November 4, 2013
Hello TPE,
It’s been a while. Some may remember me as a humble low stakes member a few years back. TPE helped me gain confidence and skill needed to maintain a positive trend. Without TPE I wouldn’t have been able to feel right about a good move than happened to bust me, nor would I have as often been able to pinpoint mistakes that happened to pay off.
I stopped playing for a while due to life just getting in the way, so naturally I cancelled my TPE status for a while.
Fastforward a few years and I started playing again because I have time again. Things are going pretty well – when I play on Merge, a very soft site. The traffic is too low though, so I decided to try Ignition. (I’m in the US so can’t do Stars).
Question:
I remember a lot from the videos of a handful of years ago. But so far I have not been able to crack Ignition. It seems less soft. It’s too early to tell, but I feel like I’m noticing some behaviors that are very different from what I see on Merge. And I can’t tell if what I’m seeing is donk or skill. Basically it’s a lot of open limping with premium hands to induce (as well as a balance of other hands which are folded to a raise) from just about any position with stacks below 20BB. A very big no no according to all the standard knowledge of 5 years ago. Is this more appropriate these days because of how many players are getting the hang of the loose aggressive style? Are we at a new phase where the way to exploit the table is to limp/induce more?
Follow up .. if it’s the case that we are doing more open limping to induce, how do we respond when we face the open limper and we have a playable hand? Are we limping behind them? Raising as usual because they should be balancing with weaker hands?
Thanks for reading.
February 8, 2017
Hey derSchwartz, welcome back! I’ve also been on hiatus from the forums recently (will post about it in the mental game forum soon for anyone that’s curious), but I’m back and expect to be fairly active moving forward.
It’s been over a year since I played regularly on Ignition but, comparing the play there to what I see on Stars and Party, I suspect that most of the open limpers are not secretly good players. There are many great players on the American sites but I found the recreational player pool larger and much worse than on the international sites. Some extremely good players use open limping ranges at around <= 25bb and it can be very effective, but I don’t recommend it. I think it takes a lot of work to split your preflop ranges effectively, and the return is unlikely to be worth it in the short to medium term. It also creates many confusing postflop spots where ranges are extremely wide and villains’ strategies are harder to anticipate.
Personally, I tried implementing a limping strategy a while back and abandoned it after ~500 MTTs. It created crazy value in a few spots but overall didn’t seem worth missing opportunities to steal the blinds and antes. Limping is inherently better if you’re playing without antes, but definitely not required. I will open limp exploitatively against a few player types (mostly maniacs) but otherwise, I only do it from the SB.
The nature of anonymous poker does allow for completely unbalanced play so you could try limping nutted hands if your tables regularly go crazy raising limpers. However, beware of confirmation bias; hands with multiple preflop raises are more memorable than those which reach the flop without any raising. Over a decent sample size, I strongly suspect that your best hands will win more bb/100 as raises than limps.
As for playing against limpers, my typical approach is to raise slightly tighter ranges. More or less raising as if you were in slightly earlier position, ie. raising your UTG+2 range from MP, raising your MP range from the HJ, etc. From the CO and BTN, I recommend limping behind with many hands that might otherwise be raised. Hands like A3s, J8s, 65s, 44, etc. You can realize a large portion of your equity just by seeing the flop in position, and doing so cheaply is great if you’re expecting limpers to 3bet somewhat frequently.
Once I’ve identified a weak/maniacal player, which can still be done if you’re at the same anonymous table for a few orbits, I start attacking their limps wider. I want to isolate the weak players as often as possible so that I get more opportunities to take their chips than the other regs. That’s more relevant at deeper stacks, there’s not nearly as much to be gained by playing wide ranges once effective stacks are < 40bb.
I hope that’s helpful, lemme know if you have any questions.
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
31 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
CSerpent
KJ
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12010
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1