February 8, 2017
PokerStars – 600/1200 Ante 150 NL – Holdem – 9 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
UTG+1: 60.07 BB
MP: 42.19 BB
Hero (MP+1): 41.08 BB
MP+2: 124.26 BB
CO: 12 BB
BTN: 40.2 BB
SB: 53.18 BB
BB: 58.72 BB
UTG: 37.38 BB
9 players post ante of 0.13 BB, SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 2.62 BB) Hero has K J
fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to 2.25 BB, fold, fold, fold, fold, BB calls 1.25 BB
Flop: (6.12 BB, 2 players) 8 J 9
BB checks, Hero bets 2.81 BB, BB calls 2.81 BB
Turn: (11.74 BB, 2 players) K
BB checks, Hero bets 8.46 BB, BB calls 8.46 BB
River: (28.66 BB, 2 players) 4
BB checks, Hero ?
$215 WCOOP, Villain seems solid over 100+ hands, no specific reads. Would expect better hands to raise the flop or turn but many flushes are now possible. I think a value bet is in order but I’m not sure about sizing. Sized turn in order to set up river shove (we have ~95% pot behind), but it might be hard to get value from enough hands after the flush comes in.
Do we bet <1/2 pot (and fold to a shove), shove, or check back? Would you play earlier streets any differently?
This is interesting in the fact that my Micro Stakes @ss can not come to a logical reason for any decision.
Here’s my though process: Would villain check/raise the top parts of his range on the flop or the turn? I would think so. I would think that a straight benefits from fast playing by preventing flushdraws from realizing their equity in case you have a hand like AKhh or AQhh that you’re likely cbeting this flop with. I would also think that a set might raise flop as well for protection against str8draws and flushdraws, and also get value from worse like over pairs or two pair hands. I would eliminate Straights and sets from his flop range. Being OOP, and with the board draw heavy, I would think those hands would put in a raise at some point. So I think he continues with Top pairs, flushdraws, straightdraws, and combos of the two.
I feel like the Kd was a pretty good card for you. I like your sizing on the turn. The river was kind of a scary card because all of the flush draws just came in. But what flushdraws is he calling flop and turn with? Probably mostly Ax, like AThh, AJhh, A7hh, and that’s probably it IMO. So with all of that in mind, I still have no idea. The way I have ranged villain to the river, you have ~62% equity against his river range. It might be best to just nit-up, check back, and realize it. Certainly I am not the best one to answer this but this is just my 2 sense.
** I should be a little more clear: the reason it’s an awkward river spot is because of your stack size. It would be even more awkward to bet river (not all in) and have to fold when he check-raises you. Mathematically, I am not sure, but that seems like a mistake. Plus, I don’t know that shoving is the right play either because are we really going to get called by worse?
So I don’t really know the right answer but I do know that your stack size makes things awkward! lol
July 24, 2018
I think the river is a bet fold. Even against an elite player who will turn some showdown value into a bluff (Ah9x for example), there is value from lesser 2 pairs that can’t be left on the table.
I say this away from the table; at the table I’d be checking back and hoping to take it down. This is a classic thin value spot that separates the men from the boys.
FWIW, it was my intuition that bet/fold was right; I am only so confident with thanks to my friend, PIO.
3for3 said
I think the river is a bet fold. Even against an elite player who will turn some showdown value into a bluff (Ah9x for example), there is value from lesser 2 pairs that can’t be left on the table.I say this away from the table; at the table I’d be checking back and hoping to take it down. This is a classic thin value spot that separates the men from the boys.
FWIW, it was my intuition that bet/fold was right; I am only so confident with thanks to my friend, PIO.
Danny, I think if you are going to say that this is a bet/fold, you have to at least tell us the sizing you would use. Because at this stack depth, we have less than pot left which makes things weird. Wouldn’t you agree?
July 24, 2018
This type of situation is a common one, when the front door flush gets there on turn or river.
At the low-medium stakes, live, those in Hero’s spot check back most or all non flush rivers which leads to:
Villains betting all of their flushes, which leads to:
Villains checking range being too weak (no nut hands), which leads to:
Hero being able to value bet lighter than GTO.
Yeah, that’s mostly true from my experience.
This tournament is a $215 WCOOP. Play will generally be better throughout the field. I think without know that villain is capable of calling worse, it’s hard to really make a case for the exploit bet.
On the other hand, you could always just jam it in. But I like this option less than checking back, because I don’t know how often we get called by worse, and he may just fold a hand we had beat anyway.
TPE Pro
December 6, 2012
Even when slightly +cEV, big, thin value bets are generally undesirable in tournaments because, much like big bluffs or hero calls, they are low-edge and high variance.
However, this does not strike as a small edge. My Pio sim has Hero pure shoving all his KJ, even without a heart. It assigns an EV of about 3.5bb to a shove with Ks Js.
