December 30, 2015
Personally, in and Prog. KO, I think the best thing to do when deep is just play tight and use strong hands to trap. I really want to have a lot of chips when I get to the stage of the tourney where the early gamblers with nice bounties are on their way out and I can catch them as they fall. Chances are most people who run up big stacks early will lose them and that is the best time to have lots of chips. Bounty builders start at 8 minute levels and slow down to 10 then eventually 12 (very late) and I think a lot of people don’t think of these as regularly paced tournaments. These are big tournaments and can take 13 hours. People get addicted to the fast pace of the beginning and play it like a turbo.
Loosening up though, in calculated spots, the extra chips can be great for insurance and re-steal bounties. What I mean is, you can get in to re-steal side pots where the re-stealer may be a little lighter than the original all-in. the first all-in should be tighter knowing they have little fold equity with a bounty, and the bigger the bounty the more true this should be. Somewhat counter-intuitively, the bounty makes calling wider more correct as it sort of adds chips to the implied odds…but, greed too. The side pot not only serves as insurance in case you lose the main pot, you may also get the bounty for the re-stealer even if you lose the main pot.
https://www.pokerstars.com/poker/tournaments/rules/
The bounty is awarded to the player who wins the ‘relevant pot’ for the hand in question, which may be the main pot or one of several side pots. ‘Relevant pot’ means the pot in which the bounty player was all-in for their final chips.
I swear I’ve won bounties for the main pot without winning the side pot, but this sounds wrong after reading the rules here. I’ll have to look out for this in-game to see if I am right.
…that said, I try not to gamble in most spots. I’d rather be patient and wait for a strong hand and use the bounties to trap chasers. I often try to bet just enough so if the short stack goes all-in it will let me re-raise, especially if the short stack is right next to me and I want to let it generate action before it comes back around. I definitely watch for others doing this as well.
This TPE article is interesting. While it doesn’t deal with strategy related to chasing bounties or bounty chasers, or deep stack play, it is a good read: …..-strategy/
<insert not-a-pro-disclaimer here>
September 12, 2015
MovieFX said
Personally, in and Prog. KO, I think the best thing to do when deep is just play tight and use strong hands to trap. I really want to have a lot of chips when I get to the stage of the tourney where the early gamblers with nice bounties are on their way out and I can catch them as they fall. Chances are most people who run up big stacks early will lose them and that is the best time to have lots of chips. Bounty builders start at 8 minute levels and slow down to 10 then eventually 12 (very late) and I think a lot of people don’t think of these as regularly paced tournaments. These are big tournaments and can take 13 hours. People get addicted to the fast pace of the beginning and play it like a turbo.Loosening up though, in calculated spots, the extra chips can be great for insurance and re-steal bounties. What I mean is, you can get in to re-steal side pots where the re-stealer may be a little lighter than the original all-in. the first all-in should be tighter knowing they have little fold equity with a bounty, and the bigger the bounty the more true this should be. Somewhat counter-intuitively, the bounty makes calling wider more correct as it sort of adds chips to the implied odds…but, greed too. The side pot not only serves as insurance in case you lose the main pot, you may also get the bounty for the re-stealer even if you lose the main pot.
https://www.pokerstars.com/poker/tournaments/rules/
The bounty is awarded to the player who wins the ‘relevant pot’ for the hand in question, which may be the main pot or one of several side pots. ‘Relevant pot’ means the pot in which the bounty player was all-in for their final chips.
I swear I’ve won bounties for the main pot without winning the side pot, but this sounds wrong after reading the rules here. I’ll have to look out for this in-game to see if I am right.
…that said, I try not to gamble in most spots. I’d rather be patient and wait for a strong hand and use the bounties to trap chasers. I often try to bet just enough so if the short stack goes all-in it will let me re-raise, especially if the short stack is right next to me and I want to let it generate action before it comes back around. I definitely watch for others doing this as well.
This TPE article is interesting. While it doesn’t deal with strategy related to chasing bounties or bounty chasers, or deep stack play, it is a good read: …..-strategy/
Thanks for taking time to answer in such depth 🙂
I ended at 64th out of 9k starting, and yes, I figured it was a regular tournament, cus I wasnt in bed before 03:30 AM lol.
I’ll check the article out 🙂
Thanks again for answering my question 🙂
TPE Pro
December 6, 2012
Just try to play well and find good spots. There’s nothing magical about having a big stack that should cause you to deviate drastically from how you’d otherwise play, especially if no one else at the table is especially deep. Don’t be fooled by the idea that you can “bully the table” or “take big gambles” or something – those are common misunderstandings with no theoretical foundation. Mostly those chips will be there to cushion bad lucky you may run into later, whether that’s a cooler, a bad beat, a dry spell, whatever. Having a lot of chips shouldn’t really cause you to play much differently.
September 12, 2015
Foucault said
Just try to play well and find good spots. There’s nothing magical about having a big stack that should cause you to deviate drastically from how you’d otherwise play, especially if no one else at the table is especially deep. Don’t be fooled by the idea that you can “bully the table” or “take big gambles” or something – those are common misunderstandings with no theoretical foundation. Mostly those chips will be there to cushion bad lucky you may run into later, whether that’s a cooler, a bad beat, a dry spell, whatever. Having a lot of chips shouldn’t really cause you to play much differently.
Okey mate 🙂 Thanks alot!
TPE Pro
August 25, 2012
Yeah, just going to second what Andrew said, with one addition. The effective stack is the one that matters, so you having 200bb and your opponent having 100bb doesn’t change anything since you’re still 100bb deep (except in cases where you feel like being able to put your opponent at risk for their tournament life might make them fold more, but those are rare).
The exception is bounty builder or super KO/progressive KO tournaments – in those events, you need to be widening your range against players whom you cover, as there is an added incentive to play hands against them since you will pick up their bounties if you bust them. Being a big stack early on in a bounty-heavy tournament is a good reason to go all-out to pick up those bounties – you can sometimes pick up enough bounty money to effectively cash the tournament in level 3 or 4 if you run good early. Winning chips and busting people gives you the power to bust more people, so the tournament becomes exponentially bounty-heavy.
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
49 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1