October 8, 2015
Greetings TPE nation! Brozathon here (Broz for short), just became a member of TPE a few days ago (and I’m loving it so far) so this is my first post 🙂
First a little background on me. I’m 25 and just started playing poker for the first time ever last year around May. I wasn’t serious about it at all I was just a scrubby fish/donkey that deposited and lost his money about 3 times over ($150 or so). I took another stab at it earlier this year, but again I wasn’t all that serious about it and never studied the different concepts of poker strategy in general ever. I did find success in binking $1 and $3 sit n go’s from time to time, but whenever it came to cash games I would just lose all my money playing like a scrub.
So come about 2 months ago, I decided to be definite about improving my poker game and found that I actually really love the feeling playing in a huge MTT invokes within especially when you run really deep in one. So I started gearing my studying toward MTTs and 1 table sit n go strategy.
Of course I lost my money again (about $70 this time) due to poor bankroll management and the angst that seeing a diminishing bankroll brings along with the beats, but now I have a plan of action concerning my bankroll, I just have to wait about 2 weeks or so for my first paycheck at my new job, which leads to the actual question at hand…
I live in the states and can only play on ACR, Bovada, etc. (Texas) So I I’ve pretty much been stuck playing Freerolls on ACR for the last month trying to apply the different strategical concepts that I’ve been learning. I feel like my MTT game has improved dramatically as these freerolls have allowed me to feel what it’s like to run super deep in a somewhat large field of entrants, how to somewhat play deep stacked, how to play on the bubble, and a host of other pretty invaluable experiences that can only come from, well, experience.
However, as I wait to provide myself a bankroll, I’m starting to think playing in these freerolls is beginning to become detrimental to my overall game. For example, usually there are just a bunch of monkeys at the beginning of these frerolls that jam all in with any 2 every single hand hoping to get lucky and a lot of the time they do get sucked out and have monstrous stacks that I have to be wary of. To combat this I started playing SUPER duper tight at the start of these tourneys just waiting for 10s+ or AQ/AK to get it in with and double up. Then the process would repeat itself. I felt like I couldn’t play any “true” poker until the all-in feast was over and I had won enough flips to amass a significant amount of chips. Usually at that point I am able to make moves and top up my stack with the various tactics that I’ve been learning and almost always make a final table, top 3-5, or win 1-3 of these freerolls everyday.
My concern is that with playing against so many monkeys (sorry if that term offends anyone I just love calling super loose crazies monkeys) all the time, I feel I will accrue habitual tendencies that will hurt my game in the long run when I start to play higher stakes. I feel like these tendencies will be harder to rid myself of if I continue to play in these freerolls as much as i’ve been playing them and I just don’t like that feeling at all. So I’ve decided to just watch a bunch of videos and continue trying to asses and understand various strategical and mathematical concepts until I’m able to play for stakes. So the question is, will it be enough for me to just study without playing for a while, or will playing and trying to improve my play in these freerolls be better than not playing at all? Is there a point of diminishing return when concerning skill building through freerolls? Or am I just over thinking the whole thing?
I know it has only been a month and some days or so that I’ve been playing them, and it will only be another 2 weeks more, but I am sure there are plenty of other people out there without bankrolls having to grind these things out, so hopefully this post will provide an empathetic insight from a fellow freeroll grinder and they don’t get trapped in thinking they’re creating great long lasting habits when they could possibly be subtly destroying their game or vice-versa.
Sorry for the length of this lol, but writing out thoughts is always therapeutic and fun for me. Thanks for reading if you do!!
October 8, 2015
Thanks Foucalt!
Well that’s what I’m sort of trying to figure out. Since I don’t have much experience at playing MTTs other than freerolls, I’m not sure if the environment in which I’m trying to level my attributes is conducive to my long term desires which are to become a mid-high stakes consistently profitable player.
I feel like the beginning of the freerolls are a huge joke and I’m not getting any real experience on how to pick up chips other than jamming all in with a premium hand against a monkey (lol), hoping to double up, and then doing that again once or twice to build a big enough stack to work with.
