View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
stars nightly 70k nearing the bubble
dbt
Guest
Guests
1
June 11, 2010 - 12:52 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

PokerStars Game #45351371545: Tournament #315011084, $50+$5 USD Hold’em No Limit – Level XI (400/800) – 2010/06/10 22:26:34 MT [2010/06/11 0:26:34 ET]
Table ‘315011084 54’ 9-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: 444446 (28649 in chips)
Seat 2: SUPER00TILT (34097 in chips)
Seat 3: Crawfdad (10197 in chips)
Seat 4: pat_beast (20700 in chips) is sitting out
Seat 5: zedveron (5870 in chips)
Seat 6: SouthcJay7 (30347 in chips)
Seat 7: DBT7 (24601 in chips)
Seat 8: ShawtyAflush (31280 in chips)
Seat 9: rreeno (27917 in chips)
444446: posts the ante 75
SUPER00TILT: posts the ante 75
Crawfdad: posts the ante 75
pat_beast: posts the ante 75
zedveron: posts the ante 75
SouthcJay7: posts the ante 75
DBT7: posts the ante 75
ShawtyAflush: posts the ante 75
rreeno: posts the ante 75
SouthcJay7: posts small blind 400
DBT7: posts big blind 800
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to DBT7 [Ks 9h]
ShawtyAflush: folds
rreeno: folds
444446: folds
SUPER00TILT: folds
Crawfdad: folds
pat_beast: folds
zedveron: folds
SouthcJay7: raises 1600 to 2400
DBT7????  

 

k the thing is i now southcjay7 well from ap sngs ive played 1000000s with him although i do believe hes tightened up quit abit over the years he also knows my game well but he has raised my blind the last 3 orbits like 206 left 201 payed how bad is jamming in this spot . i doubt i cant 3 bet fold here also i really hate flatting here your thoughts please ,

Avatar
RonFezBuddy
New York City

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 2313
Member Since:
March 17, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
June 11, 2010 - 2:41 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Let’s do the math on a shove. 

 

3875 in the pot once he opens.  you have 23801 behind.

 

Your stack is pretty ideal to open into, so I think from the SB can we assume he opens like 75% or more.  If you jam on him I think he only calls like 5.4%

 

equity     win     tie           pots won     pots tied    

Hand 0:     72.749%      72.40%     00.35%           76861492        370857.00   { 99+, AJs+, AQo+ }

Hand 1:     27.251%      26.90%     00.35%           28559642        370857.00   { Ks9h }

  • He only calls you 5.4/75 = 7%
  • When he does call you, you win 22201 (his call)+3875 (whats in the pot after he opens) = 26076 but only 27.2% of the time
  • you lose 22201 *72.7% of the time
  • But, 93% of the time you win 3875

 

When called

.07                           *  ((26076*.272) + (-22201*.727)) = -9047

times you are called        what you win + what you lose

.07                           *  -9047= -633

 

When he folds

.93 * 3875 = 3603

 

EV

-633+3603 = +2970

 

Shove is +EV but very high variance.  Question is, do you agree with my opening and calling ranges.

bigdogpckt5s
Guest
Guests
3
June 11, 2010 - 7:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Its to many chips to shove imo. And I know the history you guys have in sngs so 3 bet folding kinda is bad in this spot. I think I would just fold. There will be better spots.

rh300487
Guest
Guests
4
June 11, 2010 - 9:45 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I agree w/bigdog that it’s a lot of chips to shove. I like it more if stack sizes where reversed since he risks to bust and we don’t. A fold might be better, also because we only have to move up 5 / 6 spots to get ITM. In general I don’t think we should play to min cash, but we shouldn’t risk not cashing when it’s not necessary either.

I think it’s a fold because I don’t think villain will open here 75%+ of his range most of the time. Especially since he’s been active and he might tighten up a bit. I think close to 40%-50% would be more accurate (of course it’s just guessing). His calling range I agree (5.4%).

So let’s change those numbers and see the cEV off a shove then.

Math:
Villain will call our shove ( 5,4% / 50% =) 11% of the time. 

 

cEV =
folds = 89% * 3875 = 3448,75
call/win = 11% * 27,30% * 26076 = 783,06
call/loose = 11% * 72,70% * -22201 = -1775,41
cEV = 3448,75 + 783,06 + -1775,41 = 2456,40

 

I think a re-steal should increase our stack with 10% or more to make it worth the risk. We start the hand with ~24K and 10% of 24K = 2.4K (= 3BBs). 
If we make more then 2,4K I think it’s okay to shove, if we make less I think we should fold.

If we range him with 75%+ openings range, then we have a clear shove here. This also helps with the fact that we tell him to slow down and stop raising our BB and give us a little more respect. So I shove for sure against this openraise range.

