Home
(1 votes) 
May 14, 2015
Offline
I'm thinking of buying some poker software to help my game, which poker software do you recommend, PokerTracker or PokerOffice? I read somewhere it's a personal preference, but does one have better features than others?
The second question is about using them, what do you gain from using poker tracking software? I've had a little play with them and found the stats given out interesting, but I've yet to see anything which jumps out of me that will improve my game. Could someone tell me how they use the software to improve their game.
Thanks,
Chris
April 26, 2013
Offline
I'd recommend Holdem Manager (2). Or Holdem Manager Cloud, should be out soon.
I don't think many people use PokerOffice, but Pokertracker or Holdemmanger is probably a matter of choice, though I heared that HM2 is more customizable.
April 6, 2015
Offline
Having used both PokerTracker and Hold Em Manager, I prefer Hold Em Manager by miles. The HUD on screen while playing is great on both, but I find HEM a lot easier for analysing statistics, a lot more intuitive, and studying with it once having a sizeable database has helped my game no end. Only disappointing thing is it doesn't work on Mac so if you have a Mac then PT4 is your main option.
November 24, 2013
Offline
PlasticPearl said:
Having used both PokerTracker and Hold Em Manager, I prefer Hold Em Manager by miles. The HUD on screen while playing is great on both, but I find HEM a lot easier for analysing statistics, a lot more intuitive, and studying with it once having a sizeable database has helped my game no end. Only disappointing thing is it doesn't work on Mac so if you have a Mac then PT4 is your main option.
Funny, Im using HM2 but Im currently thinking about moving back to PT (already had PT3), just waiting for a good offer. I dont find HM2 very intuitive and its also very resource-intensive even on my modest database and couple of small things about the HUD (and the way you can adjust it). When PT4 came out it worked very bad on my system but I recently tested it again and its much better now. Anyway, its correct that its a matter of preferences, poker office may be ok too. All programs are offering free trials so you should def use that.
April 6, 2015
Offline
Fire said:
Funny, Im using HM2 but Im currently thinking about moving back to PT (already had PT3), just waiting for a good offer. I dont find HM2 very intuitive and its also very resource-intensive even on my modest database and couple of small things about the HUD (and the way you can adjust it). When PT4 came out it worked very bad on my system but I recently tested it again and its much better now. Anyway, its correct that its a matter of preferences, poker office may be ok too. All programs are offering free trials so you should def use that.
That's cool, it's all choices. I don't think there's much between them at all. Actually what I did like about the HUD on PT4 was you could set it so that it was transparent until the mouse hovered over which made it easier to see the action.
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
10 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1
