View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
plays available to us with different stack sizes
LoobyLoo
Guppy
Members
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
December 14, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 4, 2017 - 1:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Hey all, I am new to MTT’s and new to the site. Fantastic resource, thanks to all involved. I cannot get enough – there just are not enough hours in the day!

I am interested in hearing thoughts on stack sizes and the plays available to us at each stage. I know it is a huge subject and covered all over TPE but as a noob I feel I need some guidelines in a nutshell. 

Before I found TPE I created this table based on chapter 11 in The Raiser’s Edge book:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yWiLVfBgUXj2zHW_mM0qRA0S_03jB67xafuG4tTEDcY/edit?usp=sharing

Of course the book was written in 2000 so I was wondering if anything has changed drastically in this respect. I don’t expect so as stack sizes/pot odds don’t change but I would be grateful for your comments and thoughts on current trends.

The Riceman
London UK
Hitting The Circuit
Members
Forum Posts: 731
Member Since:
February 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
January 18, 2017 - 3:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Lol I just looked at the chart. 

Brother, I think you should take that down pronto. Then send me a copy. It can be our little secret!

It is a part of the solution to the game itself!

I love your chart. The dudes who wrote Raisers Edge were also involved with Kill Everyone and prior to these Kill Phil. 

These are serious math based tomes. And very well respected. A lot of work will have gone in to all their information. I expect the vast majority of their work is mathematically accurate…and therefore timeless.

I studied philosophy at university.  I remember very little. I was out of my freakin’ mind almost the entire time. I do, however, remember them talking about “A Priori” knowledge. I was taken with the notion that in whatever galaxy which might exist, in the furthest star system, even in every dimension which might exist in whatever plane of consciousness you can dream up…

One plus one will always equal two. Mathematics, the language of nature, is the only knowledge system we can be absolutely certain about, and this will remain true for ever more and applies and will apply anywhere science might one day take us.

You simply cannot argue with mathematics, and it is the main reason I love poker so much.

LoobyLoo
Guppy
Members
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
December 14, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 20, 2017 - 1:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thanks for your reply I think you studied Kant, and clearly absorbed it somehow.

He said thoughts without content are empty, intuitions without concepts are blind.

Never be content to know how until you understand why and keep breaking it down until you get to the core.

It’s turtles all the way down, man!

And it’s sister 😉

Turbulence
Falkirk, Scotland
Showing Marc Alioto How Its Done
Members
Forum Posts: 768
Member Since:
July 7, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 21, 2017 - 11:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Excelent table, wish i had had access to that 10yrs ago. Probably could have if i had the book then lol. 

That looks to be a pretty solid strategy and excllent basis to work from and will keep you right for the most part. The only things that seem to have changed in later years is the below 25bbs play. There is a trend to attempt UTG steals with min raises from >15bb stacks and also raise folding from these stacks as well. I would say these are nuances and personal preference. 

In turbo mtts you can effectively apply the principles but almost 1/2 the stack size it applies to. 

aka Prophead340 aka Prophead2000 aka Turbulence_1

PocketFives Profile: .....urbulence/

The Riceman
London UK
Hitting The Circuit
Members
Forum Posts: 731
Member Since:
February 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
January 21, 2017 - 4:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Ahhh yes Kant. I just Wikipedia’d that old fool!

I remember him. I remember pure logic. That did my nut mate. I remember thinking “I Kan’t understand this nonsense”. 

Syllogistic logic.  Tony is a man. All men are deviants. Tony is therefore a deviant.

That is not anti man. It is, rather, a necessary truth.

Tautology.  Wikipedia gives the example “all bachelors are unmarried”. I guess this is also a necessary truth. 

But none of these examples are as pure as straightforward maths. At least, they are logically necessarily true through the filter of language. An alien being can relate immediately to “1+1=2”.

For him (or her) to deduce that “all bachelors are unmarried”‘ he would need to speak English for a start.

Thinking about it though, I guess “all bachelors are unmarried” could be considered a mathematical equation somehow.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
82 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Philbro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12007

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1