July 7, 2012
Just checking i read that correct, you are in SB with less than one big blind? I cant imagine that folding AJo with less than one blind would ever be recomended by any form of calculation especially as you alrady have chips in the pot.
aka Prophead340 aka Prophead2000 aka Turbulence_1
PocketFives Profile: .....urbulence/
May 20, 2015
This is quite an interesting spot and one where in game I’d likely flick it in superwide. I ran a calc and you should actually be calling much narrower (around 17.2%) than I would have instinctively thought given the range you’ve assigned villain. Whilst your AJo is a call I was surprised to see you should be folding A9o A7s and 22-44. Also in equilibrium villain should actually be shoving lighter than the range you assigned him, shoving this range ATo+, A9s+ KJs+ 66+. Although I think in game we likely see a wider range than you’ve assigned him, I think it’s unlikely he’ll be able to throw any Ax, QJo+, JTs+ into the muck especially as he’s BB in the next hand and will have to commit 1/2 his stack.
July 7, 2012
astro247 said
Thanks Turbulence,Yes you did read that correctly, I just thought that maybe with a potential 67% increase in $ because of the next short-stack being all-in that it possibly be could “correct” in some circumstances to fold (e.g 73o). As I’m not too familiar with how ICM calcs might work, I thought it was worth asking if/where any cut-off line where it was correct might be?
Appreciate your response :-).
I understand where you are coming from and it is a good question to ask in general. I am learning and experimenting with Holdem Resources Manager at the moment so I will try to plug it in for you out of curiosity and have a play with it.
I this scenario if you fold you are hoping the BB will call and win, but this is far from certain as he is risking 50% of his stack whilst you are so short. As the shorty here (and we are talking exceptionally short), and having made it into the money it is your duty to gamble in this spot and triple up. If the stack sizes were deeper and you had say 11 or 12 bbs then you might be able to pass the spot.
aka Prophead340 aka Prophead2000 aka Turbulence_1
PocketFives Profile: .....urbulence/
July 7, 2012
ok, I put the numbers you provided into HRM and the simple answer get it in with any 2 cards. AJo is showing as +1.85 which is massive.
Just out of interest I increased all stack sizes by a factor of 10 thereby giving you ~9bbs. It still comes back as calling it off with AJo as being a v profitable play at +0.38.
Hope this helps.
aka Prophead340 aka Prophead2000 aka Turbulence_1
PocketFives Profile: .....urbulence/
July 7, 2012
astro247 said
Turbulence – Appreciate you doing the HRM numbers too. Though am wondering whether it considered the prizemoney like ICM does, otherwise it seems like 2 very different answers.
Results coming in next post…
I put the prize money in the calculation and did an ICM calc not chip EV, HRM can do both and a lot more. Its possible I got something wrong as I am in the early days of using HRM but i went over it several times. I only only used the basic hand function as given the stack sizes there is nothing to consider other than Push / Fold / Call.
anyway, well played and nice result!
aka Prophead340 aka Prophead2000 aka Turbulence_1
PocketFives Profile: .....urbulence/
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
75 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Philbro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12007
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1