If we range him with 50% openings range, then a shove would show 2456,40 T$ profit and it becomes on the edge. However, I think because his range is so wide and he raised the previous three times as well and it would be good to make a stand, I think shoving turns out to be a good play here. 

 

@RonFezBuddy
I did the same math as you (* with your numbers) because I didn’t understood why you did two times 0,07% * xxxxxxxx. But now I understood your why. The answer underneath isn’t correct (It doesn’t make it logical when you read it).

.07                           *  ((26076*.272) + (-22201*.727)) = -9047

You better write it down like this:

.07                           *  ((26076*.272) + (-22201*.727)) = -633
.07                           *  -9047 = -633

Just makes more sense for people to understand, imo.

Avatar
RonFezBuddy
New York City

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 2313
Member Since:
March 17, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 11, 2010 - 10:19 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

ah you’re right i can see how that would be confusing…yeah it’s the last line that is relevant for the .07 calc

dbt
Guest
Guests
6
June 11, 2010 - 11:40 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

bigdogpckt5s said:

Its to many chips to shove imo. And I know the history you guys have in sngs so 3 bet folding kinda is bad in this spot. I think I would just fold. There will be better spots.


 

i agree dog we do have history however i had watched him open extremly light , and i watched him raise call 30 bigs 2 times 1 time showing q5 suited the other time 10 7 off but looking back i like a fold my stack is alittle big

dbt
Guest
Guests
7
June 11, 2010 - 11:41 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

ty for the input and the math guys

Avatar
RonFezBuddy
New York City

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 2313
Member Since:
March 17, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
June 11, 2010 - 11:48 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

This hand is intriguing me.  I mean it’s clearly +EV even with a 50% opening range, and not by a little – by nearly 3bbs at least.

 

We’re on the bubble and he covers us so there is $EV to consider here, although in the 50/50 it’s such a small dollar amount (~$75 usually right?) – i’d prefer to not care about the money in this situation.

 

Yet, big dog advises we fold and I can’t disagree.  I feel like 30bbs is a huge shove too.  However, if all math is pointing to shoving why do we want to fold here.

 

big dog, what stack size makes this a shove for you?

plessis204
Guest
Guests
9
June 11, 2010 - 11:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

does the fact that we never do this with AA/KK (in villains eyes when putting us on a range?) mean anything?  We don’t do this with AA/KK right?

dbt
Guest
Guests
10
June 11, 2010 - 12:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

RonFezBuddy said:

This hand is intriguing me.  I mean it’s clearly +EV even with a 50% opening range, and not by a little – by nearly 3bbs at least.

 

We’re on the bubble and he covers us so there is $EV to consider here, although in the 50/50 it’s such a small dollar amount (~$75 usually right?) – i’d prefer to not care about the money in this situation.

 

Yet, big dog advises we fold and I can’t disagree.  I feel like 30bbs is a huge shove too.  However, if all math is pointing to shoving why do we want to fold here.

 

big dog, what stack size makes this a shove for you?


 

 ya it was a weird spot for me. i had looked in the lobby and blinds were due to increase to 500/1000 in 2 mins giving me 24 bigs and seeing how much southcjay7 was opening however hes been known to call me extremly light. i watched him open and then call a reshove 2 times he had q5 suited and anther time showed 10 7 so hes clearly raise calling light and had been raising my button the last few orbits , ive never been 1 to care about busting on the bubble but my stack size verses his i felt i had good fe most of the time given the bubble situation. however if he is calling this light im not sure how profitable it is longterm but in this spot verses a guy whos opening light alot im probally shoving just about anything that flops well with my stack size and 5 to the money not sure if its a leak. but i think i get enough folds here longterm , and ron i agree the math supports a shove but im not 1 to disagree with bigd im curious as to what hands he might jam in this spot like any pair suited cards most aces  so maybe 22+ kq+ ace10+ 67s + 9 10 + i just hate my stack sizing here 5 bbs either way makes it alot more playable imo 5 less shove 5 more i cant probally 3 bet fold to a shove .

dbt
Guest
Guests
11
June 11, 2010 - 12:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

o ron the buyin was the nightly 70 grand on stars 50 buyin 50+5   uaslly around 1400 in the fields around 13k to 1st paying out to around 200 ish

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
12
June 11, 2010 - 2:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

So what should we be taking away from this thread? As a new player to MMTs I take away several things.

 

1 The Math says its a shove ( but we dont always time to figure the math in the battle, we just need to know that its probably correct giving what we know about our villians hand range)

2 Our stack size is ackward too big to shove to small to 3bet and flatting is just horrible.

3 That if we do shove the villian may call with anything and we are just gambling when we have enough chips to not make this a MANDATORY shove

4 We can find a better spot

 

** I like what Casey says sometimes “Im just not feeling it.”   This hand with this info would probably give me that feeling**

 

Any other things I missed about this discussion?

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
28 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

CSerpent

KJ

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12010

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1