View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 5 Topic Rating: 5 Topic Rating: 5 Topic Rating: 5 Topic Rating: 5 Topic Rating: 5 (1 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
push/fold?
folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
September 2, 2015 - 10:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

#Game No : 718683091
***** 888poker Hand History for Game 718683091 *****
$100/$200 Blinds No Limit Holdem – ***
Tournament #71965543 $1.35 + $0.15 – Table #23 9 Max (Real Money)
Seat 5 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: Regu_1_Lator ( $2,380 )
Seat 2: thechiefguy ( $5,605 )
Seat 3: RYAN_COKE8.0 ( $5,770 )
Seat 4: Vojin1509 ( $2,340 )
Seat 5: london_ace ( $5,001 )
Seat 6: jrfan883 ( $2,000 )
Seat 7: VenZiCo ( $2,345 )
Seat 9: isakov31 ( $2,890 )
Seat 10: weeve2010 ( $3,160 )
RYAN_COKE8.0 posts ante [$25]
Vojin1509 posts ante [$25]
isakov31 posts ante [$25]
weeve2010 posts ante [$25]
Regu_1_Lator posts ante [$25]
thechiefguy posts ante [$25]
london_ace posts ante [$25]
jrfan883 posts ante [$25]
VenZiCo posts ante [$25]
jrfan883 posts small blind [$100]
VenZiCo posts big blind [$200]
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to london_ace [ 9diamond, Qheart]
isakov31 folds
weeve2010 folds
Regu_1_Lator folds
thechiefguy folds
RYAN_COKE8.0 folds
Vojin1509 folds
london_ace ?

 

hey

 

This is a turbo.

reads – bb is a reg, does not really get out of line, plays pretty solid. No reads on the sb.

i’m not sure how wide either opponents are calling a shove pre?

 

cheers.

Mike Bizz
Flounder
Members
Forum Posts: 10
Member Since:
August 20, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
September 3, 2015 - 12:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

the blinds are 1/2 its not really worth exchanging chip stacks with him this early if he does wake up with a hand? I don’t mind min raising or limping.. just my blunt opinion.

folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
September 3, 2015 - 9:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

we need to figure out if its ev+ to shove here. As there’s only two players left to act there’s less chance someone being dealt a strong hand, so we don’t have to worry about that. It really depends on how often these opponents are calling/folding. If they fold a ton shoving here would be profitable with any two! but if they call a lot we can tighten up a little bit and shove hands that play well against a wide calling range. Shoving A2o would be fine , a hand like 57s would be okay to fold here vs a wide calling range.

 

can anyone figure if we shove here if its ev+, assuming sb is calling 20% of the time and bb is calling 20% of the time, doubt these players are calling more often then this?

joelshitshow
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 582
Member Since:
February 20, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
September 4, 2015 - 8:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

You’re getting called 36% of the time if those stats are true. This doesn’t include 3-bets, right?

Another thought: what do those percentages have to be to make you want to raise 2.5x or 3x instead?

GunnJD
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 131
Member Since:
August 10, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
September 5, 2015 - 8:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
5

I think QJo, possibly QTo, would be the bottom here. Easy question for HRC. 

Of course, when villains are not calling correctly we can end up jamming wider, so maybe Q9o could be okay. 

Even though it is a turbo, I’d rather have a bet/fold and bet/call range here. People are just going to fold so much and we can fold to their nuts when they shove. When they flat we can outplay them in postion cool.

Foucault’s review of Carlos’ Bovada 100k win touches on some spots like these, though a bit different situations. Check out Igrindthis’ series for good push/fold ranges too, perhaps that is more appropriate here.

lapp3r30
Winnipeg, MB, Canada
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 176
Member Since:
July 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
September 5, 2015 - 4:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

11bb effective… Here’s your shoves.

42.7% – 22+ Ax+ K2s+ K6o+ Q5s+ Q9o+ J7s+ J9o+ T6s+ T9o 96s+ 86s+ 75s+ 65s 54s

clubdiamondheartspade
folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
September 5, 2015 - 10:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

@joel….i’m not sure what u exactly mean, but  If you were going to raise 3x and one of those players shove you’ll be getting really good odds on a call ya know. I Really don’t see any merit in r/f in a spot like this, i really dont lol. Even if they are nitty , i’d rather shove then r/f tbh…

 

@gunn, why would you want to have a b/f range here?

