View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
Is this a shove or a fold? FT 6 left
throwedab
Guest
Guests
1
November 12, 2012 - 9:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Hand#3144C233C8000132 – $3,000 GTD Turbo R&A T1

2727240 — TICKETCASH — $5 + $0.5 — 9 Max — Table 16 — 5000/25000/50000 NL Hold'em — 2012/11/12 – 18:43:40
Dealer: Seat 1
Seat 1: Trattoria420 (731,340 in chips)
Seat 4: cshepard1137 (473,580 in chips)
Seat 7: raiserhead (339,946 in chips)
Seat 8: bostttt (368,974 in chips)
Seat 9: thedankage1 (383,002 in chips)
Seat 10: duffus321 (551,658 in chips)
Trattoria420: posts ante of 5,000
cshepard1137: posts ante of 5,000
raiserhead: posts ante of 5,000
bostttt: posts ante of 5,000
thedankage1: posts ante of 5,000
duffus321: posts ante of 5,000
cshepard1137: posts small blind 25,000
raiserhead: posts big blind 50,000
Dealt to bostttt [Qd,Ts]
bostttt: is all in 363,974
thedankage1: folds
duffus321: is all in 546,658
Trattoria420: folds
cshepard1137: folds
raiserhead: folds
duffus321: returns uncalled bet 182,684

Avatar
Killingbird
Cary, NC

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 4582
Member Since:
April 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
November 13, 2012 - 1:19 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Pretty close IMO and depends a bit of course on what the table has been playing like.  I dont hate a shove.  suited i think i for sure shove, so it really cant be that bad.

 

I'd plug it in to nash and see what it looks like.

duggs
nz
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 591
Member Since:
May 30, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
November 13, 2012 - 3:18 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

im unsure also, nash it and post please

badabing78
Hitting The Circuit
Forum Posts: 639
Member Since:
October 22, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
November 13, 2012 - 9:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

on the first sight i would have said its a close shove, but nash says:

22+ A2s+ A7o+ A5o K7s+ KTo+ Q9s+ QJo J8s+ T8s+ 98s 87s

packallama
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 176
Member Since:
August 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
November 13, 2012 - 10:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Did you include the exact playjumps of the ft when you entered it into nash? It is probably a +cEV shove, but I wonder how much payjumps change our shoving range.

Chuck Blaze
Small Stakes Grinder
Members
Forum Posts: 77
Member Since:
August 21, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
November 13, 2012 - 10:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Yah that spot is pretty close. It’s a turbo and you are lookin to get in soon but I thInk I could find a fold button given the other equal stacks at the table. This more comes down to table dynamics and how the final table has been playing. If I’m having trouble finding a good spot I make take this but I think you can still wait for a spot in the next few hands that is a bit better. I’m shoving a lot wider in late position here.

Welcome to TPE bosttt. We play a lot together on lock. I’d love to talk poker anytime ht me up bro.

throwedab
Guest
Guests
7
November 13, 2012 - 2:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

To include more information, the table was playing pretty much fit or fold, I had also gone into the FT 2nd in chips and did not play a single hand until we got 6 handed, I remember by that point I was 6/6 in chips, I had also shoved the hand right before the one posted from UTG+1 with J10o on 268,969 (5.3 BBs) as soon as we got 6 handed, I kind of felt in a way my shove would look stronger considering I had just shoved the hand before and I don't expect the other players to think im shoving light twice in a row and from UTG.

 

I also ran it in the Nash Calculator but I didn't change the “Structure” so I would assume payjump differences are not calculated in this range.

 

UTG 368974 21.9% 13.69% 14.00% +0.314%

 

According to Nash, I should be shoving 21.9 % of my range here according to a (0.5, 0.3, 0.2) structure

 

That would include A8o-A3s – K10o-K7s – Q10o-Q9s – J10o-J9s, 109s and 66-AA.

 

Looking at the hand now, I definitely could have folded and possibly moved up a couple payjumps but I also believe the blinds were about to go up to 30k/60k/6kante and that may have played into my decision but for the most part, I felt like I would rather shove Q10o 6 handed instead of folding and letting the blinds go through me and losing 85k through the blinds if they dont go up during that time and considering I don't get a hand in the blinds obviously.

 

I would love to know if my Nash calculations are correct and also if someone could assist in putting it into Nash again with appropriate payjumps to see how it changes shoving ranges.

throwedab
Guest
Guests
8
November 13, 2012 - 2:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Hey whats up Chuck, I've definitely seen you at my tables before.

 

Hit me up on skype if you have it, would love to talk hands or just poker in general.

 

Alexander.bost on skype

 

See you on the tables, glgl!

jjpregler
Grinding Micros
Members
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
September 29, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
November 13, 2012 - 3:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Kill Everyone shove tables list this as a close fold.  However, they do list as a caveat, that it is close fold if players are playing an equilibrium strategy, which most players do not.  Most player call tighter than the equilibrium solution and therefore, the shoving ranges can be loosened due to the increased FE you get from other players. 

Either way, this seems to be a close spot either way, so either option is probably reasonable.  However, if the play is too nitty, shoving becomes more correct.

Avatar
StrangeFame
Toronto
Grinding Micros
Members
Forum Posts: 53
Member Since:
July 11, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
November 13, 2012 - 10:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Fold

QTs is fine here. Personally, I'd prefer jaming ATC from SB/LP > Qx from EP.
Put 5-7hrs into working with a nash calculator and tinker with the stack sizes/blinds/payouts. This will help you get a feel for these spots.

throwedab
Guest
Guests
11
November 13, 2012 - 11:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thanks for all the feedback everyone

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
32 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12008

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1