If we’re not getting called by worse when we shove (which I agree with) then it seems like we can’t even consider shoving, unless we’re trying to turn QQ into a bluff, which I don’t think is good either since we have so much SDV.

I don’t particularly like the turn raise, you’re right not to be especially worried about the player left to act behind but it’s unlikely the first player would lead out there with many 7x or 5x hands in the first place – they might be a loose passive fish but that’s a fairly vague definition of their playing style, so some HUD stats would help. In any case, there are two players left to act, so leading out with 7x or 5x would likely be very bad in villain’s spot. I’d expect to see more checks than bets, especially if they lean further towards the passive side.

I think your turn raise is pretty thin, but I could see it being okay. Would prefer to make it a little smaller though, around 650 or so to give villain better odds. The BB can still have plenty of Ax hands so we don’t want to inflate the pot beyond the point where they can continue with 7x.

I think you played the hand okay, as long as you didn’t shove river. You’ve already come to the conclusion yourself that you’re never getting called by worse, so the only reason to shove is as a bluff, which isn’t necessary here.

One other thing – the title of this post isn’t really very clear. It makes it sound like you’re berating your opponent for not folding, or maybe you’re asking whether you should shove river for value, or something else. It’s better to title your posts something like “QQ raise turn and decide river versus passive villain”, since that gives more information about what you’re actually asking by posting it. Not to mention, calling your opponent a fish and laughing about them indicates a bit of a mental game leak. As Tommy Angelo says, “your opponents are like trees on a golf course” – there’s no reason to laugh at them.