 

@Lapp …where did u get that range from? if you shove that range from BT you’re pretty much breaking even right? I mean if these guys call wide , we really should fold the bottom of that range and exploit them by shoving a bit tighter. 

lapp3r30
Winnipeg, MB, Canada
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 176
Member Since:
July 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
September 5, 2015 - 10:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Jennifear charts.

folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
September 5, 2015 - 10:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

if we 2x pre here and bb shoves we are going to be getting around 1.8 to 1 , we are going to need 35.7% equity on the call , so we should be calling here pretty often. We should want to avoid situations where we are getting good odds with a hand that we don’t really want to call a shove with.

if we put v on a range of 33+ A5s+ KTs+ QTs+ JTs+ KJo+ QJo. 

Q9o is going to have 36% equity vs that, so it becomes really close. 

 

And this is why i’d much rather fold or shove in this spot, if i were going to choose i think shoving here is better rather then r/f. 

 

if we had a hand like say 52o our hand would have 30% equity vs that exact range , so i guess we could have a r/f range with the bottom of our range as we know that our hand does not have enough equity to call a shove. so yeah i guess we should have a r/f range here against opponents that are not going to play back often on the blinds. 

folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
September 5, 2015 - 11:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

to be precise we are getting 1.7 to 1 which means we need 37% equity. Even so Q9o has 36% equity , its still rather close anyhow 🙂

 

 

it’s just that it came up as 1.77 so i thought we should round it up as 1.8 to 1. 

 

total pot = 3045

 

hero has to call 1720.

joelshitshow
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 582
Member Since:
February 20, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
September 6, 2015 - 1:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I didn’t see their stacks. The reason I suggested a larger open was because if they flat too many hands out of the blinds, they are getting worse odds to do it. If they were deeper, a larger open could make sense (provided you balance your range when opening larger).

folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
September 11, 2015 - 3:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Totally agree, though against weaker players you may decide to be unbalanced right?

folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
September 11, 2015 - 3:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

but at the same time making it larger may not make a difference because if v tends to call pre often with a wide range of hands and u know they are capable of calling big raises pre with those then there’s no point really unless you think you can outplay them post flop or if u think they c/f a ton to c-bets. On the other hand if we know V calls pre often and does not c/f to c-bets then we could just tighten up our range. There is no wrong in that imo. 🙂

joelshitshow
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 582
Member Since:
February 20, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
September 12, 2015 - 12:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

This sure sounds familiar. It must have come up in a podcast or a thread here recently. The topic was whether it’s important to balance your range against someone who won’t notice that you’re balancing your range. (For example, he’s too busy playing his own hand to notice that you have one, too.)

I don’t remember the outcome. My reaction was that others at the table can notice your play as well. Another point could be it’s good practice to always balance your range. But I wish I could remember the advice given by others. Hope someone else can chime in here.

It’s definitely a good practice to induce opponents into making negative EV plays. So for example if they’re going to call a preflop raise anyway, raising bigger makes sense, provided your range is ahead of theirs. These two points seem like they could conflict, unless you raise larger with premium hands, but then isn’t that a sizing tell? Or does it not matter against these types of opponents because they won’t notice your sizing is different anyway?

folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
September 12, 2015 - 6:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

you’re right that if they’re going to call a pre raise anyway you’d want to make it bigger with your value hands and if that’s the case you can play exploitativley. If you were only raising big with your value hands and raising small with your weaker hands and vice versa that’s exploitable for sure! for instance if we know v is going to call often pre and calls a lot otf and c/r a ton then making it larger pre with our value hands is good but what about our bluff range? against this opponent i’d rather fold.  On the other hand we may want to construct a bluffing range against an opponent that always calls your raise pre and does some weird s*** post?

 

 It’s not easy imo..what i do know is that our value range widens thats for sure , a hand like JTs which is a semi bluffing hand becomes a raise for value vs an opponent like that because our hand does well against their calling range. 

 

be nice for a pro to give their view’s on this concept.

 

 

I personally don’t think its important to balance your range against an opponent that does not play a balanced strategy. 

GunnJD
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 131
Member Since:
August 10, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
September 14, 2015 - 12:40 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

joelshitshow said
This sure sounds familiar. It must have come up in a podcast or a thread here recently. The topic was whether it’s important to balance your range against someone who won’t notice that you’re balancing your range. (For example, he’s too busy playing his own hand to notice that you have one, too.)