It really isn’t that easy for Villain to show up with flushes (or any other hand better than yours) here. He had a lot of incentive to raise strong flush draws before now and to fold weak ones (Pio folds bare flush draws like 6h 3h on the turn). Oh and to donk them on the river. He should have some flushes in his range, but not nearly enough to make up the majority of his calling range. Remember, he needs to call 1/2 the time to make you indifferent to bluffing for a PSB. Pio also pure shoves K9 and K8.
I’m not even surprised that shoving is the best option. When I originally ranged this situation, we had ~61% equity on the river. With less than a pot sized bet behind, it makes sense to shove.
Id guess worse two pair call, everything worse folds. Occasionally we might run into a Qx flush draw. So yeah, shove seems like the best option.
February 8, 2017
Interesting stuff, thanks for all the responses. The option to check-back was a red herring, I think that would be a pretty big mistake. Might be fine to check vs. some players/populations but regularly checking in this kind of spot has to be a massive leak. River value bets are a huge source of potential profit.
My big concern was whether a shove could get called wide enough to be better than a bet/fold.
3for3 said
Yes, I guess the pot is too big to bet fold. Betting small and folding to a raise might be a good exploit against the most straight forward players, but I don’t think I’d try that in a $215 online against an unknown.
I think it’s fine to bet/fold in these games with an SPR<1. There are some players that I avoid doing it against. Not that I know they regularly check-raise river as a bluff, but they are good and/or crazy enough that I try to limit giving them extra opportunities to put me in a tough spot. That may change as I continue to improve.
Most players are going to be extremely weighted to value when check-raising the river in any hand, even more so when the SPR is so low. It’s rare that someone is planning to fold to a shove but then decides to bluff-raise because we bet small. Not that it doesn’t happen, but hard to imagine it’s happening often enough for us to be particularly afraid of it.
I’ve found a couple of low SPR spots to turn folds into bluffs recently due to villains’ bet sizing, but I’ve probably done it <10 times this year, and it’s not like they all worked. One of my recent attempts ended with me shoving into quads.
Foucault said
Even when slightly +cEV, big, thin value bets are generally undesirable in tournaments because, much like big bluffs or hero calls, they are low-edge and high variance.However, this does not strike as a small edge. My Pio sim has Hero pure shoving all his KJ, even without a heart. It assigns an EV of about 3.5bb to a shove with Ks Js.
It really isn’t that easy for Villain to show up with flushes (or any other hand better than yours) here. He had a lot of incentive to raise strong flush draws before now and to fold weak ones (Pio folds bare flush draws like 6h 3h on the turn). Oh and to donk them on the river. He should have some flushes in his range, but not nearly enough to make up the majority of his calling range. Remember, he needs to call 1/2 the time to make you indifferent to bluffing for a PSB. Pio also pure shoves K9 and K8.
Thanks for the feedback Andrew. I guess this spot isn’t nearly as close as I was thinking.
Not that I currently have the skill/balls to properly exploit it, but it strikes me that population is significantly overfolding to shoves on this kind of run-out, even at these stakes. Probably under-bluffing in this spot too, although I am much less certain about that. If we assume they defend a PSB 2/5 of the time, how much should that affect our shoving range? Would that be enough to turn some shoves into smaller bets?
I don’t imagine that it should change our decision with top two, but would we want to consider smaller sizing with something like K8/J9?
Maniackid11 said
If I had to guess one of two things happened: he checked and villain showed worse or he shoved and villain had some sort of weird flush draw. Does that sound right Gregors?
I shoved and villain tanked through his entire time bank before calling with KsJs for a very anti-climatic chop. I probably wouldn’t have doubted the shove if he hadn’t tanked for so long, but it really made me question what worse hands we get called by. Probably just this particular villain’s tendencies (or reads they had on me) rather than anything that should be extrapolated to other situations.
TPE Pro
December 6, 2012
FWIW I gave Pio the option of a smaller river bet and it didn’t use it, even with worse two pair. Just because V tanked with KJ doesn’t mean he would fold J8. It’s entirely possible he’d (wrongly) perceive no difference in value between the hands.
It’s also possible that the field isn’t overfolding here but rather is making mistakes on earlier streets, eg overfolding flop/turn or taking too many flush draws to the river.
February 8, 2017
Yeah, safe to say that I need more experience/sample size to do the Make a Read part of the 4-step Exploitative Process for the $109 – $215 population before I can Identify the Exploits.
I was seeing tons of hands where Reg A bets flop/turn then shoves <=pot on a river that completes an obvious draw, and Reg B tanks river and folds (or occasionally snap calls with an extremely strong hand). However, just today, I must have seen 7 or 8 hands where Reg B called it off pretty light in exactly the same kind of spots.
So easy to think I see patterns and forget that ~35k hands at these stakes is maybe 5% of the hands it would take to make any strong ‘player pool’ reads.
Probably should just bite the bullet and finally pick up PIO so that I can get better at step 1 🙂
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
32 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Philbro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12007
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1