View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
did i get too impatient or is this a shove with my stack
bjizzle44
Guest
Guests
1
June 4, 2010 - 5:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

had a nice stack but got short as I always seem to do. But n e way is this the correct shove or did I get too impatient. table had gotten pretty tight. I was able to shove atleast 4 times b4 I finally got action. wrong hand to shove through entire table i’m thinking

 

PokerStars No-Limit Hold’em, 4.4 Tournament, 150/300 Blinds 25 Ante (9 handed) – Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

SB (t11173)
BB (t9423)
Hero (UTG) (t2475)
UTG+1 (t17969)
MP1 (t8411)
MP2 (t5590)
MP3 (t1706)
CO (t9452)
Button (t7810)

Hero’s M: 3.67

Preflop: Hero is UTG with K, J
Hero bets t2450 (All-In), 3 folds, MP3 calls t1681 (All-In), 2 folds, SB calls t2300, 1 fold

Flop: (t7106) 10, 8, 5 (3 players, 2 all-in)

Turn: (t7106) Q (3 players, 2 all-in)

River: (t7106) 7 (3 players, 2 all-in)

Total pot: t7106

Hagbard Celine
Guest
Guests
2
June 4, 2010 - 10:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

shove is perfectly fine. shove KTs as well.

Budr8cin
Guest
Guests
3
June 5, 2010 - 1:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I shove here to,  play by the bigdogs rule of 15-20 bb. 

rh300487
Guest
Guests
4
June 5, 2010 - 10:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Hagbard Celine said:

shove is perfectly fine. shove KTs as well.


What do you expect there calling ranges to be ?

I didn’t do deep math yet but if I view there calling ranges (obv we get protection) of 55+,A2s+,KJs+,QJs,A8o+,KQo.
KTs would be unprofitable. KJs is marginally cEV (increase of 0.1M) but I would shove here given the fact we hit the blinds the next round and we don’t have any bubble factors/pay jumps to consider.

 

Shoving is fine here, as well as any pocket pair, A9o+, A8s+ and off course KJs+

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
5
June 6, 2010 - 12:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Fist pump and get it in.

Hagbard Celine
Guest
Guests
6
June 6, 2010 - 12:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

highly doubt “their” calling ranges include A2s, QJs, A8o, etc. maybe there’s one person at the table capable of calling some of those hands, but to assume they are in the calling ranges of the table in general is wrong imo.

 

sure jamming KJs is going to be marginally +cEV here, but that’s more EV than folding!

rh300487
Guest
Guests
7
June 6, 2010 - 1:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I agree there calling range is to wide.. 88+ ATs+ AJo+ KQs would be way more reasonable. 

Against this range we can go way wider to be honest when shoving here UTG. A2s+, K2s+, Q4s+, J7s+, T6s+ etc. Even 34s would be a profitable shove. 

It’s cool to see the impact of your hands being suited adds so much value towards your shoving range. For example, A9o is a fold, whereas Q4s is a +cEV shove.

rh300487
Guest
Guests
8
June 6, 2010 - 1:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

EV of a fold is always 0.. right>?

Hagbard Celine
Guest
Guests
9
June 7, 2010 - 1:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

yeah EV of a fold is always 0, no matter how much you “have invested” in teh pot

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
41 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Philbro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12007

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1