TPE Pro
August 25, 2012
I think the first hand is absolutely fine – it’s not a bad play to raise the turn on that board when it becomes more dynamic, since there are some river cards which could cost you action (4, 6, A, diamond), and yes, you do get a ton of value from villain’s overpairs.
Just because he’s aggressive you can’t assume that he a) literally can’t ever have a strong hand, and b) he’s always going to bluff the river. It’s much more important to get all of villain’s chips every time he has 55, 33, 22 or JJ+ than it is to get one extra bet on the occasions he has KQ or some other random hand.
Don’t beat yourself up just because he folded. Just take it as an opportunity to recognise that if you really think that raise was so bad because he’s folding so much to it, then next time you can float flop/raise turn as a bluff and profit! Nice hand sir, villain had nothing and couldn’t pay us off this time, no big deal.
Second hand, though…second hand is a bit of a disaster. Why did you decide to make it 2100 when villain is almost guaranteed to call? You mention it looking strong, but what’s the goal here? Get him to fold 99? Get value from 77? Not really sure. It seems much more logical to simply call the 300 with your entire range and then play the flop as if you had raised to 900 and he had called – either that, or make a 4-bet big enough that he’s almost guaranteed to fold his entire range (~3k), or you could even just jam preflop if you think he never flats that spot with a hand that can call it off.
On the flop, J9x is one of the best flops for his flatting preflop range, and 88 is one of the worst bluff hands to use on that flop since you only have two outs to improve to middle set. Your flop bet is also quite big (~2200 would probably accomplish the same thing). Then, when he shoves, let’s imagine that the worst hand in his range is QT or KQ – each of those hands have 10-12 outs against your hand, which means best case scenario you have about 60-65% equity, compared to the worst case scenario of you having about 10% equity or less when you only have two outs.
The real problem with making ‘hero-calls’ on the flop in all-in situations is that your opponent gets to realise their full equity and see both the turn and the river, meaning that if you are ahead, you’re not likely to be very far ahead. In this spot, villain is shoving into your range for 4-betting and betting big on a flop that hits his range – the reason he tanked before shoving was likely because he wasn’t sure he actually ever gets called by worse. Your range includes a lot of QQ+ in that spot and I imagine he was extremely surprised to see 88.
I know people like to talk about patience, but I don’t actually think that’s the issue. I think in most cases, people are impatient because they desire greater control over their results – they think they can just play a hand right now and make more chips, so why would they wait? In this scenario, I think your call was less dictated by patience and more dictated by a desire to overcome the reality that this was simply not a favourable board for your hand and not a favourable spot to call it off, and those are things you don’t control. A lot of spots in poker are not favourable, and that’s okay.
You might have been thinking, “well, this isn’t a great spot, but if I can pick off a bluff here then I might win a big pot 55% of the time”, when in reality the more appropriate thought process might have been, “well, there are a lot of times when this 4-bet pot is going to be a good spot for me against a player like this, but third pair with two outs on a bad board isn’t one of them”.
I recognise there’s very little difference between patience and accepting a lack of control, and that in this case they’re kind of the same. But I think a ton of mistakes in poker come from trying to control the uncontrollable or force a hand in a direction it just won’t go, and this was one of them.
First hand was great though, so one out of two ain’t bad at all. 🙂
February 5, 2015
Hey Joel…sorry to hear you had a bad experience…I actually took a pen and paper out as I was playing the other night to write down your hands to see what I thought about it…but I got carried away under my own avalanche of disaster…
Then I thought… Id probably only tell you to do the wrong thing anyway! So it’s no great loss…
But I did read your post and wanted to comment.
It is my daughter’s 8th birthday tonight so I will only do the first hand.
Edit: I just deleted the post i wrote about your first hand, because I got it all wrong lol! I mis-read the order of events.
So just instead take this post as acknowledgement that I was thinking about you at least!
Anyway…cake time!
Hey Joel! Good post. I agree with Matt, I like the first hand. The second hand, not as much. Basically ditto to what Matt said. One thing that has helped me a lot is always thinking of what the villain’s range is. Every time after he does an action, I ask myself the question, “What does this say about his range?” So on the flop of J 9 x, those middling cards there pretty much smack a villain’s button calling range.
December 30, 2015
Matt already said it all very well but just to add to the point. I think your line on the first hand was great! Reasons to raise the turn:
1. V is showing interest.
2. We are likely still very much ahead.
3. If V is on a draw, he may call whereas on the river he may just give up. If we just call it is in hopes of a river bluff which is not guaranteed at all.
4. If V is not on a draw there are scare cards on the river that could shut down action.
5. If V is strong with an over-pair, 2-pair or under-set, there are scare cards on the river that could shut down action.
6. Protection. I see this used as a dirty word, but it has it’s place and the turn brings several draws. Why let V set the price? Charge’m.
Top-set on a dry board is probably only maxing-out at 2 streets of value a lot of the time, and often not the first two. In this case, you already got 2 streets buy the turn. The check-raise would have made 3, which is awesome. You gave yourself a chance for 3+ streets of value. Plus, if V had JJ+ you gave V an opportunity to spaz out on a wet board to protect his own hand.
There is a place to call and keep in bluffs and worse cards, but I don’t think this was one of them.
Hand #2 is an interesting shove spot. V clearly made a mistaken raise. Shoving could work 2 ways. 1) We win the hand risk-free with a hand that doesn’t flop well (unless we hit a set). 2) Less likely, but it looks like we are taking advantage of a super obvious mistake and we could get looked-up by worse. I was actually in V’s shoes recently and dropped an extra chip in to call by accident (I almost always verbalize my action too, so this was extra frustrating and embarrassing). It folded back around to the big stack who opened and V just shoved and there was nothing I could do about it. I doubt he had JJ+ since it was super obvious I didn’t intend to raise in the first place, severely capping my range, but I’m not risking my tournament life on a hand that I wasn’t even going to raise with. Someone could do this as an angle, but it isn’t above-board and the floorman may get involved and kill the hand. It would be pretty obvious too if the guy “accidentally raised”, called, and then flopped over AA. I’m not sure how all card rooms handle this, and it probably depends on how much is on the line, but it would never be less than a warning, would it? If it is for someone’s tourney life it may be a stack reset and time-out-penalty the first time and disqualify the second?
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
23 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Philbro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12007
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1