View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 1 Topic Rating: 1 Topic Rating: 1 Topic Rating: 1 Topic Rating: 1 Topic Rating: 1 (1 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
pocket9's Defend
Cass
Lighting Money On Fire
Members
Forum Posts: 30
Member Since:
March 8, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 17, 2015 - 3:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0
Hi i'm new at TPE... I can't complain for anything I'm really enjoying every vids and articles that I saw/read so far...
Just a little doubt about this hand. I lead out for balance on the turn and I don't have info of Villain is a new table:
 
PokerStars Hand #132196010735: Tournament #1168442266, $5.00+$0.50 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (40/80) - 2015/03/17 10:52:01 ART [2015/03/17 9:52:01 ET]
Table '1168442266 62' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: leandroM13 (2123 in chips) 
Seat 2: PichooARG (2725 in chips) 
Seat 4: voldemar.a (7742 in chips) 
Seat 5: Voelender (3877 in chips) 
Seat 6: DIGIPAGES (1613 in chips) 
Seat 7: Ned_bg (6210 in chips) 
Seat 8: sosamatik (3640 in chips) 
Seat 9: Crazy Rübe (5475 in chips) 
leandroM13: posts the ante 10
PichooARG: posts the ante 10
voldemar.a: posts the ante 10
Voelender: posts the ante 10
DIGIPAGES: posts the ante 10
Ned_bg: posts the ante 10
sosamatik: posts the ante 10
Crazy Rübe: posts the ante 10
leandroM13: posts small blind 40
PichooARG: posts big blind 80
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to PichooARG [9h 9c]
voldemar.a: folds 
Voelender: folds 
DIGIPAGES: folds 
Ned_bg: folds 
sosamatik: folds 
Crazy Rübe: raises 120 to 200
leandroM13: folds 
PichooARG: calls 120
*** FLOP *** [8h 5s Ah]
PichooARG: checks 
Crazy Rübe: bets 171
PichooARG: calls 171
*** TURN *** [8h 5s Ah] [8c]
PichooARG: bets 395
Crazy Rübe: folds 
Uncalled bet (395) returned to PichooARG
PichooARG collected 862 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 862 | Rake 0 
Board [8h 5s Ah 8c]
Seat 1: leandroM13 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: PichooARG (big blind) collected (862)
Seat 4: voldemar.a folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: Voelender folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: DIGIPAGES folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: Ned_bg folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: sosamatik folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: Crazy Rübe (button) folded on the Turn
What do u think of the line as played? And how we continue if he raise (prob fold is good here?) or in the river play?
thanks…
P0larbear79
Playing Freerolls
Members
Forum Posts: 13
Member Since:
January 29, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 17, 2015 - 5:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I'm new here too so maybe not so qualified to analyze your hand but I'll try and give my thoughts. We're all here to learn and get better, right?

It folds to Crazy Rube on the button so he/she is going to open pretty wide here and you call. They C bet for 1/3 pot (171 into 530) if I did the math right and you call. I'm thinking they C bet here 100% of the time to rep the A so your call is fine, you are going to be ahead here a lot. The turn pairs the board and you lead for just under half pot.

I think I check-call in this spot for pot control and also try to let the villian continue to bluff with his hand. You also say that if they had raised you probably fold, so in that case maybe you don't want to bloat the pot out of position because you have showdown value. The board is not super wet, no real straight draws but there is the heart draw. I guess you are trying to get more value out of your 99s, and maybe protect them against an over on the river, but when you lead the turn I think you are mostly getting called by better hands (A's or 8's) or maybe the heart draw but it is less likely. If you check and they check behind I would just reevaluate on the river with the plan to check call most rivers.

Hope that wasn't too bad!! 

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 17, 2015 - 11:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
1

Nice job p0larbear, I think you're on the right track. You're definitely right about the button's range being too wide to check-fold the flop. Although it's true that Hero will often lose the pot if the turn bet is called or raised, that doesn't necessarily make the turn bet bad (though it does give incentive to bet small).

If we had reason to think that button would keep bluffing at a high frequency, then check-calling again is best. I expect many players to check behind here often, though, first because many people just don't double barrel that often and secondly because this is a good card for Hero's range. When Hero check-calls the flop, Ax and 9x make up the majority of her range.

This makes it very unappealing for Villain to bet the turn either as a bluff or as a value bet with all but the strongest Ax. Many Ax hands will now prefer to check back turn and either call or value bet rivers.

Because this is a card that benefits Hero's range significantly, Villain will want to check it often, which gives Hero a lot of incentive to develop a donking range.

There are many hands in Hero's range that would prefer Villain not check behind, and when you bet all of them you can create a nice, balanced range that is very difficult for Villain to play against:

a. Monsters like 8x do not want to give Villain the opportunity to pot control. Donking these hands extracts more value than checking from Ax and avoids giving a free card to draws. It also protects the weaker hands in Hero's betting range by punishing Villains who float or bluff-raise this bet.

b. Vulnerable hands like 99 do not want Villain to get a free card that could improve him to the best hand or set up profitable bluffs. Betting with these hands serves mainly to prevent Villain from realizing his equity with weak hands.

c. Floats/draws also want to prevent Villain from playing pot control. Leading the turn can force Villain to fold some better hands that might improve or have an easier time calling on the river. This bet also sets up double barrels and punishes Villains who fold to much to either the turn donk or to a river bet. Because there are many draws in this range, Hero will have plenty of value betting and bluffing opportunities on a variety of rivers.

