December 28, 2012
Whilst he's been active over the 11 hands we have on him, it's 11 hands so I think we have to be a little careful with our inferences from this small sample.
I'm not convinced we can put him on a 30% calling range from the SB – this would obviously be way too loose on his part, but this assumption feels a tad crude.
We may infer that he is flatting more than he probably should.
Minus the 9 or K for a straight, I'm Cbetting with the backdoor nut flush draw and a J blocker to his QJ and JT hands (which I'd expect to form part of a typical Villain SB flatting range). Given that we think he flats too much, he'll probably fold flop too much / we can put a lot of pressure on a lot of his (too weak) range on later streets. However, I think I want to check behind here and evaluate the turn, thinking about it.
December 28, 2012
No probem re. replying! 🙂
I think we'd need more of a read to put say K5s, K9o, weaker Aces, unsuited one gappers etc. in his range with any great confidence.
Hopefully some far better players than myself will reply and help iron this out, but I'd expect to see suited broadways, pocket pairs (not that I necessary like this), the odd monster perhaps. If he's too loose as we suspect maybe we can be confident in putting in some unsuited broadways in there too.
I don't really see too much that he should be flatting with from the SB with ~22BBs, so I think he's making a big mistake if your read is anywhere near close. As I said, I think he'll therefore fold too many flops, which makes a small Cbet attractive a lot of the time, I guess. In this case I'd check back the flop IP because our Ace high may be good anyway and there are a lot of good turns for us. Given that he is shallow we can put a lot of pressure on him over the next two streets anyway if he checks to us on the turn, particularly at this stage of a major.
December 28, 2012
He's going to have a lot of pair plus draw type hands, two pair hands (I doubt he has sets, but maybe), flush draws – it's just so likely he has hit some part of that board.
I really hate bet folding our equity here, hence I check flop and evaluate turn. I guess now it's a stove question but without looking at the numbers in any detail I think it's a call.
February 20, 2013
I prefer to skip this cbet, and jam over a turn lead on many turn cards. Some small turn leads on certain cards could be flatted as well. This flop really only misses his setmines, and villain has shown himself to be very active.
As played, fold now.
11 hand sample with that much action is enough for me to justify calling with this hand if he 3b jams pre, fwiw.
30% SB flatting range seems high for even this guy- I’d guess 20-25% and would exclude the top 8% of hands since he would likely 3b.
It feels like the SB had a plan here. The BB is probably folding (he knows this better than you?) and thus he can flat with a bit pair for value. If so, he got a perfect check-shove flop for his stack size. I see KK played this way more than I would expect. I am folding here (and would fold AT here also). AQ would be a sigh and a tank, but probably a reluctant call.
TPE Pro
December 30, 2013
as i see it…
as pointed out by others, i think assuming 30% range on an 11 hand sample where he happened to play 4 pots is a bit outlandish. consider starting somewhere in the baseline 25% range and work from here, based on more solid assumptions with more history.
when considering our cbet decision:
perks of cbetting = we have double gutter, A-high, backdoor hearts. we will likely bet/bet/jam a lot of run outs and expect to win a bunch vs weaker-tighter players
minuses to cbetting = this scenario. an aggro villain will ch/j pair+jack type hands (QJ and JT comes to mind), KJ, prob Q a few Qx, and front door flush draws; shutting us out of our equity.
i like andinista's idea of jamming over some leads on the turn, perhaps even getting trickier by raising to an amount where we are def calling off. we could also call, then jam over some rivers as well, as the size of the pot would allow us enough wiggle room (assuming standardish bet sizing on villains part). anything to make his life tough out of position here.
one other thing about not cbetting that i think we are all missing—nothing really terri-bad happens to us by checking. if stabbing the flop is going to work here, its probably going to work on the turn if/when checked to again. additionally, we'll have a free shot at drawing to 8 straight outs, plus potentially 3 A outs, and 7/45 heart combos for backdoor flush on the turn (two of which are included in our straight outs). a little less than half the time (if my combinatorics arent that rusty, and my Ace out assumption is valid), we will pick up something on the turn. for this reason especially, i prefer checking back flop against opponents we perceive to be loose-aggressive (something you heavily implied in your post), because it would be a pretty big sin to get ch/r off our hand.
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
21 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1