View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 1 Topic Rating: 1 Topic Rating: 1 Topic Rating: 1 Topic Rating: 1 Topic Rating: 1 (1 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
Possible Colussion?
Avatar
ShootingGallery
Windsor, ON
Home Game Champ
Members
Forum Posts: 35
Member Since:
August 5, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
August 10, 2013 - 7:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
1

I got my first Royal Flush today, and that was cool.  But aside from the sick brag, does the way these two oppents played this hand look like colussion to you or what?

We're down to like 20 people left here:

 

Poker Stars $0.45+$0.05 No Limit Hold'em Tournament – t75/t150 Blinds – 9 players – View hand 2279754
TournamentPokerEdge.com Hand History Converter

MP1: t3645 24.30 BBs
MP2: t1210 8.07 BBs
CO: t2675 17.83 BBs
Hero (BTN): t1905 12.70 BBs
SB: t1525 10.17 BBs
BB: t516 3.44 BBs
UTG: t2260 15.07 BBs
UTG+1: t8370 55.80 BBs
UTG+2: t1205 8.03 BBs

Pre Flop: (t225) Hero is BTN with T of diamonds A of diamonds
UTG calls t150, UTG+1 calls t150, 4 folds, Hero raises to t1905 all in, 2 folds, UTG calls t1755, UTG+1 calls t1755

Flop: (t5940) J of diamonds 2 of spades K of diamonds (3 players – 1 is all in)
UTG checks, UTG+1 checks

Turn: (t5940) Q of diamonds (3 players – 1 is all in)
UTG checks, UTG+1 checks

River: (t5940) 7 of spades (3 players – 1 is all in)
UTG checks, UTG+1 checks

Final Pot: t5940
Hero shows T of diamonds A of diamonds (a Royal Flush)
UTG shows Q of hearts A of spades (a pair of Queens)
UTG+1 shows A of hearts K of spades (a pair of Kings)
Hero wins t5940

"Remember, play tight. Nothing less than 83 suited."
Play Good, Run Good.

Ch1pCh0p
Woodstock Ontario
Grinding Micros
Forum Posts: 52
Member Since:
July 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 10, 2013 - 7:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Na, no collusion here, checking down in a 3 way pot when 1 player is all in is pretty much standard. Scary board for both of them.
Congrats on the Royal. I have been playing for 4 years and have had only 1

Grow some Balls and get it in

bennymacca
Adelaide Australia
Road Gambling with Doyle
Members
Forum Posts: 2616
Member Since:
October 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 11, 2013 - 5:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

yeah i dont think it is collusion. 

 

otherwise only the one with AK would have called pre

 

its pretty standard to check down when there is no side pot 

redvulture61
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 124
Member Since:
June 1, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
August 11, 2013 - 8:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Yeah this is standard no collusiion or atleast or direct collusion. There is no incentive for these players to bet in a side pot with nothin in it with 1 pair hands.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
54 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12008

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1