I was playing a $1 tourney the other day with some of my freeroll winnings, and while it’s a super low buy in, there definitely weren’t that many “all in any 2” players there, but for some reason my play just felt out of wack in the early stages because I was so used to waiting for a premium to jam in and get my quick double up instead of actually playing out early game dynamics. I guess I sort of treated that tournament like a freeroll one even though it wasn’t, but I was just so used to that freeroll format that I failed to implement any other early game strategy because I lacked the finesse to do so.
That’s when I realized I’d rather just stop playing the freerolls and wait to get the experience I need in the early stages to allow me the chance to go deep because there won’t always be that guy who punts off his stack with any 2 basically giving away free chips.
But ya anyways I might just be overthinking it and kind of answering myself a lot, I’m just curious as to how you pro gods view freerolls as a tool for improvement if you view it as that at all?
TPE Pro
December 6, 2012
Recognizing the mistakes your opponents are making and devising strategies to exploit those mistakes to the maximum is the most fundamental poker skill there is. What changes is that those mistakes are smaller and harder to spot among better players, but it’s nice to be able to practice with weak players first. It certainly doesn’t seem like you’ve maxed out your ability to improve in the games you’re playing now. For example, if you think someone is jamming any two or anything close to any two, why are you folding AJ and 99 to that shove?
October 8, 2015
Well my thought process behind such a tight range is basically built around the core of the strategy that these players are employing. At the surface it seems really dumb to be jamming in any 2, but when you really think about it it’s an incredibly strong strategy as well since their ranges are completely balanced 100%. You don’t know if they’ve suddenly woken up with AA, KK, or if they just have complete garbage because they are literally jamming it in every hand. So my thinking is, I want to give myself the greatest possible chance at winning my flip and just felt like AJ was right outside of that range as well as anything lower than 10s beacuase they’re just that much more vulnerable to being dominated. AJ not so much, and honestly I probably would call a jam with it, but A10 is definitely pushing it for me. However with this range I have been fairly successful although it is on the super nitty side.
It’s humbling to read your insight. And it makes sense that an inexorable change in your core strategy will come along not only at different stakes, but against different players and table dynamics within the same stakes so the attribute of adaptation in itself is of significant value which would make playing in these freerolls help to build that attribute in a polar region.
I will continue to play in these freerolls for the time being as I now see more value in doing so thanks to you Foucault (just realized you are Andrew Brokos lol, hello) and will hone my skill enough to be able to crush these consistently before moving up. I still play like a monkey myself sometimes so definitely have a ton of work to do so thanks man.
Also when my journey begins (for stakes), I’ll be streaming it (within 2 weeks), so will be posting in the goals section soon, cheers!
October 8, 2015
Yes thanks Joel, it does helps when you put it in terms of percentages. I never really think like that and am just always afraid that I could be up against better. This will definitely help me adjust my range and help me read ranges with more clarity so definitely helpful, thanks
September 29, 2012
A player with 100% is definitely not balanced. Just because a player has strong hands and weak hands in their range does not make a balance. Balance is when the player is betting the right amount of strong hands for the size of the bet he is making compared to the stack sizes and balanced with the right amount of weak hands in proportion to the amount of the bet and the amount of strong hands. Let’s analyze this for a sec.
On the ACR freerolls the stacks start at 3k. If a player shoves from UTG on the first hand, what hands are strong enough to shove. What if he is shoving top 5%. Let’s look at AQo. And imagine only getting called by premium hands JJ+ and AK.
cEV[AQ] = 78% * 60 + 22%[(6,060 * 28%) – 3,000] = -240 cEV. Which means that top 5% is too wide to shove profitably this deep.
Let’s look at hands in the top 3%. The bottom of that range is JJ and AKo. Assuming the same value calling range.
cEV[JJ] = 78% * 60 + 22%[(6,060 * 37%) – 3,000] = -120 cEV
cEV[AK] = 78% * 60 + 22%[(6,060 * 40%) – 3,000] = -80 cEV
So AK and JJ are not profitable open shoves this deep. They obviously can be if the players call off too wide, but they are exploitable if the players call off at the appropriate amount. And since we are discussing balance, which is a GTO concept, we should keep the analysis within GTO reason.
