This hand sucks because  I think you played it fine and just have to fold river.  He's barreling into 3 people on the flop after raising UTG and proceeds to bet all three streets with blinds at 10/20.  It's a monster almost every time here.  If he is bluffing in this spot you have to give him credit for doing so, because it just shouldn't happen at this point in the tournament.

Do we really think his range is 33+? 

Also, I think on board texture on turn villian should be almost always checking hands he has showdown value with on river, fwiw.  The turn board could essentially be our river decision.

In terms of pocket range, I do think its 33+

Thats is, if we do account that the UTG+1 player raising 5xBB in the first level of a 10$ tourney wont have 33 with the same frequency as QQ. There's also a need to adjust for the cards on board that reduces the number of possible combinaisons. In the equity calculation from the previous post, I only counted two combinations of the pairs 33-99 compared to 6 for the 1010-AA (1 for Jacks)

Could you explain why you wouldn't include small and medium pairs ?

Or maybe you meant that the range assign was too much pairs and not enough of other sorts of hands ?

Also, from the villain perspective, If we call the turn, our range is pretty much define to middle pockets (88,99,1010,JJ,QQ), 78s or a flush draw. If a non-flush card hit the river, he might very well value bet AA-KK-QQ against our range or even bluff a missed draw he had, putting us in another tough decision. So I dont think that the reverse implied odds are absent here and that he's gonna check most of his turn range on the river. 

But, I mean, I usually play it just like mistergj did, but I also hate to spend so much chips in that spot, and thinking maybe the turn fold would be the best option.