A A A

Home Forum MTT Poker Strategy K9 vs suddenly X/R on river

Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes)

K9 vs suddenly X/R on river

rutramax

Playing Freerolls

Members

Forum Posts: 12

Member Since:
February 22, 2014

Offline

March 14, 2014 - 10:26 am

Poker Stars $7.34+$0.66 No Limit Hold'em Tournament – t10/t20 Blinds – 9 players – View hand 2453259
TournamentPokerEdge.com Hand History Converter

MP1: t1480 74 BBs
MP2: t1480 74 BBs
CO: t1410 70.50 BBs
BTN: t1070 53.50 BBs
SB: t1520 76 BBs
Hero (BB): t1500 75 BBs
UTG: t1500 75 BBs
UTG+1: t2180 109 BBs
UTG+2: t1360 68 BBs

Pre Flop: (t30) Hero is BB with K of clubs 9 of diamonds
2 folds, UTG+2 calls t20, MP1 calls t20, 2 folds, BTN calls t20, 1 fold, Hero checks

Flop: (t90) 4 of diamonds 9 of spades 6 (4 players)
Hero bets t60, UTG+2 calls t60, MP1 folds, BTN folds

Turn: (t210) 6 of clubs (2 players)
Hero checks, UTG+2 checks

River: (t210) K of diamonds (2 players)
Hero bets t160, UTG+2 raises to t660, Hero calls t500

Hey guys check out this hand..

Most of the times i lead on flops like these because i`m ahead of their limping range mostly and leading on this flop tells me more info about where i am in the hand. I can extract values from low/medium pairs, some A4, A6, 57, 78 broadways, etc.

When he calls the flop it doesnt tells me much because all the range that i`m still putting him on. I check to control the size of the pot and see what he does. (OOP i think is best to take a cautious way with marginal holdings inspite the fact that on this board it doesnt represent that much on his range).

He checks the turn. I think this takes him out of trips, full houses because he should be betting those to make a pot. I`m basically putting him on broadways, A4, straight draws, low/mid pairs.

The K on the river is good for me to extract some value because hits some of his broadway range and he should be paying for those 60-70% of the pot. Then he suddenly x/raise, hahaha. I really thought this was a K (KQ, KJ, KT, unlikely K4s) and because the board was so dry he wanted to make the pot bigger.

Anyway, i guess i should had followed Andrew Brokos assumption of when ppl play passive-passive-aggressive generally means a monster but i don`t wanna be results oriented, hehe.

When i calls he shows me…. SURPRISE SURPRISE….. 46s for a full house!

What you guys thinks about the play?

Thanks for attention and replies

CCuster 911

Delaware

TPE Pro

Forum Posts: 187

Member Since:
September 28, 2012

Offline

March 14, 2014 - 5:39 pm

I like your flop lead. Not a fan at all of turn check. He could have so many draws, that we shouldnt be all that concered with pot control. Especially on boards liek this here we dont expect him to bluff over top of us on turn often.

Once the river comes and he raises, I cant see all that many hands we are ahead of.

Its wierd because of his turn check. It seems like he is drawing or weak and is pot controlling IP, but then raises an effective blank(for his range) on the river. So he is signalling that he has a good hand or missed draw, but the type of people that bluff missed draws here with a raise are also the type that bet turn checked too with a draw. So I would side with a monster.

Its also not a huge pot where bluffing has huge returns. He has 80 chips invested, so it doesnt seem like a spot where we expect him to bluff a lot.

For Coaching - ccuster911@gmail.com - HH Reviews/Leak Finder(HEM or PT)/Concept Discussion

rutramax

Playing Freerolls

Members

Forum Posts: 12

Member Since:
February 22, 2014

Offline

March 14, 2014 - 9:25 pm