I don’t remember the outcome. My reaction was that others at the table can notice your play as well. Another point could be it’s good practice to always balance your range. But I wish I could remember the advice given by others. Hope someone else can chime in here.

It’s definitely a good practice to induce opponents into making negative EV plays. So for example if they’re going to call a preflop raise anyway, raising bigger makes sense, provided your range is ahead of theirs. These two points seem like they could conflict, unless you raise larger with premium hands, but then isn’t that a sizing tell? Or does it not matter against these types of opponents because they won’t notice your sizing is different anyway?

I’m still trying to get the hang of spots like these. Had one tonight on the button where BB, SB, and BTN all had about ~18bb. 

Jamming a range in accordance with Nash is going to be +EV. 

What factors make min raising better? I find it super difficult to have a clear and balanced range for opening and then folding in these spots. Hands like KJs, for example, may be a call against some opponents, but jamming it will always be +EV (if only slightly). 

Having bits of information like “my opponents jam a very small range under 20 bb”, could make another strategy better. 

In a vacuum, however, and especially against playing against anonymous players on Bovada, I think balance is super important.

folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
September 14, 2015 - 5:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

People are just going to fold so much and we can fold to their nuts when they shove.

 

we can’t assume they have the nuts when they shove , unless we know they really tight and we think that they’ll be shoving narrow range. In this spot a hand like KJs will like nearly a close call if sb/bb 3-bet shoved over our raise and thats even if we think they are shoving a somewhat tight range of hands. We just don’t wanna put ourselfs in situations like that , i’d much rather shove on the button with KJs then r/f. I doubt a tight player will be TOO tight in this spot anyhow as they are short and facing a button open. Thoughts on that?

you could argue and say V won’t have much fold equity when they do 3-bet shove and they should also know that hero is not r/f too much when we’ve raised vs 2 shorties in the blinds which would mean they won’t be 3-bet shoving really wide in this spot. Though our hand would be good enough to call vs a somewhat wider value range. If we really think they are shoving a tight range like 88+ AJs+ KQs we have like 35% equity so you could fold if you like as we need 37% equity to break even, so yeah it’s rather close even vs a tight range , if v is shoving a little bit wider then that , KJs becomes a very very easy call.

folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
September 14, 2015 - 6:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

one factor that makes mini raising better is when we can exploit our opponents on the blinds , i.e tendencies. I mean if they fold to much we could have a r/f range in this spot and that would be with a very weak range. r/f the bottom of our range we may also decide to shove the middle of our range and r/c with the top of our range. That may become rather exploitable though.

 

if the blinds are really tight , wont it be better if we just shove the bottom/middle/top of our range so that we are balanced..

bitdash
Lighting Money On Fire
Members
Forum Posts: 26
Member Since:
July 22, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
September 17, 2015 - 5:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

it is +cEV to shove here effective stack is 10bb if sb call, 11bb if bb call.

so you can push all-in pretty wide here.

(46.0%) 22+,A2+,K2s+,K5o+,Q4s+,Q9o+,J5s+,J9o+,T6s+,T9o,96s+,98o,85s+,75s+,64s+,54s

most opponents in SB, BB spots here are not calling with nash equilibrium range here (SB = 29%, BB = 32%), they are probably tighter in calling.  so you probably can push wider than 46%

folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
September 17, 2015 - 7:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

@bitdash , if sb or bb is calling very often we could fold the bottom of the range of those hands which you listed above and shove a bit tighter, pretty much exploiting our opponents which will make us more money.

 

when we are read less should we assume that most opponents don’t play nash? from what i know most opponents play tighter then nash, much better tighter, so i’d assume its the latter.

bitdash
Lighting Money On Fire
Members
Forum Posts: 26
Member Since:
July 22, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
September 17, 2015 - 1:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

most wont call all-in wider than nash equilibrium in small stakes MTT unless he’s drunk or you have been shoving often lately (table dynamics/game flow), if we think they are calling wider, then yes we should reduce our pushing range.  

 

with that said, shove here is +cEV but not necessary the MOST +cEV.

if you assume your opponent is only going to all-in AA here and fold everything else :D, then min raise and fold to all-in might be better (i didn’t go and calculate for this, just trying to give an extreme example)

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
38 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12008

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1