I like betting the flop small as mentioned by Foucault. Although this is a fairly wet board for tight ranges, it is not nearly as dynamic vs. a blind defending range. I think we could reasonably build a strategy around betting small with our entire betting range. Assuming you are raising ~45-60% from the button you have range advantage (and nut advantage) on high flops vs. any reasonable BB flatting range. I have not played much 3 max, so the tendencies may be different, but I think there are better ways for villain to play marginal 1 pair hands than check-raising, so I would not expect a strong opponent is planning to do so frequently at 28bb effective. I guess we can expect more aggressive/high variance play than usual because of recent bubble, but I don’t think that is enough to justify a huge adjustment to our betting range.

On turn I think we should bet as played, but I don’t hate checking back if we had bet the flop. After villain has already called a bet, at this stack depth, I don’t know if we have enough fold equity and/or implied odds to blindly re-open the betting when we can collect our equity by checking back. Value hands like many Aces and Kings might prefer a bet-check-bet line on this runout, so if we want to have some bluffs in that range I think 87s fits reasonably well.

I think we want to fold our flush draw to the turn check-raise. If villain never has bigger hearts we have a good price, but the blocker/cooler effect when they do is pretty huge and, either way, we are almost never winning the hand if we don’t hit our flush.

I have a question. My instinct is that if we bet flop and face a similar size check-raise it is a much better spot to continue than on the turn, but I’m not sure if that’s entirely true. I think we can call a turn shove on any 8 or 7, whereas I would be uncomfortable doing so on the river after a turn check-raise. Is that enough of a reason to make calling a flop check-raise okay?