Hello Nation. Happy New Year!
What is your thoughts about deals heads up as a variance reducer / increasing your winning instead of finish in 2nd?
Even if you do belive you have an edge, are the chipleader (almost even in stacks, 50bbs deep, non turbo) is a deal good or bad?
Are we giving up too much of our edge by accepting a deal? Also, heads up, anything can happen.
I just had a deal, did ask for slightly more than ICM as well and got it.
After the deal was made I have split feelings about it and that is why I make this post.
Cheers /Mike
April 26, 2013
Hi Mike,
I’ve had plenty of HU deals in 2015. So here are my thoughts on the topic:
I always tend to lean towards dealing to reduce variance, especially when:
– I feel (or even better: I know) due to poker ratings / solid stats I accumulated etc. that villain is capable/experienced in tournament HU play and a winning player in tournament poker over a large sample
– I am tired / looking forward to end the session because it’s been a long grind and/or it is late at night
– the moneybump from 2nd to 1st is significant to my BR (~10% or more)
– the structure of the tournament is shallow / blinds are low (less than 35 BB or less than M ~14) so variance is highly reduced
Since I often find one or more of these points to be valid, I am often leaning towards dealing. I never give in getting less than the correct chop amount and strictly cancel dealing if villain requests it. Only exception I’d make to this rule would be if the amount of money is extremly significant to my BR or villain is obviously much better than myself.
However when I feel I have a significant edge and feel still sharp and motivated I either try to get quite a bit more than correct chop numbers or I just play.
This strategy worked out perfectly for me last year. In 2014 I had a lot of trouble with my BR, struggling with variance. On the other hand in 2015 I managed to finish top 10 in the stars.fr yearly LB and I am also ranked top10 in my home-country. I am pretty certain this was only possible because I had put in a lot of effort in different areas to reduce one of the tournament-player’s most feared creature: variance.
Thank you Sen for your very long and nice post.
I really have nothing more to add than you have very nice points in your answer.
So the basic answer might be, it depends on the situation.
I will take all this with me and might make more deals in the future and put my ego and “play to win” mentality aside. We are here to make money and if dealing can make you more money in the long run that might be the way to go.
Very nice done to manage top 10 on .fr LB as well! gz!
Would love to hear some more input from more people 🙂
TPE Pro
December 6, 2012
As others have said, depends on exactly how much you’re giving up (how good are you at HU? how good do you expect V to be?) and how significant the pay jump is to you. Ideally you wouldn’t be playing tournaments where a pay jump, even the one from 1st ot 2nd, is so large that it makes sense for you to give up a significant edge to reduce your variance.
The “it’s HU, anything can happen” mentality is not helpful. Anything can happen at any stage of the tournament. That doesn’t mean that big edges don’t exist, or that the player with the edge isn’t giving something up by making a deal.
Thank you Andrew.
This was a $13.50 KO tournament ($2.5 for each KO but that is irrelevant to the deal question)
I don’t think I am a great heads up player in any way, but I felt I was a better player in general than the one I ended heads up with. It’s just a general read I did have at the table, but had no real evidence such as Sharkscope or Tournament Shark to back it up with as he wasn’t OPT-in.
This was a stars tournament and there a first place in many cases can be significant to the buy in, just not huge in this case. Not that I complain about a ~100 times to the buy-in, in payouts.
Let’s add some math. (There is probably some fancy equation you can use for all this, but I’m getting older and forgot everything I did learn in school so I just put it in here as structured as I can)
$1,688.78 (1689) for 1st
$1,219.40 (1219) for 2nd
$1,499 offered for me (asked for more than ICM) and $1409 offered for my opponent. (1499-1409=90)
The total pricepool for 1st and 2nd was $2908 (1689+1219), the difference between 1st and 2nd was 1689-1219 = 470
It means that $470 (the difference between 1st and 2nd) = 16,16% (470/2908) of the total price money left to play for.
So with the difference in the deal and first place money 1689-1499 = 190
The difference between 2nd price and deal 1219-1499 = -280
There is 3 scenarios.
1 = deal, 2 = No deal, I win, 3 = No deal, I loose.
Scenario 1.
With the deal I give up the chance to win an extra 470, but secure 280 variance free, the difference between deal and finish 2nd (1499-1219=280). 280/2908 = 9,62% of price pool that is left.
Scenario 2.
When I win, I win 470, that is 190 more than the deal gives. (470-280=190). 190/2908 = 6,5% of the price pool left to play for
Scenario 3.
I get 1219, I loose 280 compared to the deal (1499-1219=280). I loose 470 compared to a win.
Now, how much of a edge, and how can we measure that, to fast in a deal situation estimate if our edge is big enough, and that with variance counted for we should say no to a deal and go for the win?
Hope all this makes sense and I greatly appreciate any further input.
Oh also, to add. The player I ended heads up with asked for a deal 4 handed. I was chipleader then he was 2nd in chips, the other 2 wanted a deal but I turned it down. Then first hand we got heads up to, he asked again.
And as you say Joel, I don’t initiate a deal unless we are even and I feel or know that the other player is great at heads up. As you say, I don’t want to give away weakness by starting to discuss deal.
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
24 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1