November 18, 2013
22 player left out of 300 in $350 live tournament. There is a small pay jump at 21, but it's $200 compared to $24K top prize.
Hero has 6 BB after losing a big pot JJ < ATs. Table is 7 handed.
V1 and V2 are both old school straighforward tight retired grandpa types. They have farily clear, well-defined ranges, don't 3-bet as a bluff and probably haven't studied Push/fold charts, etc. They are solid and patient but not particularly adapting to tournament play.
Blinds 3000/6000/1000
V1 raises 14K UTG
V2 Calls MP1
Action folds to hero in BB with 35K. I have pocket 4s.
Here are my options
– call and setmine (which seems crazy since giving up will leave me with under 4 BB)
– shove and hope that either I hit a set or both villains have big aces and miss
– fold and hope for a spot with some fold equity, a slightly better hand, or wait for a $200 pay bump when the next player busts
If you're not shoving 44 here, what is the worst hand you would shove?
April 26, 2013
In an online tourney I'd snap get it in and hope to double/triple up. I only play $40 and below, though. Against avg. villains ranges I think this would be +EV play for sure. But with you describing villains as tight straight-forward I believe their UTG/MP range crushes you. So I'd fold. With your stacksize setmining is definitly -EV!
Worst hand to shove… maybe 66, ATs, AJo.
What happened, what do people think that have more experience in these stakes and live? Interesting post!
November 18, 2013
So if I shove, most likely scenario is that both villains call and check it down unless one has a monster. While I don't think this is the optimal play for either one of them, it seems a pretty common pattern for older, live, conservative players. In theory it makes sense for one to re-raise to trap the dead money in the pot and get me alone. But if these players were theoretically sound, it wouldn't be such a profitable tournament. Anyway, in the likely, more passive scenario, the pot will be 117K and I will be up against two strong ranges. If I fold, I will have 29K left. So from a strict cEV standpoint, if my equity in the pot will give me better than 29K, I should shove. Since there's so much dead money from the antes, the break even point is a hand with about 25% equity against their ranges. (29/117).
Obviously the key variable will be my villain's holdings. Given the player type, I assume V1 will have a strong, uncapped range, while V2s range will be strong but probably capped. V2 is less likely to call QQ+ or AKs but he's also more likely to have some medium pairs that dominate me, so something like {99+,ATs+,KJs+,AJo+,KQo} for V1 and {JJ-66, ATs+, KJs+, QJs, AJo+, KQo} for V2. Against these specific ranges I only have 28% equity but that's still a better expected cEV than folding. Of course my range assumptions could be off. The more pairs I put in the villain's ranges and the more unpaired hands I remove, the worse my equity is. If they both have overpairs my equity is only 15%. If one has an overpair and one has AK, my equity is only 19%. But the situations where they both have unpaired overcards, and espeically when those cards are shared are best for me. For example if one has AKo and one has KQs my equity is 42% and in the extremely lucky situation where they both have AQo my equity has 61%.
Folding might get me another $200 in the short-term, but first prize is 24K, so I think it shouldn't be a big factor in my decision.
Weighing all these factors, I think a gamble is justified and probably preferable to a fold. I'm too short and villains are too deep to assume I have much fold equity in the near future.
November 18, 2013
As far as worst hands to shove, If I keep the range assumptions for the villains, and use 25% equity as the threshold, here's a few of my findings
– A5s has 25% equity which is right on the cusp. For other suited aces, the potential for a wheel makes a difference. A6s-A9s were folds while ATs was a call. For reasons that I don't understand, A4s-A2s were below 25% when they seem to be exactly the same hand
– Offsuit aces perform badly against the top hands. A6o has less than 20% so it's a fold. Actually most offsuit aces aren't strong enough since they are so often dominated. Even AJo is a fold with only 24.5% while AQo has a decent 30% chance.
– KQo is a fold since it is so often dominated. it only has 23% equity
– Suited broadways fare better. KTs and QTs are both over 25% against these strong ranges.
– Suited connectors and gappers do better than weak aces two players who are likely to have pairs. 76s is much better than A6o with almost 28%. 75s is at 26%. 74s is actually better than A6o but it's just under the 25% threshold.
So my shoving range here would be something like {22+, ATs+, KTs+, QTs+, AQo+} and any suited connecters and one gappers down to 53s and 43s
I think you have to shove here and hope that they both have overcards but no pairs. If they do, that's a bummer. But you have 6bb and your options are pretty limited. You have a pair. You only get a pair 1/17 times. Sometimes if you fold waiting for a better spot they never come. I think you have to gamble here and hope to triple up.
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
63 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1