After discussing this with a few people, I have started to add limping the small blind to my game as an adjustment. If the player in the big blind is particularly weak and gives me a lot of folds preflop or on all flops they miss, I will continue to raise a very wide range, simply because I'll be picking the pot up. If they have shown to play back or get annoyingly sticky such that double or triple barrels are required more often, I'll throw in limps with scattered parts of my range. It's uncommon that I have had many bvb spots so that enough of my whole range is exposed, but I'll like limp with some part of my range and then limp a monster and move around like that, going back and forth. I haven't done enough limping to see it's affect on my game, really either. It just sounds good in practice, and a lot of people whose game I admire have suggested it. I think it comes down to table and gameflow. I play on bovada, so there's a lot less paying attention going on and you can get away with weird stuff.

The last situation I can think of with a lot of blind vs blind play was late of day1 of a $350 800k prizepool tournament. Multiple flights still, but no one's punting their stack every single hand this late in the flight like they would in the beginning. I had been very much in charge of my table. I got the best of every one at my table in all the big pots, and most were afraid of me. Because of this, the big blind just routinely folded to me. I don't know if this was because he had a bad distribution of hands and never wanted to come back at me with absolute garbage, or if he was actually folding middling postflop hands, but food for thought.