Home
(0 votes) 
I had jammed several times to get back my stack since an unfortunate hand. original opener was active. 3bettor had raised folded a couple of times? opinions
Poker Stars $10+$1 No Limit Hold'em Tournament – t3000/t6000 Blinds + t600 – 9 players
TournamentPokerEdge.com Hand History Converter
dwy621 (UTG): BB = 13.1, t78312
pipelry (UTG+1): BB = 11.6, t69740
BEOWULF88 (UTG+2): BB = 24.3, t145972
SAMSONisGOD (MP1): BB = 18.4, t110549
CARLOSPP (MP2): BB = 31.8, t190610
Infinito46 (CO): BB = 17.2, t103193
tucci 007 (BTN): BB = 4.5, t27058
Hero (SB): BB = 21.7, t130088
cartonplein (BB): BB = 9.6, t57322
Pre Flop: (t14400) Hero is SB with J
J
2 folds, BEOWULF88 raises to t18000, SAMSONisGOD raises to t109949 all in, 3 folds
June 22, 2010
Offline
His shove looks strong from MP1, he could be making a move, but I do not think it is worth the risk calling. You still do not know what the other player will do. I would let it go, if you were the only left to act I may considering shoving. Do you have any HUDs stats you could run his PFR% in Pokerstove against your JJ, see where you stand.
"Your either in Sheen's Korner or your with the trolls."
I know it sucks but the 3x open from UTG+2 with 24bb's and the shove with 18bb's from MP both look strong. I find a fold here but jamming it in is not bad either imo because you could potentially get a stack that puts you back in it to win it. I think you need a slightly better read than you have described to be able to make a call, i fold.
Yea I could probably find a fold here, but I would be probably pulling the same move from samsons view if he doesn't shove.
“Get it in.” MVP
IR's range is fairly wide since you say he's been active. 3 Bettor has also been opening some hands, so he's probably capable of 3betting a wider range than 2.5%, more like 10%. If you c ai and IR c aswell, you're crushed. But I think w JJ you'll do pretty wel vs the ranges and IR will fold a pretty high % of his opening range.
Call me nitty but I lean toward a fold here, but it would be close for me. When it's close like this and I have around 20BBs I look at when the blinds are going to increase. If they will be going up in the next orbit that will lean me to a shove… anyone else do this??
October 6, 2010
Offline
in this spot, you are 48.6% against 99+, AQs+, AKo, which i think is about as tight as villain's range gets. there could be a whole bunch more stuff in here including AT,AJ, KQs, 66-88 etc etc.
if we extend the range to 66+, ATs+, KQs, AJo+, then we are 58%
imo that is pretty decent equity against any sort of range, and i would get it in here.
(btw i am assuming original opener folds which i think is a good enough assumption give that he has been active – if original opener wakes up with QQ+ then good on him but that would be a very smal part of his range obv)
bennymacca said:
in this spot, you are 48.6% against 99+, AQs+, AKo, which i think is about as tight as villain's range gets. there could be a whole bunch more stuff in here including AT,AJ, KQs, 66-88 etc etc.
if we extend the range to 66+, ATs+, KQs, AJo+, then we are 58%
imo that is pretty decent equity against any sort of range, and i would get it in here.
(btw i am assuming original opener folds which i think is a good enough assumption give that he has been active – if original opener wakes up with QQ+ then good on him but that would be a very smal part of his range obv)
This looks about right. With the dead money in the pot this is a no brainer. Nice analysis benny
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
24 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1
