January 1, 2017
Buy-in: $2.30+$2.30+$0.40 USD Hold’em No Limit
PokerStars
7 players
Formatted by pokercopilot.com: Poker HUD for Mac and Windows
Stacks:
UTG – UTG (
UTG+1 – UTG+1 (T1,452)
MP – Hero (T1,452)
CO – CO (T1,392)
BTN – BTN (T1,452)
SB – SB (T1,576)
BB – BB (T2,004)
Preflop: (
T51, 7 players) Hero is MP with 9♥ 9♣UTG calls T20, 1 fold, Hero raises to T66, 3 folds, BB calls T46, UTG calls T46
Flop:
8♣ K♠ K♥ (T229, 3 players – BB: T1,935, UTG: T2,606, Hero: T1,383)BB checks, UTG checks, Hero bets T177, 1 fold, UTG calls T177
Turn:
5♣ (T583, 2 players – UTG: T2,429, Hero: T1,206)UTG checks, Hero bets T442, UTG raises to T884, Hero ???
July 7, 2012
is this a bounty SNG? not that it really matters too much but would be nice to know for sure.
Anyway, given that you all have 1500ish chips I assume its an SNG. Without going into deep details about this specific hand I will give a more general answer about playing middling pocket pairs in the early levels of a SNG. Treat them like small pocket pairs, you are pretty much set mining with them but have more showdown value so try to get to rivers as cheap as possible. Basically, in the early levels 66-TT will cost you big and win you little unless you hit a set. These hands are significantly more valuable in the later stages though and you can happily get them in pre in many situations.
In the hand above I would have probably limped behind and played with caution post. In general in SNG early stages you want to be conserving your stack as much as possible unless you are certain you have the best hand. As played, I would check back turn and hope for a cheap showdown on the river.
aka Prophead340 aka Prophead2000 aka Turbulence_1
PocketFives Profile: .....urbulence/
January 1, 2017
Yes sorry, progressive KO SNG. Much looser than standard SNG. My plan pf was to iso the early limp, but I hear you – conserve conserve conserve.
Agreed the turn needs to be checked. Assuming a blank on the river, are you ever calling a 3/4-1 pot size bet from villain, assuming my range. 99s at that point are basically bluff catchers, correct?
May 1, 2016
Yes, 99 is basically a bluff catcher if he bets river.
Preflop I think is fine, I think I would prefer a bigger raise to iso more effectively or a limp behind a little more than a raise to 66, but it’s not a disaster.
OTF I think that the bet is perfect, as it will entice calls from some hands you have crushed (lower pps) and get hands with significant equity out (QJ, A high).
OTT a check has to be mandatory, for this exact reason. You really want to see the river after you were called on a KKx flop. You might get a lower pair to bet thinking it’s for value. And, if you DO bet, you HAVE to easily fold to a raise. No hands worse than yours are raising for value, a backdoor flush draw that picked up equity OTT seems unlikely to check raise here. What bluffs do you think he is calling the flop and ck/raising the turn with? What value hands?
So, as played, I think it’s a clear fold.
January 1, 2017
Yes, agreed. He’s betting Kx or a full house for value, or at very least a FD, which is far more likely to improve on the river than our 99s, and even if it doesn’t hit and he pushes, is there any way I can call that? Absent any other reads of loose wild play, the fold looks right in retrospect. Thanks!
TPE Pro
August 25, 2012
Min-check-raises like this are very often extremely nutted. I think folding is reasonable here, especially since you bet quite large on both flop and turn – your range looks quite strong, but villain clearly isn’t too afraid of it. Villain has trips or better almost always here.
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
50 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Philbro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12007
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1