September 14, 2014
#Game No : 643457010
***** 888poker Hand History for Game 643457010 *****
$600/$1,200 Blinds No Limit Holdem – ***
Tournament #63530731 $2.70 + $0.30 – Table #16 9 Max (Real Money)
Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: LoneWolffff ( $31,428 )
Seat 2: TagiiL ( $8,586 )
Seat 3: RockLiemansk ( $16,920 )
Seat 4: JohannesAK ( $13,472 )
Seat 5: london_ace ( $40,456 )
Seat 6: dymek470 ( $10,594 )
Seat 7: toeff33 ( $46,877 )
Seat 9: marialves59 ( $35,815 )
Seat 10: jonkordic27 ( $25,514 )
RockLiemansk posts ante [$120]
marialves59 posts ante [$120]
dymek470 posts ante [$120]
JohannesAK posts ante [$120]
toeff33 posts ante [$120]
TagiiL posts ante [$120]
jonkordic27 posts ante [$120]
LoneWolffff posts ante [$120]
london_ace posts ante [$120]
JohannesAK posts small blind [$600]
london_ace posts big blind [$1,200]
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to london_ace [ J, T ]
dymek470 folds
toeff33 folds
marialves59 raises [$2,400]
jonkordic27 folds
LoneWolffff folds
TagiiL folds
RockLiemansk folds
JohannesAK folds
london_ace calls [$1,200]
** Dealing flop ** [ 8, 9, 4 ]
london_ace checks
marialves59 bets [$3,240]
london_ace calls [$3,240]
** Dealing turn ** [ 3 ]
london_ace checks
marialves59 checks
** Dealing river ** [ K ]
london_ace checks
marialves59 checks
Heeeey.
Not much reads on v , they've not been active from what i've seen.
I was debating to myself as whether i should c/r here or just c/c. h Which line do you take and why?
the answer is prolly “it depends”
depends on your opponent , reads help , but we've not got much reads here. Against a looser opponent that opens up often i think c/r is pretty good here because they'll be folding a bunch to our semi bluff. Against a tighter opponent i think c/c is better as theiir range will be tighter and it's unlikely we're gunna get a fold unless we triple barrell bluff (assuming we don't hit)
TPE Pro
December 6, 2012
Start by thinking about how wide your value range would be, because that determines your bluffing range. There aren't many hands you could check-raise for value here against an EP raiser, and probably I'd just check-call my whole range. I would bluff the river, though. You've got J-high so even a smallish bluff designed to fold out AQ/AJ should be better than checking.
September 14, 2014
cheers Andrew , i must say i don't do that often , i dont tend to think how wide my value range would be when i call the flop so basically what you're saying is what is the top/medium/bottom of my c/c range yeh?,
the reason why i never bluffed river is because i put them on overpairs like TT-AA since its an ep raise and all.., I never did like the K on the river , if they've got any k they are likely to call as well.
I'm curious as to why u think bluffing river is good? we don't have showdown value thats for sure but what are we repping…K9s? a flush that got their on the river? i guess their is a few hands that we can rep come to think of it. I also think that their range seems weighted more towards marginal hands , i think most overpairs will bet turn on this draw yheav board , so yeah i should had discounted that from their range.
TPE Pro
December 6, 2012
folding_aces_pre_yo said:
cheers Andrew , i must say i don't do that often , i dont tend to think how wide my value range would be when i call the flop so basically what you're saying is what is the top/medium/bottom of my c/c range yeh?,
the reason why i never bluffed river is because i put them on overpairs like TT-AA since its an ep raise and all.., I never did like the K on the river , if they've got any k they are likely to call as well.
I'm curious as to why u think bluffing river is good? we don't have showdown value thats for sure but what are we repping…K9s? a flush that got their on the river? i guess their is a few hands that we can rep come to think of it. I also think that their range seems weighted more towards marginal hands , i think most overpairs will bet turn on this draw yheav board , so yeah i should had discounted that from their range.
It's easier to be dealt AQ/AJ (28 combos, given your blocker) than TT+ (26 combos). Even if V plays both this way, he has to look you up REALLY often to make a 1/3 pot bet more profitable than checking when you have practically 0 showdown value. Have you seen my bluffing series? The right question to ask is usually “how wide should my bluffing range be” rather than “is this a good spot to bluff”?
Also why do you think you need a hand as strong as two-pair to value bet the river after V checks back turn?
September 14, 2014
Foucault said:
I'm curious as to why u think bluffing river is good? we don't have showdown value thats for sure but what are we repping…K9s? a flush that got their on the river? i guess their is a few hands that we can rep come to think of it. I also think that their range seems weighted more towards marginal hands , i think most overpairs will bet turn on this draw yheav board , so yeah i should had discounted that from their range.
It's easier to be dealt AQ/AJ (28 combos, given your blocker) than TT+ (26 combos). Even if V plays both this way, he has to look you up REALLY often to make a 1/3 pot bet more profitable than checking when you have practically 0 showdown value. Have you seen my bluffing series? The right question to ask is usually “how wide should my bluffing range be” rather than “is this a good spot to bluff”?
Also why do you think you need a hand as strong as two-pair to value bet the river after V checks back turn?
I've not watched the bluffing series , I will have to, because it seems im struggling in this area.
I never did say we need a strong hand as two-pair to value bet river. I was saying what are we repping when we take a stab on the river.
I actually think bluffing the Kd river is good , when v checks back turn it's unlikely they've got a hand with a diamond init (draw) , like AhQd for instance , most diamonds would be bet on the turn. So i think my bluffing range should be wide on the river. I also think any card that completes a straight is a good card to bluff on a jack or ten for instance. Although we've now got showdown value (a pair) i would turn my hand into a bluff here.
not sure if you would agree with this , but that's what i'd do.
TPE Pro
December 6, 2012
I guess I'm disagreeing that a river bet would rep K9 or a flush as opposed to T9 or something like that. I certainly wouldn't expect Villain to fold any hand that beats T9 but not K9. I also don't think it matters that much that V isn't likely to have diamonds, though I agree that he isn't. The only thing that really matters here is that he's going to have no pair at all pretty often, and you can't even beat that. I don't think turning a pair into a bluff would be a good idea for that reason. If you're betting a T river, it's for value.
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
44 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1