View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
Should I pat myself on the back for being a boss? Or punch myself in the mouth for being a dingbat?
The Riceman
London UK
Hitting The Circuit
Members
Forum Posts: 731
Member Since:
February 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
June 9, 2016 - 5:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0
Hand Conversion Powered by WeakTight Poker Hand History Converter
No Limit Holdem Tournament PokerStars
7 Players
$7.34+$0.66
Blinds 1.5k/3k 7
UTG kallesahl 21k
UTG+1 Menotti 21k
MP anhbasaigon 33k
CO owlsova 26k
D tmbrkw 63k
SB Hero 67k
BB supergenna 39k
Preflop
7 6.6k Hero is SB 6 6
4 folds, tmbrkw raises to 6k, Hero goes all-in 66k, 1 fold, tmbrkw goes all-in 57k
Flop
2 134k, 2 all-in K T 8
Turn
2 134k, 2 all-in 4
River
2 134k, 2 all-in 7
Final Pot 134k
tmbrkw shows a pair of Kings K A
Hero shows a pair of Sixes 6 6
tmbrkw wins 130k (net +67k)
Hero collects 3.6k (net –63k)

Hey TPE buddies!

So here I am leading a final table in a 180 turbo.

So my understanding of ICM theory is that big stacks should bully medium stacks, medium stacks should play conservatively, and short stacks need to take calculated risks to double up.

According to this, it is not ideal that the button is another bigstack. However, there are a few <10bb stacks at the table.

Pretty simple question really…was I right in taking advantage of the shorter stacks and threatening the button with elimination by shoving?

Or was this an ICM mistake, and I should rather have focussed on abusing the medium stacks?

I think the former…but I’d love to hear your thoughts! Thanks…

Mark.

(Oh and before anyone says something…I ran this through HRC…all it would show me is a calling range if Button shoved. 

I even tried an advanced analysis).

I would love to know how to set the thing up to show me what my 3-bet shove range should be as played, ie with Button raising non all-in… is this possible?

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
June 9, 2016 - 6:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

In HRC, you need to do an Advanced Hand. This will enable raises of less than all in. You can set sizes for the first raise, second raise, etc. It’s best not to allow limping or flat calls, because of the unhelpful way in which HRC handles them.

After getting a preliminary output from HRC, it’s best to adjust button’s range manually. Because the blinds are not allowed to flat call, HRC will show a wider opening range for BTN than is really profitable. You should narrow it at least a bit, unless you believe button will be opening wider than optimal. Then lock that range, recalculate, and the output should be what you are looking for.

I haven’t actually run this, but seems like a pretty straight-forward shove to me, neither dingbat nor boss.

The Riceman
London UK
Hitting The Circuit
Members
Forum Posts: 731
Member Since:
February 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
June 9, 2016 - 6:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thought so! 

Thanks Andrew…

But this is partially what I fear in poker…the true bosses will rise to the top; the dingbats will eventually give up through sheer frustration…and the seething, writhing, uncertain…”neither dingbat nor boss” majority will continue as they are…”breaking even”, or slightly losing.

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
June 9, 2016 - 6:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I don’t mean to imply that there is some more boss way to play this hand. I just think it’s a straightforward shove, clearly the best play but one that ought to seem standard to you, not some super amazing boss move.

The Riceman
London UK
Hitting The Circuit
Members
Forum Posts: 731
Member Since:
February 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 11, 2016 - 5:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

No I wasn’t making any kind of point. 

I am not sure what I was really saying, other than that I fear I belong to the “neither boss nor dingbat” camp…

I suppose for winning players to exist there needs to be this inequality though.

I was pretty much sure the hand was a shove, and I didn’t hesitate in game, but I guess the central theme I was wondering about after was whether due to ICM considerations I would have been better off avoiding the other big stack, and concentrating on abusing the medium stacks. 

I was wondering whether perhaps shoving over the one stack who threatened me with elimination was an ICM disaster, or whether I was correct to abuse the situation.

Just an ICM thing is all.

BTW sorry for the silly thread name, I had drunk a couple of lagers!

And thank you for the HRC advice Andrew…I really appreciate the time you give to us all! I was thinking about this today.

(No I knew it wasn’t a ” boss” move lol, but I wasn’t sure whether it was the right play or an ICM mistake).

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
23 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12008

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1