View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
Facing a 3bet LP wiith AQs 25bb stack in 'hot 10'
improvementss
Lighting Money On Fire
Members
Forum Posts: 25
Member Since:
September 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 1, 2016 - 7:40 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Poker Stars $10+$1 No Limit Hold’em Tournament – t800/t1600 Blinds + t200 – 9 players – View hand 2962484

 

Hero (CO): t44436 M = 10.58

BTN: t69208 M = 16.48

SB: t61064 M = 14.54

BB: t86927 M = 20.70

UTG: t26878 M = 6.40

UTG+1: t23297 M = 5.55

UTG+2: t23402 M = 5.57

MP1: t55934 M = 13.32

MP2: t10694 M = 2.55

 

Pre Flop: (t4200) Hero is CO with A Q  

5 folds, Hero raises to t3200, BTN raises to t6900, 2 folds, hero: Call vs all in???

————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

I played this hand yesterday in the Hot 11. Villain is an unknown. I had only two hands on him up until this moment. Two valid options seems to be (1) 4-Bet Jam, or (2) Call his 3bet and evaluate flop.

To decide I have to put villain on ranges. What ranges would we give villain in this situation for 3 betting me and what % of his range for overcalling my 4bet jam.

When I put Villian on a 7,1% 3bet range (88+, ATs+, AQo+, TJs,T9s & 89s)

and an overcall range of 5,1% (99+, AQo+, AQs+), the 4bet jam options seems slightly negative Chip EV. In this case calling the 3bet OOP seems favorable.

Do you guys think I assess the situation correctly, and also do you believe the range I assigned to his 3bet and overcall range are realistic for an unknown in a ‘Hot 10’ tourney?

Look forward to you thoughts on this hand.

Thanks in advance!

joelshitshow
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 582
Member Since:
February 20, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 1, 2016 - 11:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

How close to the money are you?

improvementss
Lighting Money On Fire
Members
Forum Posts: 25
Member Since:
September 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 1, 2016 - 12:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I believe we are just ITM here. Not 100% but assuming thats the case!

theginger45

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 924
Member Since:
August 25, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
October 2, 2016 - 5:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Seems pretty tough not to go all-in here. I think your 3-betting range for villain is not polarized enough since BTN almost certainly has a flat-calling range versus your open, and I have a feeling your math might be off with regard to the shove being -cEV. If villain were 3-betting 7% and calling it off with 5% then they’re folding to your 4-bet shove around 28% of the time, and I can’t see a hand as strong as AQs not being profitable when we have a decent amount of fold equity like that.

I also think it’s worth noting that on most flops that are good for AQs (flush draws, Q high, A high mostly) you’re rarely going to be able to get value or get it all-in against worse, but you’re not going to be able to fold in the event that your opponent has AK/KK/AA. I think your best shot at realising all your equity here is to get it in, as long as we have roughly the amount of fold equity you think we do.

That said, I haven’t run the numbers so I might be slightly off, and I think a hand like ATs or AJo is fairly close since those are less playable as a flat-call.

improvementss
Lighting Money On Fire
Members
Forum Posts: 25
Member Since:
September 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 3, 2016 - 4:33 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thanks for the feedback. You are probably right that my range includes a big part of villain’s flat-calling range. After polarizing the range and doing the math again this spot seems +cEV after all. 

theginger45

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 924
Member Since:
August 25, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
October 3, 2016 - 9:30 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

improvementss said
Thanks for the feedback. You are probably right that my range includes a big part of villain’s flat-calling range. After polarizing the range and doing the math again this spot seems +cEV after all.   

Glad to know my instincts were somewhat accurate!

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
78 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Philbro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12007

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1