hey guys ,
i am new to the site and relatively new to mtt's. i have been playing one man sit n go's for a while now and have alot to learn about mtt's. my question relates to when the antes are introduced. in a one man the antes do not play as signifigant a role as they do in mtt's. i was wondering what the prefeered way to adjust for them is. i have watched a few of the mtt videos and it seems the instructors just base thier decisions on the number of big blinds they have even when the antes are a signifigant portion of the pot. i never hear anything about ” harringtons m ” or about ” effecive big blinds “. when i say effective big blinds i am referring to the big blind being adjusted to 67 % of the total pot. as an example, if the table were 8 handed and the blinds were 200/ 400 with 25 antes the total pot would be 800, 67 % of 800 would be about 525, making the big blind 525 as opposed to 400 which would effectively reduce your stack size affecting the range you may push. i read about effective stack size in moshmans new book,” the math of holdem “. i was wondering how practical it is to use “m” or effective bb or should i just be judging my stack by the actual # of bb's i have ? sorry i know my first post was a ramble but i am really hoping one of the instructors could give me an opinion.
thank you, frank
October 6, 2010
the reason people don't use m that much is just the fact that there are two pretty distinct strategies for pre and post antes, and you can talk about bbs in both scenarios. m is kind of an all encompassing stat, but the strategies still change.
so in general, it doesn't really matter whether you talk about m, effective bb's or actual bbs, as long as you are stack size aware, and actual bb's is just the easiest i think.
October 6, 2010
its definitely much easier to count, especially live, which i think is why bb's is easier
I think the specific thing to be aware of is the ratio of ante to sb – its usually 25% of sb on stars and the Full tilt tourneys I used to play (RIP!) – if its higher or lower its worth adjusting but this is essentially giving you your M – but in a more approximate way.
Same as all have said so far – outcome is the same, whilst easier to keep track of….
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
22 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1