Situation I just had at Lock Poker: $2T, 6-max;blinds 15/30. I have 2060 chips and hold JJ on the BTN. HJ has 4240 chips (he called an all-in bet with 99 vs. KJ and hit a riv 9) limps for 30. I raise to 120. Blinds fold, HJ calls. Flop comes Js 2h Qs. With 270 in the pot, I bet 200. I make this type of bet early in micros because it often helps defines someone's range for me if they call that kind of bet. HJ re-raises to 400. 

Immediately I know he either has a set with 2s as he would have more than likely open-raised with QQ, or he's on a flush draw – probably the flush draw. So, my choices are to call and go to the turn, or 3-bet all-in.

I shove, he snap calls with ———- K3ss. My first thought was, he called my pre flop raise with this? Oh well – cool! Turn comes Tc. Rive comes 8s. Not cool.

Afterward, I thought that perhaps I should have called his raise because I was confident I had the best hand post-flop and if he was on a flush draw and missed the turn, when I bet it would have given him more pause to think about calling down ~ 80%-20%, or 4:1 going into the riv. At the same time, since I saw him call an all-in shove with 99 when his opponent all but showed with his previous bets that he'd hit his K on the flop for a pair, I felt getting it in post-flop would likely result in me walking away with 2060 of his stack because he showed spewness.

Which would you have done: called the raise to 400 and gone into the turn and perhaps shoved the turn, or 3-bet shoved as I did before the turn?

Thanks guys…

Postscript: I feel it important to add this… I wanted to play this 6-max because I feel I have a problem with consistent aggression, in general, and a 6-max turbo forces a player to be aggressive or succumb to the fast action and the rapidly increasing blinds. I felt going in that doubling-up early – within reason, play-wise – is an important component to being able to maintain aggression and continuing to open my range in good spots as the blinds increase.