Now let’s look at QQ
cEV[QQ] = = 78% * 60 + 22%[(6,060 * 47%) – 3,000] = 13 cEV
So we need to get to QQ+ before we find a profitable shove. The villains can shove 1.36% of all hands for a profit here. Now the balance of a range is derived from the size of the value range in relation to the size of the bet compared to the pot. Since the bet is such an oversized bet of the pot, (3000 into a pot of 60) the result will be about 98%, let’s for simplicity round up to 100% here to illustrate this point.
So the balance “bluff” range should be 100% as large as the value range. If the value range is 1.36% his bluff range should be 1.36%. The total range should be 2.72% of all hands.
Therefore, if the villain is shoving 100% of all hands, then he is incredibly unbalanced.
Now that my mathematical derailment of this thread is over, we can resume discussion. I just wanted to clear up the misconception discussed that the deep shove with ATC is balanced.
October 8, 2015
Just got totally mind fucked by those calculations lol, only thing is the ACR freerolls actually start at 1500 chips with 15/30 blinds i believe. Don’t know how significantly that would effect the calculations, i tried using the equations but failed miserably lol definitely need to freshen up on my mathematics. :p
October 8, 2015
So after continuing to play these freerolls on ACR since my original post, I’ve come to a few conclusions.
First, as Foucault stated, “Recognizing the mistakes your opponents are making and devising strategies to exploit those mistakes to the maximum is the most fundamental poker skill there is” with that I agree 100%. I’ve gained great value from playing in these freerolls from my mistakes and victories alike such as: How it feels to run deep in a fairly sized field; How it feels to play on the bubble of a tournament you run deep in; What it feels like to be short stacked at various parts of the tournament; How to deal with the super loose and sticky players that the freerolls are infested with; How to exploit these players for maximum value when I make my hand; All of this amongst a rail of other experiences that I’ve gained knowledge from to my benefit.
I’ve literally been either studying or playing poker everyday from 5-10 hours since deciding to become definite in improving my poker game about two months ago, so while it’s true that I only started playing some time last year, I feel I have built enough of a solid base of fundamentals to allow me to perform much better than I ever have in buy-in tournaments. But obviously my results will speak for themselves on whether or not I become a consistently winning player.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Now secondly and more importantly, I realized I was concerned more about the time investment factor than the “skill erosion” factor which I now believe is actually non-existent (the skill erosion factor that is) if you’re a competent thinking player. How can your skill actually erode if you know that the unorthodox decisions that you’re making in certain spaces of a freeroll will probably only apply to that freeroll? If you know you’re making certain plays that you can probably only get away with making in a freeroll, then there is no diminishing return skill-wise, rather you probably become even more aware of each circumstance you are in whether it be a freeroll, low stakes, mid or high, and adjust your play accordingly.
The time investment is where you start to build an argument for not playing freerolls. Even I, who at the moment has no bankroll, find these freerolls to be quite trivial when looking at opportunity costs. I could be doing plenty of things of more value to my life than sitting for hours on end grinding these freerolls for literal pennies and a seat to a satalite. If I seem like a pretentious ingrate to you just picture yourself grinding out 10 hours of freerolls a day for a top prize of $2.55. Even if you were to bink each and every one you play, let’s say you play about 15 in that time, you’re essentially making $3.80 an hour, and that’s first place every time. I feel I’ve performed fairly well to this point in the freerolls I’ve participated in by winning and making numerous final tables as well as binking a satalite ticket, but the ROI, being a time investment and the return being the winnings as well as the experience gained, just cannot justify continuing to play these any further.
I understand there are probably greater value freerolls on a site like pokerstars, but seeing that ACR is the only on demand freeroll site I can play on atm, I just can’t allow myself to invest anymore time into them for the reasons I’ve stated. Of course I will still be studying poker with the help of TPE amongst other resources, but just thought I’d post again to kind of recap my thoughts on the whole deal.
Thank you guys for your responses!
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
92 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1