View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
ITM & ROI Stats
Donskey
Guest
Guests
1
August 24, 2011 - 12:24 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Hi Pros

 

Reading and listening to online pros, many have said that a high ITM (20+) statistic is not really a great stat meaning you are probably playing to tight.

 

They all say the more important stat is obviously the ROI.

 

Is there a general (mean) preferred statistic for these two stats? ie?

 

What is a good consistent ROI over the long run? and

What is a good consistent ITM stat over the long run?

 

thx

Donskey

rlamanna
Guest
Guests
2
August 24, 2011 - 9:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

EDIT: sorry, I’m no pro! But I figured you can find my opinion useful.

While I can’t give a number for either, ITM% is largely unimportant due to to payout structures used in MTT. Take $4 180 man payouts from PS for example. If you played 50 of the SNGs and min-cashed every other 180 man you played, which is a largely impossible feat, you have a 50% ITM. However, after these 50, you have lost to the rake and are now down $8, a little less than 2 buyins. If, on the other hand, you played 33 of the same $4 180s, and you only cashed in one but you shipped it, you have a 3% in the money and have a profit of $36.8. ITM percentage for normal structured tournaments, meaning not including satellites, is largely insignificant just because the payouts of these tournaments are so top heavy. Like my example, it is more profitable to win 1 in every 33 180 mans than to simply min-cash in 1 in every 2 180 man’s, even though the 50% ITM looks like a sexy statistic to have.

In looking at many profitable MTT players on OPR however, I see a consistent number in the range of 15%-20% ITM. Just remember, making those FTs is far more important than cashing! Your best friend in results statistics, I think, is your FT%. ROI can be skewed by a single run hot for a huge score (example, Jamie Gold), and A 50% ITM player can still retain a negative ROI. Also, the best statistic you can boast of, of anything else, is VOLUME. Volume gives meaning to all of these statistics, and without volume your numbers have no true value.

Avatar
RonFezBuddy
New York City

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 2313
Member Since:
March 17, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 24, 2011 - 11:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

The above is a very good post. ITM 15-20% is generally fine. ROI is what is important and is also affected by what you play and what volume. These days ROIs in the 10%-20% are perfectly fine and really anything positive is good. If you see a guy with thousands of tourneys and a 15% ROI he’s probably good.

ttwist

TPE Pro

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 1230
Member Since:
July 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
August 24, 2011 - 5:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

RonFezBuddy said:

The above is a very good post. ITM 15-20% is generally fine. ROI is what is important and is also affected by what you play and what volume. These days ROIs in the 10%-20% are perfectly fine and really anything positive is good. If you see a guy with thousands of tourneys and a 15% ROI he's probably good.

+1

Donskey
Guest
Guests
5
August 24, 2011 - 8:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thx for the replies

 

Maybe I wasn't clear enough with my question.

 

There is a mountain of stats of all the winning players. More than enough of a sample size to work out an average (mean or expected) stat for ITM and ROI.

 

I just thought maybe someone has done this with a program or know of a website that has put all the stats of the winning players over the last 10 years or so

or how ever long online poker has been running.

 

Looking at one individual or a small sample size doesn't tell us much. There will always be players playing 1 to 2 deviations to the left of expectation (running bad) and

players playing 1 to 2 deviations to the right of expectation (running good), but there will be a “mean” of where you should be and where in the long run you will be (hopefully if

you're a winning player) and where the majority of players would be. (Bell Curve)

 

Huge scores of individual players will not affect the mean, it will in a small sample size but not a huge one, it will be absorbed in the stats and form part of the final

averages.

 

Anyway , thought it would be interesting stats to know if they were out there somewhere, but if they are not then they are not.

rlamanna
Guest
Guests
6
August 24, 2011 - 8:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Appreciate the props to my post, ronfez and twist! Not to toot my own horn, but I do know my stuff! I just have to apply it to my game, much harder than it seems lol. Definitely plan on helping to up the quality of posts here, love to share my knowledge.

EDIT: in reply to above, I have not seen a compilation of such statistics. However, the 15-20% ITM is a range I have found to hold true by looking through many profitable players. And, through proper volume, I would think any ROI around 20% is a very good number. I don’t think over 30% is realistically attainable over a large sample. (I have it! But not nearly enough of a sample size)

cousteer
Guest
Guests
7
August 25, 2011 - 1:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Just a note… although i haven't attempted to correct for it… if you play KO tourneys and successfully knock a few punters out for cash then PT3 counts them as an ITM stat.  Only came across it when I failed to cash in a heap of KO tourneys at the start of the month, but still managed to register a 50% ITM stat.

bennymacca
Adelaide Australia
Road Gambling with Doyle
Members
Forum Posts: 2616
Member Since:
October 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
August 25, 2011 - 3:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

itm doesnt really matter much at all imo – it also depends on field sizes in the MTTs, as well as payout structure. 

 

just worry about your ROI and if that is significantly positive, i wouldn't care about any of the other stats like that. 

 

 

Cougars4444
Guest
Guests
9
August 26, 2011 - 9:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I'd agree ROI is by far the most important statistic to pay attention to.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
22 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12008

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1