i'd bet smaller on the flop and turn for pot controll. someone could've been slowplaying a flopped flush or a set scared of a flush. Bet about 1/2 pot and you would've saved urself about 30k leaving urself 195k instead of 166k. Unless villain has an ace he's checking back the river for showdown value if he has something like K10, Q10, J10 or maybe even QQ scared of KK, AA from an utg raiser. Or small/mid pairs that put you on AJ+. 

So like Benny said, there are a lot of hands w the ace of clubs in villain's range, although I dont see anyone calling a big bet on the turn w just the nut fd, but in the microstakes players are that bad to do so. And if ur betting almost 1/2 ur stack on the turn u might as well have shoved the turn imo. KQo, KJo, QJo w a club couldve also been in villains range for a gutter and fd that missed.

So I'm starting to think that there are some bluffs in villains range as well, but I think those hands wouldve giving up after the turn in most cases. So not really sure which hands would bluff the river. There's definitely no point in shoving the river for value or getting villain off from a worse hand.

If you checked the river and villain shoves ur getting almost 4-1 on a call making it possibly a profitable call if villain were to bluff here often. Giving the pot size and villains remaining stack it def gives villain a big reason to (bluff)shove river.

By shoving the river the only hands that would fold w showdownvalue are QQ, 55-88 and a ten (unless A10). So i'd go for pot controll first and checking the river and contemplating calling of over 1/2 ur stack, as mentioned if you'd only bet 1/2 pot twice, you'd have 195k left and villain 130k, so you'd had to call off 2/3 ur stack w a bluffcatcher. This would've made it easier to c/f river and still leave you w 30bb to play with. So my answer is probably pot controll.

As played i would c/c river for pot odds seeing there are some bluffs in villains range, but not a lot since villain called two big bets for over half his stack. Seeing villain only had 1.5 pot sizebet left after the flop, ur ultimate decision shouldve been on the turn, either c/c, c/f (dont really see this happening) or just shoving the river for protection/value from (combo)draws. Or just checking turn for pot controll and reassess.

Lol, getting confused my self. Like to hear some more opinions. TPE pros, where are u?

Crazy hand. Flatting pre in the BB wiht so many callers. I like the line you took. You could have bet smaller…but I'm not too picky about it. But the river is a def check/fold. YOu're already trying to convince him that you have a high flush when he is calling all streets.

Let's suppose he has the ATx in his hand, which is what I would have put him on, that river should kill us. I think YOu're just getting very few folds if he has come along this far. What hands can he have that he is calling through the turn and folding on the river? Maybe the KK or QQ? That's a big maybe. FOr me, too much of a maybe to pull this risky of a move….especially readless…and that is the biggest factor.

What do you guys think of overbet/shoving turn?