…I mean post flop. I hate my limp in here.

Foucault said
You really shouldn’t be doing much limping behind when shallow. There’s just not room for speculative plays. Either you have a hand with a lot of equity, in which case raising is generally better, or you don’t, in which case folding is generally better. It’s not a range you should be questing to widen.

Great advice. This is one area of my game that has me spinning. I find habitual limpers cause me to make mistakes a lot. I don’t know if I should ignore them outright, open bigger or limp behind. 

Has TPE ever done a video series or podcast on this?

Some insight in to my confused thinking: 
 – I tend to just add the limps in and open bigger. For example, where I might open 2.2BB I’ll open to 3.2BB.
 – I think I default to limping behind a lot (more than I want to admit) with hands that are lower in my open-range just because I don’t want to open bigger and if I open for 2.2BB I’m guaranteed a call (and probably invite more callers).
 – I guess I should take the view that iso-ing a wide-opener for under 1BB is a pretty cheap way to exploit
 – I’m starting to wonder if some people who limp 50% of hands are actually playing it as an intentional style. I’ve seen enough bad players limp hands and the suddenly raise with good hands, but I’ve also run in to a few players that seem to limp their entire range and play their image in a self-aware way, only investing further in made hands and good draws. Their range is super hard to narrow down and I’ve handed over a lot of chips when I’m dominated because I feel safe betting my KQ on a Qxx board when V has limped AK (3 times last night, once going bust with K9 turned TJxQ).