View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
ICM deal heads up?
Nervous Mike
Sweden
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 141
Member Since:
January 3, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 1, 2016 - 6:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Hello Nation. Happy New Year! 

What is your thoughts about deals heads up as a variance reducer / increasing your winning instead of finish in 2nd?

Even if you do belive you have an edge, are the chipleader (almost even in stacks, 50bbs deep, non turbo) is a deal good or bad?

Are we giving up too much of our edge by accepting a deal? Also, heads up, anything can happen.

I just had a deal, did ask for slightly more than ICM as well and got it. 

After the deal was made I have split feelings about it and that is why I make this post. 

Cheers /Mike

Sen
Sunday Major
Members
Forum Posts: 233
Member Since:
April 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
January 1, 2016 - 8:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Hi Mike,

I’ve had plenty of HU deals in 2015. So here are my thoughts on the topic:

I always tend to lean towards dealing to reduce variance, especially when:

– I feel (or even better: I know) due to poker ratings / solid stats I accumulated etc. that villain is capable/experienced in tournament HU play and a winning player in tournament poker over a large sample

– I am tired / looking forward to end the session because it’s been a long grind and/or it is late at night

– the moneybump from 2nd to 1st is significant to my BR (~10% or more)

– the structure of the tournament is shallow / blinds are low (less than 35 BB or less than M ~14) so variance is highly reduced

 

Since I often find one or more of these points to be valid, I am often leaning towards dealing. I never give in getting less than the correct chop amount and strictly cancel dealing if villain requests it. Only exception I’d make to this rule would be if the amount of money is extremly significant to my BR or villain is obviously much better than myself.
However when I feel I have a significant edge and feel still sharp and motivated I either try to get quite a bit more than correct chop numbers or I just play.

This strategy worked out perfectly for me last year. In 2014 I had a lot of trouble with my BR, struggling with variance. On the other hand in 2015 I managed to finish top 10 in the stars.fr yearly LB and I am also ranked top10 in my home-country. I am pretty certain this was only possible because I had put in a lot of effort in different areas to reduce one of the tournament-player’s most feared creature: variance.

Nervous Mike
Sweden
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 141
Member Since:
January 3, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 1, 2016 - 9:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thank you Sen for your very long and nice post. 

I really have nothing more to add than you have very nice points in your answer.
So the basic answer might be, it depends on the situation. 

I will take all this with me and might make more deals in the future and put my ego and “play to win” mentality aside. We are here to make money and if dealing can make you more money in the long run that might be the way to go. 

Very nice done to manage top 10 on .fr LB as well! gz!

Would love to hear some more input from more people 🙂

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 1, 2016 - 11:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

As others have said, depends on exactly how much you’re giving up (how good are you at HU? how good do you expect V to be?) and how significant the pay jump is to you. Ideally you wouldn’t be playing tournaments where a pay jump, even the one from 1st ot 2nd, is so large that it makes sense for you to give up a significant edge to reduce your variance.

The “it’s HU, anything can happen” mentality is not helpful. Anything can happen at any stage of the tournament. That doesn’t mean that big edges don’t exist, or that the player with the edge isn’t giving something up by making a deal.

Nervous Mike
Sweden
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 141
Member Since:
January 3, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
January 2, 2016 - 1:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Thank you Andrew.

This was a $13.50 KO tournament ($2.5 for each KO but that is irrelevant to the deal question)

I don’t think I am a great heads up player in any way, but I felt I was a better player in general than the one I ended heads up with. It’s just a general read I did have at the table, but had no real evidence such as Sharkscope or Tournament Shark to back it up with as he wasn’t OPT-in.

This was a stars tournament and there a first place in many cases can be significant to the buy in, just not huge in this case. Not that I complain about a ~100 times to the buy-in, in payouts.

Let’s add some math. (There is probably some fancy equation you can use for all this, but I’m getting older and forgot everything I did learn in school so I just put it in here as structured as I can)

$1,688.78 (1689) for 1st

$1,219.40 (1219) for 2nd

$1,499 offered for me (asked for more than ICM) and $1409 offered for my opponent. (1499-1409=90)

The total pricepool for 1st and 2nd was $2908 (1689+1219), the difference between 1st and 2nd was 1689-1219 = 470

It means that $470 (the difference between 1st and 2nd) = 16,16% (470/2908) of the total price money left to play for.

So with the difference in the deal and first place money 1689-1499 = 190
The difference between 2nd price and deal 1219-1499 = -280

There is 3 scenarios. 

1 = deal, 2 = No deal, I win, 3 = No deal, I loose. 

Scenario 1.

With the deal I give up the chance to win an extra 470, but secure 280 variance free, the difference between deal and finish 2nd (1499-1219=280). 280/2908 = 9,62% of price pool that is left. 

Scenario 2. 
When I win, I win 470, that is 190 more than the deal gives. (470-280=190). 190/2908 = 6,5% of the price pool left to play for

Scenario 3. 
I get 1219, I loose 280 compared to the deal (1499-1219=280). I loose 470 compared to a win.

Now, how much of a edge, and how can we measure that, to fast in a deal situation estimate if our edge is big enough, and that with variance counted for we should say no to a deal and go for the win?

Hope all this makes sense and I greatly appreciate any further input.

joelshitshow
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 582
Member Since:
February 20, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 2, 2016 - 4:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

It feels like the person initiating the deal has less leverage. Does anyone initiate a deal, and if so, how do you get fair value when it could be inferred that you’re desperate/afraid?

Nervous Mike
Sweden
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 141
Member Since:
January 3, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
January 2, 2016 - 4:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Oh also, to add. The player I ended heads up with asked for a deal 4 handed. I was chipleader then he was 2nd in chips, the other 2 wanted a deal but I turned it down. Then first hand we got heads up to, he asked again. 

And as you say Joel, I don’t initiate a deal unless we are even and I feel or know that the other player is great at heads up. As you say, I don’t want to give away weakness by starting to discuss deal. 

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
24 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12008

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1