November 18, 2014
So I’m a little bit concerned cause I’m losing money over MTTs.
When I review my stats for the last 7 months I can see I have a big cash of 900$ 8 months ago and then a regular leak of about 75$ a month.
My volume is quite low so I’m not sure what to think about it. Here’s my stats (by month) for MTTs and for STTs. Can you tell me if that is normal, variance or if I am a losing player in MTTs? Is difficult to judge because my volume is not high so I’m not sure whether this is just normal or I should stop playing and focus on STT where I’m clearly a winning player.
MTTs
STTs
Could you please give me some input on whether that is to be expected giving my volume or I’m doing something terribly wrong?
November 18, 2014
I think you are reading it wrong.
My STT all are 3.5$ or 7$, my MTT go from 1$ to 11$ (much more biased towards the 1$ range but I ocasionally play some 11$ and some 8.8$).
What you are seening is the TOTAL buying for the month. So in May (this month) I’ve played only 10$ (that’s no longer true but it was at that time). The previous month (april) my total buy in was 700$ for the whole month and I played 216 tourneys (so the average is 3.5$ tournaments) On March I buy in for a total of 833$ on 168 tourneys (so an average of 4.5$ s&Gos)
Hope that makes sense. The thing is you can clearly see I’m paying my loses on MTTs by winning the same amount on S&Go.. I’m aware I play a really low volume of MTTs but seeing the results I’m not sure if that’s just variance or I’m losing a lot.
November 18, 2014
I’m not sure I know how to interpret the “chip EV graph”. Specially since that big win at the start messes it up a little bit. In general terms my EV (by hands played) seem to show that the Expected Chips Won go up but the actual Chips Won go down, which I assume means I’m just not running as good as I may but otherwise I’m not playing bad. Does that make sense? I’m not sure I know how to interpret those.
September 30, 2013
It depends on what you want to accomplish. If you only care about making money, keep playing those STT and try to set goals to get higher up in terms of buyins.
If your goal is to become better in MTT there are multiple things you can do:
1. Review your hand history with atleast one other poker player. This is a great way to get new ideas and its way easier to spot leaks. There is a thread here on the forum with study groups on skype, get in there.
2. Where do things generally go wrong? Early, mid or late stage? Check out TPE university part on either to improve that area of your game.
3. Review Andrew Brokos hand reading videos, multiple times. Dont forget to apply when playing so keep the amount of tables down and focus some sessions on only hand reading. I good idea is to review some old tournaments where you go deep and do hand reading on every hand. This is a great way to improve a vital part in your game.
4. Playing MTT is brutal, the bigger the fields are, the more brutal the game is. MTT has very high variance and playing 90 MTT is like 3-4 sessions for a month. So keep tables down or even stakes down until results improve. And then gradually increase in stakes, and tables if you feel comfortable with it.
5. Just based on results no one can tell if this is variance or bad play. For someone to answer that they must see some history for tournaments. Some players have 6 months of loosing months in a row and they play 4-6 days a week. And this is happens to really good players.
6.
November 18, 2014
Thanks to the both of you.
No, I do not “care” only about making money (I’ve noted I kinda like it though). My usual is that I play and bust some soon and get deep on some and get really deep on some but end up busing close to the real money. With my current structure that means I’m losing money… obviosly if I do get a single final table (on the big MTTs) I end up recovering a lot.
Funny enough with all this I’ve started using more the reports section of PT4 and I’ve found some other interesting things.
For example, I’m clearly winning in small fields tournament (45 to 180 players) with ROI of 48% (obviosuly over a really small sample size) meaning I’m losing on big MTTs, probably due to variance and the fact they are brutal as you say, specially with fields of 5000 and over.
Thanks guys for the feedback. I was a little bit concerned about playing them badly as compared to S&G, specially since I come from a S&G background but given this I don’t think I’m doing that bad. I’m probably going to focus more on 45, 90 and 180 MTTs for a while to build up my background.
February 5, 2015
I don’t think you could draw any conclusions at all from a sample size of MTTs as small as that.
Variance is much greater in MTTs than STTs.
You could be a solid winner in MTT’s and go a year or two even losing…then get it all back plus a +ROI in a single day.
You can’t even compare the two samples imo.
Possibly you could draw a more useful comparison between a sample of MTTs and 180 man SNGs. But even then it wouldn’t be that helpful. I expect a solid winner in 180 sngs should be well on the way to being at least a break-even MTT’er. I am trying to make that leap myself now, although I wouldn’t even say I am a solid winner in the 180 mans. I struggle to maintain a ROI of 8%.
I am a “work in progress”!
There is in fact a theory out there that the poker-boom celebrities such as Matusow and Ivey and Hellmuth etc. are just the guys who ran the best in live poker. The theory argues that it is not possible to play enough live poker tournaments to exact one’s true ROI. These guys like Matusow are inarguably great players, but there are hundreds like them who are of equal or perhaps even greater skill, but who just didn’t run as well as the big names at the time.
Hey! I didn’t come up with the theory, but I did find it interesting.
Play 5000 Mtt’s and have another look.
February 5, 2015
February 5, 2015
seriously!
NOW its working! I replied already twice and kept getting ajax.
I play $8 and $15 180 turbos on Stars.
Also some 2.50s when I’m hurting BR wise…like now!
I am beginning to fear that some seismic shift has occurred which I am unaware of in these 180s.
At the very least one needs to be keeping up with the winning trends. Of course, the real crushers not only know these trends, they are already figuring out how to combat them. I had a great SNG coach, but he’s gone AWOL. He ran a stable of SNG players, so he was invaluable to me.
Since Christmas I have been running at a similar -ROI as when I freakin’ started out in SNGs years ago! When i used to play off my nut on a variety of substances until I literally couldn’t even see what cards I had.
Now I play 100% no drink (gave up the rest years ago), and I still am doing this badly.
I keep telling myself it is just a swing…but almost 6 months is beginning to worry me.
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
53 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1