Besides the fact that hands in categories (b) and (c) would prefer to make small bets anyway, there are several theoretical reasons why Hero ought to bet small:

a. Even before we see the turn, Hero's range is stronger than Villain's. Villain can and probably should bet any two cards on the flop, whereas even allowing for some OOP floating Hero will still fold a lot of air to the flop bet.

b. The 8 is a better card for Hero's range than for Villain's. Hero probably has more 8x in his pre-flop range than Villain, and after calling the flop her range is certainly more 8-heavy than Villains, especially as many players will check back some 8x here in Villain's shoes.

c. Hero's donking range is pretty strong. It contains a fair number of nutted hands, hands like 99 with a good bit of showdown value, and even most of the weakest hands are relatively high-equity draws. Consequently, Villain can't profitably call the bet with weak hands even when getting pretty good odds.

Hero's sizing is about as big as I'd go, and I think 1/3 or even 1/4 of the pot is not out of the question. Very nice hand Cass, and nice post P0loarbear!

Cass
Lighting Money On Fire
Members
Forum Posts: 30
Member Since:
March 8, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
March 18, 2015 - 5:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0
Awesome analysis… I didn't go so far with the thinking on the bet sizing the reason that I make it almoust half the pot it's for no give him great odds to chase the draws, but now I think its go all the other way.

In the 1° point C when "Hero will have plenty of value betting and bluffing opportunities on a variety of rivers"

I think unless we have some sort of info as how V plays on turn or river and we get flatted, when we are tottaly blind as we are now, our betting on the river with 99 will be any card lower/or an 8 non-heart (this could apply also to when we hold the draws or any other pockets).

When we c/f we balance this line with decent value hands that we wil c/c to induce a bet of some missed draws, thin value bets or whatever.

And our bet sizing on the river could by a little bigger than half the pot?

thoughts on this?
Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
March 18, 2015 - 6:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply I'd ever bet 99 on the river. I just mean bluffing/value betting opportunities with other parts of your range.

Cass
Lighting Money On Fire
Members
Forum Posts: 30
Member Since:
March 8, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
March 18, 2015 - 7:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thanks, I was confused with that point, that clarifies the idea

folding_aces_pre_yo
High Stakes Mario Kart Propping
Members
Forum Posts: 1133
Member Since:
September 14, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
March 18, 2015 - 8:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

nice post.

 

I'd play my value/bluff range this way, so that could be c/c flop and lead turn , though i wouldnt donk lead a hand like 66/77/99/TT/JJ/QQ/KK here , i'd c/c and re-evaluate river.

 

So lets say our turn bet gets called by v and the river is Kdiamond  ,what would villians range look like?

 

when v calls turn there range will consist of flush draws , Ax , PPs (hands with SDV)

 

so which line do u guys take otr ,c/c or b/f? 

Cass
Lighting Money On Fire
Members
Forum Posts: 30
Member Since:
March 8, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
March 20, 2015 - 1:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

imo I really like the lead out with including that range that u say (although KK,QQ,JJ I would 3-bet pre flop) leaving out

66/77/99/TT, and on the river go for c/f, specially without info of V, I think here more than not we are going to be really bad in a river Kd, foucaults covered all the reasons for leading out but I think on V range here it's not going to be bluff heavy I think plus we might my inducing to get a bet for a missed draw and even if the river it's a Kh thats a good river card to bluff also… we might be inducing a bet… so I don't think V will by bluffing to much after the turn lead out with no info.

 

thoughts on this?

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
March 20, 2015 - 11:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

folding_aces_pre_yo said:

nice post.

 

I'd play my value/bluff range this way, so that could be c/c flop and lead turn , though i wouldnt donk lead a hand like 66/77/99/TT/JJ/QQ/KK here , i'd c/c and re-evaluate river.

 

So lets say our turn bet gets called by v and the river is Kdiamond  ,what would villians range look like?

 

when v calls turn there range will consist of flush draws , Ax , PPs (hands with SDV)

 

so which line do u guys take otr ,c/c or b/f? 

If you're only donking Tx and bluffs on the turn, then you should bet a lot bigger than what I recommended for the wider range.

Why are c/c or b/f my only options on the river? Seems like a pretty clear c/f to me. A lot of his heart draws paired the K, and you block some busted hearts.

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
March 20, 2015 - 11:59 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Cass said:

imo I really like the lead out with including that range that u say (although KK,QQ,JJ I would 3-bet pre flop) leaving out

66/77/99/TT, and on the river go for c/f, specially without info of V, I think here more than not we are going to be really bad in a river Kd, foucaults covered all the reasons for leading out but I think on V range here it's not going to be bluff heavy I think plus we might my inducing to get a bet for a missed draw and even if the river it's a Kh thats a good river card to bluff also… we might be inducing a bet… so I don't think V will by bluffing to much after the turn lead out with no info.

 

thoughts on this?

It sounds like you're saying that because this is a good spot to bluff, Villain won't bluff that much, which hopefully when I phrase it that way you see the problem with that logic.

Good bluffing situations are good for a reason. You have to fold some hands even though you know your opponent could be bluffing, because he could also value bet a lot of hands.

In this case, it's OK to give your opponent a profitable bluff, because he had to call the turn in order to get to this situation, and you will sometimes bluff the river and prevent him from realizing his bluff equity. So he can't just call with a weak hand on the turn hoping that you'll check the river so he can bluff.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
65 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12008

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1