View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
Day 2 restart of Monster Stack
ltcolumbo
the D
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 161
Member Since:
May 20, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
June 30, 2014 - 12:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Day 2 of monster deep stacks and I lost a flip I needed to win. [For the 10 hands of day 1 leading up to this one, see my blog post], which is followed by what seems to me to be a pretty good spot…

 

The set-up: I call a shove from MP 14k stack with AKs from the BB and a stack of 25k.  He has TT and I brick out.  

 

I have just 11.5k at 400/800/100 towards the end of level and it folds to button who has maybe 15k.  He reluctantly min-raises, after looking to fold then realizing he was the button.   I know that look.  I pretend to look at my cards and shove 11.5k over his 1600.  BB (not a large stack either, but has me covered) wakes up with KK.  gg me. 

(Although I discussed very briefly with TTWIST), I continue to assume that I am correct here on both plays and just my usual anti-luckbox?

CCuster 911
Delaware

TPE Pro
Forum Posts: 187
Member Since:
September 28, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
July 2, 2014 - 6:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Seems fine.

 

I would also be careful about that asumption.  I have seen some tricky live players who did the fake, o wait I am in LP, I raise, thing before and actually have a hand.  Or maybe I am just bad at picking up reads.

For Coaching - ccuster911@gmail.com - HH Reviews/Leak Finder(HEM or PT)/Concept Discussion

jacobsharktank
Florida
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 547
Member Since:
December 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
July 4, 2014 - 5:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0
Shove and get called, .2949 equity stack = 25,900, p = .0664 range = 99+ ATs+ AJo+
Shove and get folds, stack = 15,200 p= .9336
Fold, Stack = 11,500 p = 1

.2949 x 25900 x .0664 = 507.16 
15,200 x .9336 = 14190.72 
14697.88 against fold stack of 11500 nets 

3197.87 chips


Adding QQ+ adds 18 hands with a probability of idk 20% (for reverse tells?), adds 3.6 combos of hands to 88 instead of 18. Thats actually only .2% of hands, so like I guess it doesn't effect it much. If you see players do this regularly with weak hands, (when it comes up, they don't have strong hands), then it follows that unless a villain who is capable of adding the reverse tell in sometimes, it's still +ev. That's just because people do it with weak hands on accident, signalling their range. Even if it could mean both ranges, it's probably going to be a weak range a majority of the time if you see this that often.

Okay so yah I don't know. I wasn't expecting it at face value to be this profitable, but I don't know. I'm all about constructing a range, and it's just hard for me to accept that 100% of hands works here.

About half of the live poker I've played has taken place in the last year, so these things are still new to me. But I think I'm learning something here haha. Range work is still what's taking place, it's just that the button defines his range as weak with a high probability in that exact observation. Interesting.

Initially, my gut 3b shove range here is 30% of hands, which has higher equity against a calling range, the same fold equity, and doing the math just now, it comes out to a difference in profit of only 100 chips. Risk of busto is so low. It's less than 7%...so that means every time it's passed on, with the equity of .29, it's passing on something +2bb in EV. 
I think now I'm all about this. Math, you win.
ltcolumbo
the D
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 161
Member Since:
May 20, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
July 5, 2014 - 3:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I did get some input from a very good player that despite all this, his min shove range there is 66+, ATo+ which seems like he is passing up too much opportunity.  And yet, that seems to be a similar stance to that of jacobsharktank.

 

Should I be looking at these “obvious spots” with range colored glasses instead of opportunistic ones and only making this move with say 22+, Axs, Kxs?  or is this just over analyzing based on results?

jacobsharktank
Florida
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 547
Member Since:
December 24, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
July 5, 2014 - 7:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

To be honest, I'm not sure 100%. Do you follow the math that I wrote out? Because based on that, if your read on the situation is 100% or if it's mixed, as long as you quantify that information, you can do it yourself and see profitability. 

 

I don't think spots like these are necessarily obvious. A lot of players still fold or play flop dependent incorrectly way too much at these stack sizes. Especiallly live. I can't believe how many decent to strong players I see that just approach <20bb game way too casually. There's math. You can solve it. You can even solve adjustments for those players that have solved it as well. I had said approach this spot with a range of whatever. If button folds 100% of the time and bb calls with the range I gave him (giving him 18 more combos would shift things 66-88 that i didn't include, but not by enough), then shoving any two cards is profitable by about two big blinds.

 

Think about it. If you see 5 cards only 9% of the time, meaning you get folds 91% of the time, it doesn't matter what you have. I just don't want to discredit taking this spot. Even increasing bb's calling range takes a bit because we have 2bb in dead money out there from the assumed to be folded button.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
47 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Tillery999

sdmathis89

ne0x00

adrianvaida2525

Anteeater

Laggro

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 12008

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1