August 10, 2014
At what point should I pay more attention to ICM than nash ranges?
I had a particularly passive final table tonight, and didn’t temper my shoving ranges. It would often fold to me in the small blind, and even before I was around ~10bb, the big blind was folding often.
Should I be passing up +ev shoves like this? Is the biggest factor whether or not I’m the shortest stack?
Thank you!
TPE Pro
August 25, 2012
Stack distribution is the biggest factor, yes. If you’re the shortest stack and there’s no reasonable chance of someone else busting before you (i.e. you have 12bb and the next shortest has 35bb) then going with Nash ranges/exploitative cEV ranges isn’t going to hurt you much. But if you have 12bb and another guy has 3bb, you should be way, way tighter than cEV Nash ranges.
There’s a lot of value still attached to having fold equity – so putting in the last bet still gives you some leeway – but especially when you’re the one calling it off, you need to be factoring in all the stacks around you before deciding on how much value there is in accumulating further chips. The shorter other players are, the more you gain from staying where you are.
Get yourself a copy of HoldemResources Calculator – this will basically solve a lot of your ICM queries. It can do cEV Nash, cEV exploits, ICM Nash and ICM exploits, and you’ll be surprised some of the crazy dynamics that happen when you have a reasonable idea of how other players are going to react to ICM situations.
Most Users Ever Online: 2780
Currently Online:
35 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
bennymacca: 2616
Foucault: 2067
folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133
praetor: 1033
theginger45: 924
P-aire 146: 832
Turbulence: 768
The Riceman: 731
duggs: 591
florianm1: 588
Newest Members:
Tillery999
sdmathis89
ne0x00
adrianvaida2525
Anteeater
Laggro
Forum Stats:
Groups: 4
Forums: 24
Topics: 12705
Posts: 75003
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1063
Members: 12008
Moderators: 2
Admins: 5
Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos
Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1