View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
Understanding the Gap Concept
dbt
Guest
Guests
1
May 22, 2010 - 6:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

The term “gap concept,” first introduced by renowned poker author David Sklansky, refers to the idea that a player needs a better hand to call a raise than to open the pot themselves.

For example: if it is folded to you in middle position it may be correct to open-raise A♥ J♠; however, if you’re facing a raise from a tight player under the gun, A♥ J♠’s value shrinks dramatically.

This is clearly because an early-position player, when he raises, feels that his hand is already better than the rest of the table. After all, his raise has to make it through the entire table, and each player left to act could potentially hold a better hand.

If, however, he raises from late position, he is really only saying “my hand figures to be best against everybody else.” Thus an early-position raise holds a lot more weight than a late-position raise because it needs to beat more players.

Which is why when you are facing a raise, you should tighten up substantially. You must have a hand that is stronger than what you would have required to open the pot for a raise yourself.

This is to make up for two things: the lack of initiative you have from calling, and the fact that your opponent is telling you that he thinks his hand is strong enough to beat the field.

If your hand isn’t stronger than your normal raising range from that position, you risk “being dominated.”

Being dominated means you and your opponent share your biggest card but he has your kicker beaten. For example your opponent has A♥ K♥ and you have A♠ Q♣ – a recipe for disaster.

Playing a dominated hand can be extremely problematic, and this is why the “gap concept” was born. Those times that you do hit your ace you are going to end up spending a lot of money to find out you are second-best at showdown. The gap concept can help save you from many of those.

 

Chad Batista
Plenty of young guns think the gap concept is antiquated, but the logic remains the same.

 

What the actual gap is is by no means set in stone. Ultimately, the gap can shrink or grow depending on the player opening the pot and the situation.

If your opponent plays very nitty, then the gap may be very wide. If, however, your opponent is a loose-aggressive player, your gap might be very small or even nonexistent.

Many players feel that “the gap concept” is an antiquated piece of poker strategy, with no real place in today’s aggressive games. This is not true.

Although the rule itself has become a bit dated, the logic behind it remains the same. When you call, you want to have a hand that figures to be best now – or has good equity against your opponent’s hand.

dbt
Guest
Guests
2
May 22, 2010 - 6:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

ive always been one to call tight shove wide ect , but with todays game hyper aggressive lololol you really have to open your calling ranges in spots , and if you dont the better players will punish you long term, id like to hear some thoughts and see how this all applies to todays game ,

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
3
May 24, 2010 - 11:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thats some of my problems I think DBT.  I have been playing since the Moneymanker craze and I started by reading all the old books from Lee, Sklansky etc etc. I think in todays game if you play the way they suggest you need the deck to hit you hard and often or your stack is just going to evaporate from the heat.  Thats Phil Hellmuth and The Professors games and how many bracelets have they won recently in a Hold Em event.  We just arent dealt premium hands often enough to play that type of game especially if we are the only ones playing that way.  I want to work on closely watching my stack size to the blinds and adjust according to that ratio while constantly looking to target players and situations to steal from and slowly chip until I do see some premiums….easier said than done, I know.

MASTERHOLMES
Guest
Guests
4
May 25, 2010 - 6:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

on page 242 of the tournament poker for advanced  players , expanded edition

 

it is titled when the gap concept doesn’t apply

 

1. when the players have more way more chips then the blinds. (key part way more chips then the blinds , not necessarily at the early stages of the tourney)

2. you can then call raises with hands that are worse then the person making the raise, or even if you are skilled expert no limit player , worse then the raise you yourself would make in that situation.

3. you have position

4. you have expert knowledge of the deep stack play.

 

or another case where the gap concept doens’t apply is the person behind you when you make the raise has more chips then you so it is just a pittance for him to call you and cbet a flop where we are just trying to survive.

that is why the in 242 page section he says it is important to go all in the smaller the stack get in the later stages of the tourney then to raise as that first in equity is very important.

 

in a way this is important if you have a big stack ,, and you tighten up trying to maintain that stack,, it is easy for the blinds to catch up to you when if you keep playing loose ignoring the gap concept you could break aces , with sets, suited aces, connectors  and the right flop.

of course someone can take it to far and donk off their chips especially if they just built up their big stack and after a bit they lose it most to a suck out or a bad read and then they feel they have to start pushing to survive and in 2 hands they are out.

 

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
25 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

CSerpent

KJ

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12010

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1