View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
Facing BTN shove 7.5BB with A3o in SB with 23bb stack deep in Micro $22
improvementss
Lighting Money On Fire
Members
Forum Posts: 25
Member Since:
September 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 12, 2016 - 10:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Hey all,

A friend of mine played the following hand in the $22 Micro event yesterday. We were trying to figure out if this is a good shove spot but couldn’t come to a conclusion.

 I plugged in the hand into ICMizer 2 and it shows we have a +0.4BB Cev spot assuming villian shoves 43%.

Villian arrived to the table 2 hands ago so we assume V shoves nash ranges although I believe in general players would play a bit tighter. According to Nash, this is a +0.4BB cEV. Should we take this rather marginal spot or do we prefer to lower variance and preserve our 23BB stack to find a more +cEV (potentially reshove) spot in this case?

In addition, we are with 680 left and the next pay jump takes place around 500. Does this influences our decision slightly or is too far away to consider ICM here?

 Would really appreciate some thoughts, Thanks!

  

PokerStars Hand #162806847882: Tournament #1734197337, $20+$2 USD Hold’em No Limit – Level XXXIV (17500/35000) – 2016/12/11 20:30:37 ET
Table ‘1734197337 2264’ 9-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: TonanZ88 (3532041 in chips) 
Seat 2: Deniseus (1223257 in chips) 
Seat 3: foxxx55525 (535127 in chips) 
Seat 4: kiko72 (564210 in chips) 
Seat 5: future181 (268866 in chips) 
Seat 6: kamerik20jr (821156 in chips) 
Seat 7: YuliyaSereda (358172 in chips) 
Seat 8: sazu79 (1197260 in chips) 
Seat 9: Heliodosreis (529414 in chips) 
TonanZ88: posts the ante 3500
Deniseus: posts the ante 3500
foxxx55525: posts the ante 3500
kiko72: posts the ante 3500
future181: posts the ante 3500
kamerik20jr: posts the ante 3500
YuliyaSereda: posts the ante 3500
sazu79: posts the ante 3500
Heliodosreis: posts the ante 3500
hero posts small blind 17500
YuliyaSereda: posts big blind 35000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Hero[3c Ah]
sazu79: folds 
Heliodosreis: folds 
TonanZ88: folds 
Deniseus: folds 
foxxx55525: folds 
kiko72: folds 
future181: raises 230366 to 265366 and is all-in

almofadinhas
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 586
Member Since:
June 2, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 13, 2016 - 10:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I think I would try to isolate this one, BB has 10bb stack, but he won´t wake up with strong hands that often, and BTN shoving range should be wide enough to make A3o profitable. Considering an unknown V.

theginger45

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 924
Member Since:
August 25, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 14, 2016 - 6:30 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

+0.4bb is +40bb/100. That’s not marginal. If you’re a very good 8bb player you might just about manage a 4bb/100 winrate at these stacks, meaning you make 0.04bb/hand. If that’s your winrate and you fold this spot, it takes you ten hands to get back what you gave away.

In reality, a lot of people’s winrates at these stacks are just above breakeven or even negative, and I would imagine that since you’re asking this question there’s at least a chance you’re in one of those categories. In that event, it might take you 40, 50 or 100 hands to recover what you give away by folding a +0.4bb spot.

Folding here isn’t lower variance, it’s just a mistake, especially since the BB only has 10bb so you don’t even bust if you get overcalled. “Lowering variance” is just something people say to justify being risk-averse.

It’s also worth noting that the idea of “we should only call Nash if villain is shoving Nash” is a common misconception. Nash ranges are universally more profitable, because if villain shoves too wide, the top of our range benefits, and if they shove too tight, we benefit from them folding more. Anything villain does that isn’t Nash, we profit. If we have a reliable read we can go with, maybe we can fold a little more or call a little more, but to be honest you’re unlikely to ever play enough short-stacked hands against someone to get anything more than a broad assumption about their shoving ranges.

As far as the money jump goes, if we’re 180 people away then it’s not a consideration at all, so no need to worry about that.

In general, absolutely everyone massively overestimates their edge at short stacks. It would benefit you (OP) and probably everyone else in here to completely eliminate the phrase “wait for a better spot” from your poker vocabulary. You don’t know what spots are going to come up later. You need to take the profit that is offered to you here and now.

improvementss
Lighting Money On Fire
Members
Forum Posts: 25
Member Since:
September 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 14, 2016 - 8:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thanks a lot for the clear and detailed explanation! Gonna work on those spots and try to not miss any of those in the future!

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
20 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Philbro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12007

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1