View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
Multi-tabling, ROIs and hourly rates
theginger45
Guest
Guests
1
February 17, 2012 - 6:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I've been grinding turbo 180s and MTTs for a while now and the number of tables I play has fluctuated a lot. On my current PC I can play up to 30-32 tables without everything starting to lag, but at that point I'm usually really struggling to spend more than a second or two on any decision, so I feel like I'm missing a lot of spots. However, playing that many tables has allowed me to get in an extra 40-50 games in a day, which over a month would equate to around an extra 1k games.

 

My question is whether there's a way to really work out your ROI and hourly to the extent that it's possible to know whether you're playing the right amount of tables? I have a suspicion that optimal tables for me is somewhere between 18 and 24, but I feel like if I went for the lower end of that I'd be cutting a few hundred games off my monthly volume which could hurt me. What's more beneficial in the long run, putting in the hours and volume in order to conquer the swings, or maximising your ROI and improving your game? I think I have a little bit of an obsession with volume, which might be the result of running bad for a few months. Perhaps cutting down to around 20 would be beneficial if I can still get in 200 games/day.

Funnnuraba
Guest
Guests
2
February 17, 2012 - 8:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Depends on what your priorities are.

If your goal is to improve your game and move on to higher stakes I would strongly suggest cutting down on the tables and also take 1 or 2 days a week to analyse your game. Playing fewer tables will not only strongly increase your winrate, but will also allow you make better decisions and LEARN from them, which is necessary if you want to become a better winning player and move on to higher stakes.

If on the other hand you are so adept at multi-tabling and you do not miss spots you can certainly increase your hourly rate by playing many tables, but you are paying the price in lowering your ROI and missingthe chance to improve. If you are missing spots you should definitely play fewer tables!.

running0uts
Guest
Guests
3
February 17, 2012 - 9:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

If you are talking purely about overall income then you can work it out. Calculate your average profit per hour when 30 tabling and compare it to average profit per hour when 20 tabling. Whichever number is higher is more profitable for you. The difficulty in doing this is having a big enough sample size at each to make the result meaningful. In an ideal world you would have thousands of tournaments played at varying levels of multitabling, where your skill level was the same for each period. In reality this is very unlikely and so you are going to have to estimate a bit.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
20 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Habanerra

CSerpent

KJ

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12011

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1