This seems pretty button-clicky to me, and by that I mean I don’t really like it.

Calling preflop is fine, and I don’t even think it’s necessarily bad to have a leading range on this flop (even into two players, one of whom has an uncapped range), but I think AJo is the wrong hand to do it with. You have very little equity versus calling ranges and few outs on later streets. Leading out here with your sets/2pairs/straight draws is fine, but there’s no reason to do it with random overcards.

On the turn, I can understand giving up when you get called in two spots, but the fact that you so rarely pick up equity here and therefore can continue betting is why AJo is a poor hand to put in your leading range.

River…I’m not really sure what you’re trying to represent. Neither villain is going to fold a Tx hand and you don’t really represent any strong hands any more after checking the turn, so your range doesn’t really look like it has much value in it. You block AT and JT which I suppose is a good thing, but those hands would likely bet the turn some % of the time.

Don’t get too caught up in thinking in terms of whether something “works” or “doesn’t work”. That’s an assessment that’s grounded in the hand you’re playing right now, whereas you should be trying to think theoretically about your entire range in these situations. You don’t always want this play to ‘work’, because sometimes you want to have value here – if you never take this line for value, you’re playing super exploitably and that’s a bad habit to get into, even if weaker players won’t exploit you.