5
February 22, 2011 - 2:58 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

If I did my math correctly you need 4101 more to win a pot 14852. Which means you need around 28% equity in your hand to make the call break even. Against the range you specified you actually have 35.5% equity making it a mandatory call. Even if you take AQs out of his range you still have 33.6% equity, so you have to take AKo out of his range in order that this call be -Ev, which seems rediculous since AKo is a blatant shove for him with 16bb in his spot.

Almost a fist pump call given the odds you have even though you will lose the hand 2 out of 3 times (and thats if he’s as tight as you think he is).

southpaw_r32
Guest
Guests
6
February 22, 2011 - 3:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

embarassed Sorry, i misread the player names involved in the hand. (Thought the 31xBB “salehrol” had shoved)

 

Yeah I call this one.

savant111
Guest
Guests
7
February 22, 2011 - 3:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

It's 4101 to win 10,751 so I'm getting like 2.6ish to call.

Mathamatically (and my math might be off here) it's a slight fold as I have 35%ish to win and 2.6 + 1 x 100 =36ish.

I'll spoiler alert and say I folded the hand because it's a break even call and I'd rather keep the 25bbs.  But if my range is off my equity to win might be a whole lot higher than 35%.

G0liath
Guest
Guests
8
February 22, 2011 - 3:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

No it’s 4101 to win 14852 since your call is added to the final pot

savant111
Guest
Guests
9
February 22, 2011 - 3:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

That can't be true is it?

G0liath
Guest
Guests
10
February 22, 2011 - 3:31 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I’m pretty sure dude

savant111
Guest
Guests
11
February 22, 2011 - 3:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I'm 99.999% sure it's 10K:4K but someone will chime in eventually. What do you think the villains range is here.

cracker9ball
Guest
Guests
12
February 22, 2011 - 4:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I call a 16bb shove w TT after I open, more importantly before I open I will have looked at everyones stack and no who I am calling and who I might fold to if they shove or 3b.

Always have a plan.

Budr8cin
Guest
Guests
13
February 22, 2011 - 6:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

With 16bb I would assume villian has a very wide range. I’d plan on calling the 16bb jam. Like cracker said always have a plan.

ytseshred
Guest
Guests
14
February 23, 2011 - 12:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

savant111 said:

I'm 99.999% sure it's 10K:4K but someone will chime in eventually. What do you think the villains range is here.


I'm also pretty sure savant is correct unless I've been missing something this whole time, lol.  You're wagering the 4K to win an additional 10K, you don't count the money that you haven't put into the pot yet in the amount you could win if you call…

Avatar
RonFezBuddy
New York City

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 2313
Member Since:
March 17, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
February 23, 2011 - 12:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

There is actually a mixing of concepts here.  You are getting 2.6 – 1 but that doesn't convert to % the way you are doing it.  If you are going to compare your equity to your pot odds you have to consider the entire pot.  If you are putting in 4101 of a situation that is worth 14852 total.  Your call is costing you 27% of the total attainable pot.

 

fwiw, the general rule is that > 2 – 1 is a call in most cases.

 

I didn't do the pokerstove but assuming your hand has 35.5% equity is correct, this is a call.  While you are crushed sometimes, the presence of AK makes a huge difference.  There are 16 combos of AK while only 6 combos of each bigger pair. If JJ, QQ, KK are possible, in total there are only 24 total combos.

 

Your raise kinda commited you against the short stacks in the blinds.  Some shortstacks will also shove lighter here.  When you factor in some AQ and maybe even some 99s it will make it profitable because tbh his total stack isn't that big.  I'd just go with it and call it a cooler if they have a bigger pair.

G0liath
Guest
Guests
16
February 23, 2011 - 12:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

RonFezBuddy said:

There is actually a mixing of concepts here.  You are getting 2.6 – 1 but that doesn't convert to % the way you are doing it.  If you are going to compare your equity to your pot odds you have to consider the entire pot.  If you are putting in 4101 of a situation that is worth 14852 total.  Your call is costing you 27% of the total attainable pot.

 

fwiw, the general rule is that > 2 – 1 is a call in most cases.

 

I didn't do the pokerstove but assuming your hand has 35.5% equity is correct, this is a call.  While you are crushed sometimes, the presence of AK makes a huge difference.  There are 16 combos of AK while only 6 combos of each bigger pair. If JJ, QQ, KK are possible, in total there are only 24 total combos.

 

Your raise kinda commited you against the short stacks in the blinds.  Some shortstacks will also shove lighter here.  When you factor in some AQ and maybe even some 99s it will make it profitable because tbh his total stack isn't that big.  I'd just go with it and call it a cooler if they have a bigger pair.


thanks for clearing that up Diego, i was about to go put some serious work into my push/fold game…

 

Im pretty sure this is the reason i decided stick to percentages rather than odds when i first started poker since converting odds to equity confuses me

Avatar
RonFezBuddy
New York City

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 2313
Member Since:
March 17, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
February 23, 2011 - 12:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Yes, i find percentages so much easier to use than odds.

Cougars4444
Guest
Guests
18
February 23, 2011 - 4:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

This is why Diego is the man.  I'd call here as well.  Not in love with it but getting a pretty dang good price and so many more combos of AK.

flgtb786
Guest
Guests
19
February 23, 2011 - 4:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Never folding here. By the way the instajam I believe represents a weaker hand not the top of someones range

flgtb786
Guest
Guests
20
February 23, 2011 - 4:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I'm just jamming by the way not raising for <30% of your stack because raise folding that % of your stack that shallow would be bad.

savant111
Guest
Guests
21
February 23, 2011 - 11:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

G0liath: NH

Ronfez: Thanks for clarification. Ron do you have any suggestion about weighing the possibility of 77-99 in villains range? I weighed AQ by only putting in suited cards in poker stove. So only 4 of the 16 aqs went into that 35.5% (I probably should of put in 8) Does putting in one 77 combo two 88's and 3 99 combos sound right?

Ronfez/Cougars: 16 Ak combos is a great point and i think thats the piece of information I was missing.

 

flg: In this spot i really doubt the insta 4bet w that light. Maybe 77-99 was possible. Also i think jamming 33bbs is pretty bad. Raise folding like i did felt pretty gross too though smile.

 

Thanks for the feedback and clarification

Avatar
RonFezBuddy
New York City

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 2313
Member Since:
March 17, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
February 24, 2011 - 12:18 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

savant111 said:

 

Ronfez: Thanks for clarification. Ron do you have any suggestion about weighing the possibility of 77-99 in villains range? I weighed AQ by only putting in suited cards in poker stove. So only 4 of the 16 aqs went into that 35.5% (I probably should of put in 8) Does putting in one 77 combo two 88's and 3 99 combos sound right?

 

This is exactly how to weight hands.  I like the distribution you chose.


savant111
Guest
Guests
23
February 24, 2011 - 12:55 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thanks I'm 43.3% to win against that range which makes it a much easier call.  This will definitely help me in future tourneys!

Thanks to all

flgtb786
Guest
Guests
24
February 24, 2011 - 2:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I'm not saying he was light but what I'm saying was chances he had the absolute top of his range that you were giving him credit for wasn't likely thats all. For me with 16BB and pocket 10's here is go time you're flipping often more than enough to put the other 70% in.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
39 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12008

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1