Home
(0 votes) 
September 15, 2015
Offline
Game started at: 2015/12/11 10:31:46
Game ID: 528407062 250/500 $400 GTD TURBO KO, Table 3 (Hold’em)
Seat 9 is the button
Seat 1: whiteboxprop (5130).
Seat 2: panheadjim (4350).
Seat 3: criativus (8293).
Seat 4: Vidok11 (5240).
Seat 6: d1nonly111 (9680).
Seat 7: L3g3nd25 (8580).
Seat 8: DRofBooya (3879).
Seat 9: Collar (10558).
Player whiteboxprop has small blind (250)
Player panheadjim has big blind (500)
Player DRofBooya received card: [10d]
Player DRofBooya received card: [7h]
I’ve been working on my push/fold game and while I don’t love SNG Wizard, I’m using up the 30 day trial I have before I pony up for something else. I felt like I should shove here but didn’t, feeling like button would call me too wide. So I ran this through SNG Wiz and ICMizer and came up with different results. ICMizer says I should be pushing 37% in this spot. SNG Wiz says I should be pushing any 2. When I adjusted calling ranges in the wiz, which I’m not completely sure I did correctly, it still said to shove 98%.
So I folded and of course the flop came with two sevens and I bashed my head against the wall. J/k about that last part, but I ended up busting from MP a couple hands later with 33.
Regardless of the results, what’s the right play here? Conflicting softwares are confusing.
February 14, 2013
Offline
havent used sng wiz in forever, but I dont see how that can be correct. the 37% sounds pretty reasonable; Im thinking maybe something with the K.O. is messing up the results?
June 11, 2012
Offline
i assume and only assume that the difference between the two is one is calculating cEV in this spot and the other $EV
compared it to what holdemresources says with payout winner takes all.
you can do it on their page
June 23, 2014
Offline
Yup, agree with FlorianM1. Most likely you need to change it to cEV as $EV is only useful in playing cash.
The Daily Grind One day at a Time
“What separates those who go under and those who rise above adversity is the strength of their will and their hunger for power.”
― Robert Greene , The 50th Law
October 16, 2012
Offline
Ive been doing work on the same thing in recent times. I got bored in a tournament break and ran it through the holdem resources push fold calculator for you, that came up with 40%. 10 7 suited or 10 9 off suit makes the cut – so correct fold according to that.
TPE Pro
August 25, 2012
Offline
It does sound like one calculator was doing ICM while the other was doing cEV. There’s no other likely reason for such a big differentiation.
FWIW, I personally believe HoldemResources Calculator to be the best calculator on the market for these kinds of things. I would recommend that one if you’re going to purchase one (which is necessary if you’re serious about improving).
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
74 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
ThreeClubs
Habanerra
CSerpent
KJ
Tillery999
sdmathis89
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12012
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1
