View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
Question about putting villain on a range early
derSchwartz
Sunday Major
Members
Forum Posts: 258
Member Since:
November 4, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 14, 2014 - 9:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Hello TPE,

Forums and videos are teaching me that I need to get better at putting villains on hand ranges consistently, every time I'm in a hand.  It feels like I sometimes do it but others I don't, especially if I'm playing more than two tables.

I feel more capable of ranging a villain after playing them for a while and getting their style somewhat somewhat figured out.  Before that, I find myself often in a position when I don't know what to make of the villain's action.  This comes out in different ways on different streets, but especially treacherous are the ways in which I'm unsure of a villain's style preflop, considering that we need to start narrowing ranges from the beginning of a hand.

My question(s) is/are:

When narrowing a villain's hand range, how do you account for not knowing yet a villain's tendencies with their different categories of hands that make up their flatting ranges, raising ranges, flop floating ranges, etc.?

For example if it's early, we raise from mid position with 50bb and the button flats with 40bb, but has already shown a likeliness to play passively, how might we range him and how do we react if we seem to have been wrong?

Do we assign him a full range that includes everything he might flat with, but make note that we weight it againt premiums and a certain marginal range, then eliminate those outlying possibilities later in the hand?  “22-AA, A2s+, A8o+, K9s+, KTo+, 56s-QJs, JTo, QJo, but TT-AA are unlikely as are K9s, 56s-78s, JTo, QTo, QJo”

Or do we say, “premiums and very marginal hands are unlikely and not in his range,” range him on what we think he probably flats with, (say  “22-99, A2s-AQs, A8o-AQo, KTs-KQs”) and then be ready to change that range on the turn if we seem to be wrong and now it looks like he has something we didn't put in his range, like 56s or AA?

Perhaps the answer is sort of both, or maybe it's something totally different.

I could the answer being “yes, be willing to change his range as the hand continue, even when you do think you've figured out a villain and it's the late stages.”

Thanks for reading.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
12 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12008

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1